<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Play About Mormon Shock Therapy &#8220;Cure&#8221; Opens In October</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/03/30/31648/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/03/30/31648</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:59:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cowboy</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/03/30/31648/comment-page-1#comment-95220</link>
		<dc:creator>cowboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 20:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=31648#comment-95220</guid>
		<description>BYU (by extension, an agency of the Mormon Church) has done some terrible things to homosexuals in their midst.  I know a gay LDSaint told me he went through convulsions when he went through electro-shock treatments at BYU.     

Was it some experiment at BYU not sanctioned by any ethical medical association?

Could the Mormon Church be trying to distance itself from this particularly sordid past to indemnify itself from any legal action?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BYU (by extension, an agency of the Mormon Church) has done some terrible things to homosexuals in their midst.  I know a gay LDSaint told me he went through convulsions when he went through electro-shock treatments at BYU.     </p>
<p>Was it some experiment at BYU not sanctioned by any ethical medical association?</p>
<p>Could the Mormon Church be trying to distance itself from this particularly sordid past to indemnify itself from any legal action?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Cameron</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/03/30/31648/comment-page-1#comment-95200</link>
		<dc:creator>John Cameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 02:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=31648#comment-95200</guid>
		<description>I wrote the play 14. I just wanted to let everyone know that there were a few mistakes in the article at ABC.com which have since been corrected.  Ford never said there was no such thing as homosexuality, although my intro to psych teacher at BYU did say it when I went to him for help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote the play 14. I just wanted to let everyone know that there were a few mistakes in the article at ABC.com which have since been corrected.  Ford never said there was no such thing as homosexuality, although my intro to psych teacher at BYU did say it when I went to him for help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amicus</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/03/30/31648/comment-page-1#comment-91810</link>
		<dc:creator>Amicus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 06:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=31648#comment-91810</guid>
		<description>Cowboy, it certainly was not.

England, for instance, gave some people the option to &quot;volunteer&quot; to be tortured &quot;medically&quot; or else be locked up, if they had been arrested.

Some actually volunteered to be tortured.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC344257/

&lt;blockquote&gt;No participant thought they had benefited from treatment and for many it increased their sense of social isolation and shame.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

In Germany, Steinach did other tortures.  He did surgery, putting the testicles of corpses into gay men.  As I recall, the first were involuntary (unethical by today&#039;s standards) and the later were all tragically voluntary, based on false hopes.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/longterm/books/chap1/queerscience.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cowboy, it certainly was not.</p>
<p>England, for instance, gave some people the option to &#8220;volunteer&#8221; to be tortured &#8220;medically&#8221; or else be locked up, if they had been arrested.</p>
<p>Some actually volunteered to be tortured.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC344257/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC344257/</a></p>
<blockquote><p>No participant thought they had benefited from treatment and for many it increased their sense of social isolation and shame.</p></blockquote>
<p>In Germany, Steinach did other tortures.  He did surgery, putting the testicles of corpses into gay men.  As I recall, the first were involuntary (unethical by today&#8217;s standards) and the later were all tragically voluntary, based on false hopes.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/longterm/books/chap1/queerscience.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/longterm/books/chap1/queerscience.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Rush</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/03/30/31648/comment-page-1#comment-91793</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Rush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 19:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=31648#comment-91793</guid>
		<description>Corrected:

&lt;blockquote&gt;No one is a &lt;del&gt;homosexual&lt;/del&gt; Mormon. &lt;del&gt;Homosexuality&lt;/del&gt; Mormonism doesn’t exist. It’s just a symptom of &lt;del&gt;a deeper problem&lt;/del&gt; indoctrination that you are not willing to deal with.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

A corollary is that no one is born a Mormon (or conventional Christian, etc.). Everyone is born an atheist (as God intended them to be;)). Thus Mormons (and conventional Christians, etc.) are just atheists with an indoctrination problem.

While there is no confirmed evidence that a homosexual can convert to a heterosexual, there are mountains of evidence that people of one religion can convert to another, or none.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corrected:</p>
<blockquote><p>No one is a <del>homosexual</del> Mormon. <del>Homosexuality</del> Mormonism doesn’t exist. It’s just a symptom of <del>a deeper problem</del> indoctrination that you are not willing to deal with.</p></blockquote>
<p>A corollary is that no one is born a Mormon (or conventional Christian, etc.). Everyone is born an atheist (as God intended them to be;)). Thus Mormons (and conventional Christians, etc.) are just atheists with an indoctrination problem.</p>
<p>While there is no confirmed evidence that a homosexual can convert to a heterosexual, there are mountains of evidence that people of one religion can convert to another, or none.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cowboy</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/03/30/31648/comment-page-1#comment-91792</link>
		<dc:creator>Cowboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 18:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=31648#comment-91792</guid>
		<description>Was shock therapy only a Mormon thing?  

 

It’s just my observation and with some first-hand accounts of some Mormons I know but they don’t really care if the cause of homosexuality is biological or learned.  It can be cured because it’s not how God made me.  And if it can’t be cured with one method they’ll use the scientific arm of their beloved BYU to find some way to adjust your orientation. 

 

The use of aversions-therapy/torture was only one methodology used by Mormons.  I know my family attempted to play the “tough love” psychological tricks on me.  They said I would go to outer darkness when I died.   I would be shunned.   I would be the object of ridicule and vandalism.  I even had the “I wish you were never born…” statement along with a mocking limp-wrist signal tossed at me by my Mother.  

 

It’s like they have a ‘list’ of suggested statements to read they get from a pamphlet:  “How to React When Your Son/Daughter Tells You They are Gay.”   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was shock therapy only a Mormon thing?  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>It’s just my observation and with some first-hand accounts of some Mormons I know but they don’t really care if the cause of homosexuality is biological or learned.  It can be cured because it’s not how God made me.  And if it can’t be cured with one method they’ll use the scientific arm of their beloved BYU to find some way to adjust your orientation. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>The use of aversions-therapy/torture was only one methodology used by Mormons.  I know my family attempted to play the “tough love” psychological tricks on me.  They said I would go to outer darkness when I died.   I would be shunned.   I would be the object of ridicule and vandalism.  I even had the “I wish you were never born…” statement along with a mocking limp-wrist signal tossed at me by my Mother.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>It’s like they have a ‘list’ of suggested statements to read they get from a pamphlet:  “How to React When Your Son/Daughter Tells You They are Gay.”   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amicus</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/03/30/31648/comment-page-1#comment-91781</link>
		<dc:creator>Amicus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 12:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=31648#comment-91781</guid>
		<description>Oh, and let&#039;s be clear, to anticipate objections.

The physical torture did not end because it was torture.  It ended because they came to think (McBride or otherwise) that it wasn&#039;t effective. (!)

Which leaves the everpresent possibility that it could start again, just with a &#039;new technique&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and let&#8217;s be clear, to anticipate objections.</p>
<p>The physical torture did not end because it was torture.  It ended because they came to think (McBride or otherwise) that it wasn&#8217;t effective. (!)</p>
<p>Which leaves the everpresent possibility that it could start again, just with a &#8216;new technique&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amicus</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/03/30/31648/comment-page-1#comment-91778</link>
		<dc:creator>Amicus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 10:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=31648#comment-91778</guid>
		<description>Regarding &quot;fundamental dogma&quot;, I&#039;ll add since it is fresh in mind, that the &quot;New Natural Law&quot; is fully complicit, so far as one can tell.

NNL state plainly that gay sex, even for gays (!), is &quot;illusory&quot;.

Strangely, some of them seem to admit that there is a class of individuals that might (biologically?) be gay (I don&#039;t have source on this, yet, just second hand - if anyone has, do share); but, nevertheless, the *only* expression of that available to them is ... fake (immoral), no matter how subjectively perfective or objectively integrative and constructive it might be.

Is it any wonder that the &#039;natural&#039; result of such an undiscerning view, in culture and at law, is torture, another gross assault on the dignity of the individual?

And I think this has moral implications for those who sit smugly on the sidelines of this, mumbling that they would never condone torture, but love the sinner and hate the sin.  Not only do they give leeway at law and in culture to those who would do torture (on the kids and even adults), they fail to consider the grave peril of their own position (or &quot;soul&quot;):  what if they are wrong and there is no intrinsic &quot;sin&quot;?

Thus, in full discernment, there is a clear path from these considerations to equality-at-law (for *gays*, not &quot;in general&quot;), either by mercy or by right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding &#8220;fundamental dogma&#8221;, I&#8217;ll add since it is fresh in mind, that the &#8220;New Natural Law&#8221; is fully complicit, so far as one can tell.</p>
<p>NNL state plainly that gay sex, even for gays (!), is &#8220;illusory&#8221;.</p>
<p>Strangely, some of them seem to admit that there is a class of individuals that might (biologically?) be gay (I don&#8217;t have source on this, yet, just second hand &#8211; if anyone has, do share); but, nevertheless, the *only* expression of that available to them is &#8230; fake (immoral), no matter how subjectively perfective or objectively integrative and constructive it might be.</p>
<p>Is it any wonder that the &#8216;natural&#8217; result of such an undiscerning view, in culture and at law, is torture, another gross assault on the dignity of the individual?</p>
<p>And I think this has moral implications for those who sit smugly on the sidelines of this, mumbling that they would never condone torture, but love the sinner and hate the sin.  Not only do they give leeway at law and in culture to those who would do torture (on the kids and even adults), they fail to consider the grave peril of their own position (or &#8220;soul&#8221;):  what if they are wrong and there is no intrinsic &#8220;sin&#8221;?</p>
<p>Thus, in full discernment, there is a clear path from these considerations to equality-at-law (for *gays*, not &#8220;in general&#8221;), either by mercy or by right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amicus</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/03/30/31648/comment-page-1#comment-91765</link>
		<dc:creator>Amicus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 03:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=31648#comment-91765</guid>
		<description>Thank god there are people who are willing to share their experience of this stuff.

I found the guy who testified at the Prop8 trial absolutely compelling.

As best memory serves, there was a institute in Mexico, circa 2005?, that would take American kids in.  One of them testified that he was put in a room and told that he wouldn&#039;t be able to talk to his parents again until he was &quot;cured&quot;.

In other words, torture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank god there are people who are willing to share their experience of this stuff.</p>
<p>I found the guy who testified at the Prop8 trial absolutely compelling.</p>
<p>As best memory serves, there was a institute in Mexico, circa 2005?, that would take American kids in.  One of them testified that he was put in a room and told that he wouldn&#8217;t be able to talk to his parents again until he was &#8220;cured&#8221;.</p>
<p>In other words, torture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.J.</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/03/30/31648/comment-page-1#comment-91752</link>
		<dc:creator>T.J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 23:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=31648#comment-91752</guid>
		<description>No such thing as a homosexual. Right, just heterosexuals who struggle with same-sex attraction. It would be hillarious if it were not so sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No such thing as a homosexual. Right, just heterosexuals who struggle with same-sex attraction. It would be hillarious if it were not so sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
