<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: House passes standalone DADT repeal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/12/15/28500/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/12/15/28500</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 02:47:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: palerobber</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/12/15/28500/comment-page-1#comment-85040</link>
		<dc:creator>palerobber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 21:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=28500#comment-85040</guid>
		<description>@Dan

this stand alone bill got 21 more yea votes that the defense authorization bill with repeal included.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dan</p>
<p>this stand alone bill got 21 more yea votes that the defense authorization bill with repeal included.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justsearching</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/12/15/28500/comment-page-1#comment-85026</link>
		<dc:creator>justsearching</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=28500#comment-85026</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a more helpful run-down of the votes: http://politics.nytimes.com/congress/votes/111/house/2/638?ref=politics</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a more helpful run-down of the votes: <a href="http://politics.nytimes.com/congress/votes/111/house/2/638?ref=politics" rel="nofollow">http://politics.nytimes.com/congress/votes/111/house/2/638?ref=politics</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RWG</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/12/15/28500/comment-page-1#comment-85024</link>
		<dc:creator>RWG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=28500#comment-85024</guid>
		<description>@CB: James Carville, the Democratic political strategist and commentator once described Pennsylvania as &quot;Philadelphia and Pittsburgh with Alabama in between.&quot; That&#039;s fairly accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@CB: James Carville, the Democratic political strategist and commentator once described Pennsylvania as &#8220;Philadelphia and Pittsburgh with Alabama in between.&#8221; That&#8217;s fairly accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/12/15/28500/comment-page-1#comment-85019</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=28500#comment-85019</guid>
		<description>Palerobber:  Do you happen to have the list of Republicans who voted for it and also which of those were defeated or retired?  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Palerobber:  Do you happen to have the list of Republicans who voted for it and also which of those were defeated or retired?  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/12/15/28500/comment-page-1#comment-85004</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 03:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=28500#comment-85004</guid>
		<description>,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CB</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/12/15/28500/comment-page-1#comment-85002</link>
		<dc:creator>CB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 01:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=28500#comment-85002</guid>
		<description>Not much of a surprise on the Dems voting against it. Majority are from the South (which is strongly Republican and bigoted). Missouri and Minnesota sit on the fence, but surprising was Pennsylvania, which I thought was a Dem stronghold.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not much of a surprise on the Dems voting against it. Majority are from the South (which is strongly Republican and bigoted). Missouri and Minnesota sit on the fence, but surprising was Pennsylvania, which I thought was a Dem stronghold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/12/15/28500/comment-page-1#comment-84997</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 23:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=28500#comment-84997</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d be interested in knowing how this vote compares with the previous vote on the military appropriations bill with DADT repeal attached. The could give us an indication of the stand-alone bill&#039;s chances in the Senate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be interested in knowing how this vote compares with the previous vote on the military appropriations bill with DADT repeal attached. The could give us an indication of the stand-alone bill&#8217;s chances in the Senate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: palerobber</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/12/15/28500/comment-page-1#comment-84996</link>
		<dc:creator>palerobber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 23:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=28500#comment-84996</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;dems voting against:&lt;/b&gt;
Boren (OK-02)
Bright (AL-02) defeated
Childers (MS-01) defeated
Critz (PA-12) 
Davis (AL-07) retiring
Davis (TN-04) defeated
Marshall (GA-08) defeated
McIntyre (NC-07)
Ortiz (TX-27) defeated
Peterson (MN-07)
Rahall (WV-03)
Ross (AR-04)
Skelton (MO-04) defeated
Tanner (TN-08) retiring
Taylor (MS-04) defeated</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>dems voting against:</b><br />
Boren (OK-02)<br />
Bright (AL-02) defeated<br />
Childers (MS-01) defeated<br />
Critz (PA-12)<br />
Davis (AL-07) retiring<br />
Davis (TN-04) defeated<br />
Marshall (GA-08) defeated<br />
McIntyre (NC-07)<br />
Ortiz (TX-27) defeated<br />
Peterson (MN-07)<br />
Rahall (WV-03)<br />
Ross (AR-04)<br />
Skelton (MO-04) defeated<br />
Tanner (TN-08) retiring<br />
Taylor (MS-04) defeated</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris McCoy</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/12/15/28500/comment-page-1#comment-84993</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris McCoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 23:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=28500#comment-84993</guid>
		<description>Oops. That 2nd link in my previous comment should be &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/#hl=en&amp;q=H.R.+6520&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops. That 2nd link in my previous comment should be <a href="http://www.google.com/#hl=en&amp;q=H.R.+6520" rel="nofollow">this</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/12/15/28500/comment-page-1#comment-84992</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 23:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=28500#comment-84992</guid>
		<description>@edwin

Voting for it or against it will not impact a single congresspersons job - pro or con.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@edwin</p>
<p>Voting for it or against it will not impact a single congresspersons job &#8211; pro or con.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
