<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ninth Circuit Court Stays DADT Injunction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/10/20/27501/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/10/20/27501</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:59:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John in the Bay Area</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/10/20/27501/comment-page-1#comment-81371</link>
		<dc:creator>John in the Bay Area</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 22:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=27501#comment-81371</guid>
		<description>He could issue a stop loss order at any time.  This would prevent discharges for as long as the stop loss order was in effect.  It would not repeal the law, like the court ruling did (which he appealed and successfully reinstated the law so that his administration can continue to discharge gay and lesbian servicemembers).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He could issue a stop loss order at any time.  This would prevent discharges for as long as the stop loss order was in effect.  It would not repeal the law, like the court ruling did (which he appealed and successfully reinstated the law so that his administration can continue to discharge gay and lesbian servicemembers).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KZ</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/10/20/27501/comment-page-1#comment-81361</link>
		<dc:creator>KZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 20:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=27501#comment-81361</guid>
		<description>I heard that Obama could issue an executive order putting a moratorium on all DADT discharges.

Is this true? Couldn&#039;t he at least do that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard that Obama could issue an executive order putting a moratorium on all DADT discharges.</p>
<p>Is this true? Couldn&#8217;t he at least do that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John in the Bay Area</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/10/20/27501/comment-page-1#comment-81352</link>
		<dc:creator>John in the Bay Area</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=27501#comment-81352</guid>
		<description>The president is not legally required to appeal this court&#039;s ruling.  He has declined to do so in other cases, as has previous presidents.

This president&#039;s commitment to defending bigotry and maintaining this discriminatory law is truely disheartening.  Perhaps our next president will have a stronger commitment to equality for all Americans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The president is not legally required to appeal this court&#8217;s ruling.  He has declined to do so in other cases, as has previous presidents.</p>
<p>This president&#8217;s commitment to defending bigotry and maintaining this discriminatory law is truely disheartening.  Perhaps our next president will have a stronger commitment to equality for all Americans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Burroway</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/10/20/27501/comment-page-1#comment-81347</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Burroway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=27501#comment-81347</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Update (Oct 21):&lt;/strong&gt; A new memorandum may come &lt;a href=&quot;http://hosted2.ap.org/APDefault/8ef5320729ce4298abefc1903704c7d5/Article_2010-10-21-US-Gays-in-Military/id-6bdd70225c884d089f63587fefac5081&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;sooner than first thought&lt;/a&gt;:
&lt;blockquote&gt;The  Pentagon says it&#039;s working to come up with new guidelines regarding  gays serving in the military after a court ruling restored the &quot;don&#039;t  ask, don&#039;t tell&quot; law, at least for now. Defense Department spokesman Col. Dave Lapan said Thursday that he expects the guidelines be announced later in the day.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Update (Oct 21):</strong> A new memorandum may come <a href="http://hosted2.ap.org/APDefault/8ef5320729ce4298abefc1903704c7d5/Article_2010-10-21-US-Gays-in-Military/id-6bdd70225c884d089f63587fefac5081" rel="nofollow">sooner than first thought</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The  Pentagon says it&#8217;s working to come up with new guidelines regarding  gays serving in the military after a court ruling restored the &#8220;don&#8217;t  ask, don&#8217;t tell&#8221; law, at least for now. Defense Department spokesman Col. Dave Lapan said Thursday that he expects the guidelines be announced later in the day.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: customartist</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/10/20/27501/comment-page-1#comment-81343</link>
		<dc:creator>customartist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=27501#comment-81343</guid>
		<description>Email Congress:
https://writerep.house.gov/writerep/welcome.shtml

Email Senate:
http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm

Call the Congress and Senate:  (202)224-3121

*The Operator will direct you if you do not know your representative

*IMPORTANT*
Make your calls and letters to Congress polite and to the point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Email Congress:<br />
<a href="https://writerep.house.gov/writerep/welcome.shtml" rel="nofollow">https://writerep.house.gov/writerep/welcome.shtml</a></p>
<p>Email Senate:<br />
<a href="http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm" rel="nofollow">http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm</a></p>
<p>Call the Congress and Senate:  (202)224-3121</p>
<p>*The Operator will direct you if you do not know your representative</p>
<p>*IMPORTANT*<br />
Make your calls and letters to Congress polite and to the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MJC</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/10/20/27501/comment-page-1#comment-81342</link>
		<dc:creator>MJC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=27501#comment-81342</guid>
		<description>See Walter Dellinger&#039;s Op-Ed in the NY Times today. The President is legally prevented by the law itself from &#039;tossing&#039; it. Here&#039;s the link:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/21/opinion/21dellinger.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See Walter Dellinger&#8217;s Op-Ed in the NY Times today. The President is legally prevented by the law itself from &#8216;tossing&#8217; it. Here&#8217;s the link:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/21/opinion/21dellinger.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/21/opinion/21dellinger.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iDavid</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/10/20/27501/comment-page-1#comment-81333</link>
		<dc:creator>iDavid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 06:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=27501#comment-81333</guid>
		<description>A couple of things 1) If some 80% of Americans want DADT tossed, then for brownie points for the election, why wouldn&#039;t O&#039;bama toss it now? 2) I&#039;m amazed SF would buckle on the stay, though I am holding out for Oct 25th for their redemption.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of things 1) If some 80% of Americans want DADT tossed, then for brownie points for the election, why wouldn&#8217;t O&#8217;bama toss it now? 2) I&#8217;m amazed SF would buckle on the stay, though I am holding out for Oct 25th for their redemption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lindoro Almaviva</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/10/20/27501/comment-page-1#comment-81330</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindoro Almaviva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 04:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=27501#comment-81330</guid>
		<description>And the Obama administration is openly questioning why are people staying home this election day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the Obama administration is openly questioning why are people staying home this election day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
