I’d also like to know if there’s a hetro reparative group for those who want to experience their true gay self. The counterpart of Exodus, except more fabulous and fun and liberating.

I suspect there have been some people who, after signing up with Exodus, take one look at Randy, and say, “Oh my, I didn’t realize this was a hetero reparative group.”

TRiG.

I’d also like to know if there’s a hetro reparative group for those who want to experience their true gay self. The counterpart of Exodus, except more fabulous and fun and liberating.

Or your mistress, or luggage lifter, etc. It’s not WHO you have sex with, it is that you have a wife. And if you happen to happen to have it with a dude, make sure you still have a wife.

They’re not saying that SSA is a choice. They acknowledged that, like alcoholism, some people may be born with a predisposition towards SSA (not him, of course). But if you have “it”, you don’t have to act on “it”…the same way you don’t have to act on your alcoholism. This is secular “love the sinner, hate the sin” sort of stuff.

Apparently, he tried to explain himself to reporters news, “I am not a biologist and I haven’t studied the issue, but that’s my opinion,” Buck said. “I wasn’t talking about being gay as a disease. I don’t think that at all and I hope that no one would be that insensitive to try to draw that…I certainly didn’t mean it that way.”

But how else can you possibly construe it? If it’s not a disease, then you’re saying it’s certainly wrong, right? And if it’s a predisposition you’re born with but shouldn’t act on, then why should “it” have civil rights protections.

And by spinning the debate this way, the Wingnuts are able to talk out every orifice of their body. “Ex-gay” is simply not doing gay stuff…you can have gay thoughts…you can even fantasize about Brad Pitt while you have your twice yearly sex with your wife…as long as you do do your wife.

How do they get to think they can argue or decide or declare what a gay person thinks, feels, intends or can, regardless of what the gay folks have to say about it however honestly and factually?

A person with no medical training,nor experience as a surgeon, would argue with one, can’t argue that they know more about surgery than said doctor.

So how can a person, with NO experience or understanding or in depth relationships with gay people, keep talking as if more knowledgeable about what being gay is?

Or that it’s a choice?

This is the most mind boggling and STUPIDEST thing I keep seeing over and over again.

I never tell a man what it’s like to have testicles and a man would look like an idiot lecturing me that he knows more about cramps than I do.

And yes, I tell straight people they DO look like idiots arguing in this way, for the aforementioned reasons I give.

I’m voting for Bennet here in Colorado. I’m also aprising everyone I know of this man’s ignorance, and advising them to vote for Bennet as well.