<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Heterosexual Agenda: The Opposite of Mamas&#8217; Boys</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/09/13/26093/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/09/13/26093</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 14:07:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regan DuCasse</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/09/13/26093/comment-page-1#comment-78379</link>
		<dc:creator>Regan DuCasse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 17:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=26093#comment-78379</guid>
		<description>A couple of things among many that blow Nicolosi&#039;s bull out of the park.

1. Although there have been incarcerated inmates researched who had been virtually fatherless by attrition and abandonment, they didn&#039;t become gay.

2. Although a majority of black women are single mothers, and also by attrition, there is no prevalence of homosexual sons in these households commiserate with a female dominated home.

3. Although the majority of lesbian mothers are also black, there is no higher prevalence of homosexuality in their sons or daughters either

  Nicolosi can easily be refuted, but he tends to not answer to these very comments, questions or statements, ESPECIALLY in an open forum.

   And even as he exalts himself as being so expert on this issue, he&#039;s selective about what questions he cares to answer. He hasn&#039;t figured out how to do so confidently and openly. He just avoids people who would ask them. Of whom I am one.

     These are all the earmarks of cowards and bullsh!t peddlers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of things among many that blow Nicolosi&#8217;s bull out of the park.</p>
<p>1. Although there have been incarcerated inmates researched who had been virtually fatherless by attrition and abandonment, they didn&#8217;t become gay.</p>
<p>2. Although a majority of black women are single mothers, and also by attrition, there is no prevalence of homosexual sons in these households commiserate with a female dominated home.</p>
<p>3. Although the majority of lesbian mothers are also black, there is no higher prevalence of homosexuality in their sons or daughters either</p>
<p>  Nicolosi can easily be refuted, but he tends to not answer to these very comments, questions or statements, ESPECIALLY in an open forum.</p>
<p>   And even as he exalts himself as being so expert on this issue, he&#8217;s selective about what questions he cares to answer. He hasn&#8217;t figured out how to do so confidently and openly. He just avoids people who would ask them. Of whom I am one.</p>
<p>     These are all the earmarks of cowards and bullsh!t peddlers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
