<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Administration appeals DOMA ruling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/10/12/27252/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/10/12/27252</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 17:13:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Priya Lynn</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/10/12/27252/comment-page-1#comment-80770</link>
		<dc:creator>Priya Lynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=27252#comment-80770</guid>
		<description>Timothy, gay equality is part of the progressive agenda so you&#039;re a supporter of part of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Timothy, gay equality is part of the progressive agenda so you&#8217;re a supporter of part of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Kincaid</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/10/12/27252/comment-page-1#comment-80768</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Kincaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 14:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=27252#comment-80768</guid>
		<description>Nate,

I am not a supporter of &quot;the progressive agenda&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nate,</p>
<p>I am not a supporter of &#8220;the progressive agenda&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate W.</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/10/12/27252/comment-page-1#comment-80766</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 14:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=27252#comment-80766</guid>
		<description>Timothy K., Where in the tenth Amendment does it affirmatively state that the federal government cannot do anything? The tenth amendment basically states &quot;those powers that are not delegated to the federal government in the Constitution are retained by the states or the people.&quot; The Court in _Gill_ stated that the tenth amendment provides a limit on Congress&#039;s authority over &quot;traditional state functions,&quot; which is no where in the text and was explicitly rejected by the supreme court in _Garcia._  There are sound 14th amendment reasons to reject DOMA, and I hope the 1st Circuit finds that way. I just think it is dangerous for the progressive agenda to allow the positive tenth amendment (which was finally killed at the beginning of the new deal) to be resurrected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Timothy K., Where in the tenth Amendment does it affirmatively state that the federal government cannot do anything? The tenth amendment basically states &#8220;those powers that are not delegated to the federal government in the Constitution are retained by the states or the people.&#8221; The Court in _Gill_ stated that the tenth amendment provides a limit on Congress&#8217;s authority over &#8220;traditional state functions,&#8221; which is no where in the text and was explicitly rejected by the supreme court in _Garcia._  There are sound 14th amendment reasons to reject DOMA, and I hope the 1st Circuit finds that way. I just think it is dangerous for the progressive agenda to allow the positive tenth amendment (which was finally killed at the beginning of the new deal) to be resurrected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Kincaid</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/10/12/27252/comment-page-1#comment-80753</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Kincaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 07:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=27252#comment-80753</guid>
		<description>Nate... we do have a 10th amendment and it really does limit the federal government.  And I, at least, am a strong supporter of the tenth amendment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nate&#8230; we do have a 10th amendment and it really does limit the federal government.  And I, at least, am a strong supporter of the tenth amendment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Kincaid</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/10/12/27252/comment-page-1#comment-80752</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Kincaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 07:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=27252#comment-80752</guid>
		<description>ebohlman,

I thought Connecticut was as well.  My error.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ebohlman,</p>
<p>I thought Connecticut was as well.  My error.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate W.</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/10/12/27252/comment-page-1#comment-80748</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 04:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=27252#comment-80748</guid>
		<description>I would have appealed it if I were the Obama DOJ--the judge included some crazy tenther BS into the ruling that really needs to get smacked down by an appeals court. &lt;a href=&quot;http://balkin.blogspot.com/2010/07/be-careful-what-you-wish-for-department.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;This post&lt;/a&gt; explains more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have appealed it if I were the Obama DOJ&#8211;the judge included some crazy tenther BS into the ruling that really needs to get smacked down by an appeals court. <a href="http://balkin.blogspot.com/2010/07/be-careful-what-you-wish-for-department.html" rel="nofollow">This post</a> explains more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/10/12/27252/comment-page-1#comment-80746</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 04:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=27252#comment-80746</guid>
		<description>Whiskey.  Tango.  Foxtrot.

What used up wad of toilet paper decided to appeal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whiskey.  Tango.  Foxtrot.</p>
<p>What used up wad of toilet paper decided to appeal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob San Diego</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/10/12/27252/comment-page-1#comment-80743</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob San Diego</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 03:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=27252#comment-80743</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to have to agree with Timothy on this one. The thought that it will just keep getting appealed to the SCOTUS where there is no guarantee that we would win with such a conservative court.  Personally I&#039;m getting sick and tired of all these appeals we&#039;re getting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to have to agree with Timothy on this one. The thought that it will just keep getting appealed to the SCOTUS where there is no guarantee that we would win with such a conservative court.  Personally I&#8217;m getting sick and tired of all these appeals we&#8217;re getting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John in the Bay Area</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/10/12/27252/comment-page-1#comment-80739</link>
		<dc:creator>John in the Bay Area</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 02:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=27252#comment-80739</guid>
		<description>Obama has given lip service to opposing DOMA, but has done nothing to overturn it.  He has vigorously defended DOMA whenever it has been challenged.

Actions truely do speak louder than words.  It is clear that Obama completely supports DOMA and will do whatever he can to defend that law, and apparently every other piece of anti-gay legislation out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama has given lip service to opposing DOMA, but has done nothing to overturn it.  He has vigorously defended DOMA whenever it has been challenged.</p>
<p>Actions truely do speak louder than words.  It is clear that Obama completely supports DOMA and will do whatever he can to defend that law, and apparently every other piece of anti-gay legislation out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ebohlman</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/10/12/27252/comment-page-1#comment-80737</link>
		<dc:creator>ebohlman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 02:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=27252#comment-80737</guid>
		<description>Timothy: New Hampshire is the only other state in the First Circuit with equal marriage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Timothy: New Hampshire is the only other state in the First Circuit with equal marriage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
