<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pentagon Releases Revised DADT Guidance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/10/21/27515/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/10/21/27515</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 14:07:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John in the Bay Area</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/10/21/27515/comment-page-1#comment-81409</link>
		<dc:creator>John in the Bay Area</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=27515#comment-81409</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, this memo says nothing about rigorously enforcing the Don&#039;t Ask and the Don&#039;t Pursue portions of the law.  To my knowledge, nobody has been disciplined for asking a servicemember if they are gay or pursuing an investigation of a servicemember who did not admit to being gay in the first place.

If those sections of the law were seriously enforced, with consequences for those who violated the law, there would have been a lot fewer discharges over the last 17 years.  In fact, people would have been reluctant to pursue the question of whether someone was gay for fear of losing their own job in the process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, this memo says nothing about rigorously enforcing the Don&#8217;t Ask and the Don&#8217;t Pursue portions of the law.  To my knowledge, nobody has been disciplined for asking a servicemember if they are gay or pursuing an investigation of a servicemember who did not admit to being gay in the first place.</p>
<p>If those sections of the law were seriously enforced, with consequences for those who violated the law, there would have been a lot fewer discharges over the last 17 years.  In fact, people would have been reluctant to pursue the question of whether someone was gay for fear of losing their own job in the process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben in Oakland</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/10/21/27515/comment-page-1#comment-81369</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben in Oakland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 22:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=27515#comment-81369</guid>
		<description>If it needs to be cleared at the highest levels, and if these soldiers are around for a while, will not that invalidate all of their reasons for keeping DADT alive?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it needs to be cleared at the highest levels, and if these soldiers are around for a while, will not that invalidate all of their reasons for keeping DADT alive?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
