<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Star Parker, JC Watts and Bishop Harry Jackson file amicus brief for Prop 8 Proponents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/09/23/26577/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/09/23/26577</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 18:17:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob San Diego</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/09/23/26577/comment-page-1#comment-79447</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob San Diego</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 20:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=26577#comment-79447</guid>
		<description>Oh never mind, in my previous post in regards the the Liberty Counsel filing a brief, I had mentioned that the picture of the Liberty Counsel folk seemed pretty &quot;white&quot;.

I guess that in today&#039;s law firms even though &quot;blacks&quot; have won the right of equality and self respect through the courts, that they still hold their own law firms and don&#039;t mingle with the &quot;white folk&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh never mind, in my previous post in regards the the Liberty Counsel filing a brief, I had mentioned that the picture of the Liberty Counsel folk seemed pretty &#8220;white&#8221;.</p>
<p>I guess that in today&#8217;s law firms even though &#8220;blacks&#8221; have won the right of equality and self respect through the courts, that they still hold their own law firms and don&#8217;t mingle with the &#8220;white folk&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: customartist</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/09/23/26577/comment-page-1#comment-79427</link>
		<dc:creator>customartist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 18:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=26577#comment-79427</guid>
		<description>IF their &quot;definition&quot; of Marriage doesn&#039;t include Gays, this is only for the simple fact that they (Jackson and the likes) have historically Failed To Recognize both the existence and the validity of Gays in society.  They excluded Us.  They also excluded Women, and Blacks, Jews, etc, etc, etc.

NOW Jackson, and others, SAY that Marriage is the only area of concern for them, claiming that they support fair and equal treatmentfor Gays in all other areas, but i say that his is merely camoflage for their real feelings, put out there only temporarily for the purpose of forwarding their current cause.  Religious folk, generally, oppose even the concept that being Gay is a valid human condition.  Jackson will return to his hate-preaching as soon as this issue is resolved.  How many, I wonder, Gays does Jackson have in his church to hold up as an example of his kindness and consideration?____________  

If resolved in our favor then there will be little that he or others can (legally) do;

If resolved against us, then we must brace ourselves for reconstituted attacks on fronts other than Marriage - for certain, from the tax-exempt &quot;Christians&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IF their &#8220;definition&#8221; of Marriage doesn&#8217;t include Gays, this is only for the simple fact that they (Jackson and the likes) have historically Failed To Recognize both the existence and the validity of Gays in society.  They excluded Us.  They also excluded Women, and Blacks, Jews, etc, etc, etc.</p>
<p>NOW Jackson, and others, SAY that Marriage is the only area of concern for them, claiming that they support fair and equal treatmentfor Gays in all other areas, but i say that his is merely camoflage for their real feelings, put out there only temporarily for the purpose of forwarding their current cause.  Religious folk, generally, oppose even the concept that being Gay is a valid human condition.  Jackson will return to his hate-preaching as soon as this issue is resolved.  How many, I wonder, Gays does Jackson have in his church to hold up as an example of his kindness and consideration?____________  </p>
<p>If resolved in our favor then there will be little that he or others can (legally) do;</p>
<p>If resolved against us, then we must brace ourselves for reconstituted attacks on fronts other than Marriage &#8211; for certain, from the tax-exempt &#8220;Christians&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/09/23/26577/comment-page-1#comment-79379</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 07:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=26577#comment-79379</guid>
		<description>Am I the only one who thinks it&#039;s time to stop playing coalition politics with gay-bashers in the Af-Am and Hispanic communities?

Why should gays pay extra taxes to support health care for urban voters who hate us? No to Obamacare on that basis alone.

Why should gays support immigration reform that would import third-world homophobic church fodder into our country? Oppose immigration reform for those reasons.

Remember the Prop H8 exit polls, Mormons+blacks+hispanics=anti-gay.  SO let them go back to the Mormons for health care, I ain&#039;t paying for Obamacare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only one who thinks it&#8217;s time to stop playing coalition politics with gay-bashers in the Af-Am and Hispanic communities?</p>
<p>Why should gays pay extra taxes to support health care for urban voters who hate us? No to Obamacare on that basis alone.</p>
<p>Why should gays support immigration reform that would import third-world homophobic church fodder into our country? Oppose immigration reform for those reasons.</p>
<p>Remember the Prop H8 exit polls, Mormons+blacks+hispanics=anti-gay.  SO let them go back to the Mormons for health care, I ain&#8217;t paying for Obamacare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cd</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/09/23/26577/comment-page-1#comment-79369</link>
		<dc:creator>cd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 05:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=26577#comment-79369</guid>
		<description>Bayard Rustin is looking down from Heaven with his face in his hands, saying &quot;Martin, have a look at this crazy sh-t.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bayard Rustin is looking down from Heaven with his face in his hands, saying &#8220;Martin, have a look at this crazy sh-t.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TampaZeke</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/09/23/26577/comment-page-1#comment-79346</link>
		<dc:creator>TampaZeke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 01:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=26577#comment-79346</guid>
		<description>You mean &quot;Bishop&quot; Eddie Long didn&#039;t get in on this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean &#8220;Bishop&#8221; Eddie Long didn&#8217;t get in on this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lindoro Almaviva</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/09/23/26577/comment-page-1#comment-79308</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindoro Almaviva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 22:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=26577#comment-79308</guid>
		<description>Hallowed ground... Where have I heard that phrase used to deny people their right of free association and free enterprise? I am wrecking my brain to figure out where I have heard this before; different context though. (/sarcasm)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hallowed ground&#8230; Where have I heard that phrase used to deny people their right of free association and free enterprise? I am wrecking my brain to figure out where I have heard this before; different context though. (/sarcasm)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomTallis</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/09/23/26577/comment-page-1#comment-79305</link>
		<dc:creator>TomTallis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 21:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=26577#comment-79305</guid>
		<description>Lucky us.  In our congressional district we have a choice between the Democrat, Laura Richardson, tagged as one of the most corrupt in congress (but who is pro same sex marriage) and the abysmally stupid, Star Parker.  

I&#039;m holding my nose and voting for Richardson, because Parker would be sooooooooooo much worse, and given the chance I&#039;m quite sure would surpass Richardson in corruption.  She IS a Republican, after all...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lucky us.  In our congressional district we have a choice between the Democrat, Laura Richardson, tagged as one of the most corrupt in congress (but who is pro same sex marriage) and the abysmally stupid, Star Parker.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m holding my nose and voting for Richardson, because Parker would be sooooooooooo much worse, and given the chance I&#8217;m quite sure would surpass Richardson in corruption.  She IS a Republican, after all&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/09/23/26577/comment-page-1#comment-79304</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 21:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=26577#comment-79304</guid>
		<description>So cultural icons are like hallowed ground that can&#039;t be touched? Only for black people?  

I recall a story about how drinking fountains were the hallowed ground of whites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So cultural icons are like hallowed ground that can&#8217;t be touched? Only for black people?  </p>
<p>I recall a story about how drinking fountains were the hallowed ground of whites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
