<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Judge Orders Lesbian Discharged Under DADT Reinstated</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/09/24/26642/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/09/24/26642</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 23:25:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noah</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/09/24/26642/comment-page-1#comment-79501</link>
		<dc:creator>Noah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2010 06:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=26642#comment-79501</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m happy to see her get her job back, but I get the feeling that the Christian Conservatives will have a field day with this--especially considering that DADT repeal just got delayed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m happy to see her get her job back, but I get the feeling that the Christian Conservatives will have a field day with this&#8211;especially considering that DADT repeal just got delayed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: occono</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/09/24/26642/comment-page-1#comment-79468</link>
		<dc:creator>occono</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 23:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=26642#comment-79468</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pretty sure that there&#039;d be some gay Democrat soldiers who&#039;d object.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure that there&#8217;d be some gay Democrat soldiers who&#8217;d object.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/09/24/26642/comment-page-1#comment-79466</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 23:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=26642#comment-79466</guid>
		<description>Couldn&#039;t Judge Phillips limit her injunction to all present AND future Log Cabin members? That would (barely) be in the &quot;thresh hold&quot; mentioned by the DOJ, but be amorphous enough to possibly include every LGB in service (they would have to join Log Cabin en masse to be under the injunction).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t Judge Phillips limit her injunction to all present AND future Log Cabin members? That would (barely) be in the &#8220;thresh hold&#8221; mentioned by the DOJ, but be amorphous enough to possibly include every LGB in service (they would have to join Log Cabin en masse to be under the injunction).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
