<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hawaii to get Civil Unions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/02/16/30538/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/02/16/30538</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 12:09:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cowboy</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/02/16/30538/comment-page-1#comment-89132</link>
		<dc:creator>cowboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 15:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=30538#comment-89132</guid>
		<description>Are we celebrating this good news?   At the very least this should show a vulnerability in the power of NOM (a.k.a. the Mormons) in Hawaiian politics?  All the work of the Mormons in Hawaii was for naught.   Or are Mormons okay with gay civil marriages now?

Hmmm…I have less than 10 months to prepare for a wedding next January.   

Congratulations for those in Hawaii.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are we celebrating this good news?   At the very least this should show a vulnerability in the power of NOM (a.k.a. the Mormons) in Hawaiian politics?  All the work of the Mormons in Hawaii was for naught.   Or are Mormons okay with gay civil marriages now?</p>
<p>Hmmm…I have less than 10 months to prepare for a wedding next January.   </p>
<p>Congratulations for those in Hawaii.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RJ</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/02/16/30538/comment-page-1#comment-89099</link>
		<dc:creator>RJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 23:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=30538#comment-89099</guid>
		<description>Umm... Jan 1, 2012?

I&#039;m really confused here.  If the legislation is passed in the next 10 days, it&#039;s going to take 10 months before they can issue the first civil unions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umm&#8230; Jan 1, 2012?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m really confused here.  If the legislation is passed in the next 10 days, it&#8217;s going to take 10 months before they can issue the first civil unions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
