<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pawlenty Supports De-Funding DADT&#8217;s Repeal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/02/07/30340/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/02/07/30340</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 02:47:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/02/07/30340/comment-page-1#comment-88692</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 16:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=30340#comment-88692</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand how one would defund the repeal of DADT.  About all I could being impacted would be the training mandated for all servicemembers.  That would a detriment to everyone involved, regardless of whether they were gay or straight.  Yet even so, the ban would be gone so this would accomplish zilch.  Of course it will never get past the Senate let alone signed into law by Obama so even if we assume that Pawlenty wins in 2012 by then the matter will be moot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand how one would defund the repeal of DADT.  About all I could being impacted would be the training mandated for all servicemembers.  That would a detriment to everyone involved, regardless of whether they were gay or straight.  Yet even so, the ban would be gone so this would accomplish zilch.  Of course it will never get past the Senate let alone signed into law by Obama so even if we assume that Pawlenty wins in 2012 by then the matter will be moot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tristram</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/02/07/30340/comment-page-1#comment-88660</link>
		<dc:creator>tristram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 04:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=30340#comment-88660</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t Pawlenty the &#039;moderate&#039; in the Republican field? As in THE moderate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t Pawlenty the &#8216;moderate&#8217; in the Republican field? As in THE moderate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob San Diego</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/02/07/30340/comment-page-1#comment-88650</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob San Diego</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 02:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=30340#comment-88650</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t it amazing that it costs money to end discrimination. Isn&#039;t it amazing that it costs money to not not fire our men and women in the military?

I wonder what he will do with that money, prostitutes, drugs, kick backs to friends in big business? 

Why I bet that if he were to win the presidency, he&#039;ll slash the big government spending, but will increase the funding for routing out them evil homos who want to serve their country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it amazing that it costs money to end discrimination. Isn&#8217;t it amazing that it costs money to not not fire our men and women in the military?</p>
<p>I wonder what he will do with that money, prostitutes, drugs, kick backs to friends in big business? </p>
<p>Why I bet that if he were to win the presidency, he&#8217;ll slash the big government spending, but will increase the funding for routing out them evil homos who want to serve their country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
