<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A quote worth memorizing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/05/05/32360/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/05/05/32360</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:30:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: esurience</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/05/05/32360/comment-page-1#comment-93860</link>
		<dc:creator>esurience</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 02:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=32360#comment-93860</guid>
		<description>Michael,

Sure, but then the question becomes whether or not the substation of &#039;gay&#039; for something else is really a valid substitution.

Other things you might try and substitute it for actually cause demonstrable harm, whereas being gay doesn&#039;t...

You can&#039;t understand the completeness of the argument unless you truly understand what being gay means... and that understanding has to include that being gay isn&#039;t harmful in any way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,</p>
<p>Sure, but then the question becomes whether or not the substation of &#8216;gay&#8217; for something else is really a valid substitution.</p>
<p>Other things you might try and substitute it for actually cause demonstrable harm, whereas being gay doesn&#8217;t&#8230;</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t understand the completeness of the argument unless you truly understand what being gay means&#8230; and that understanding has to include that being gay isn&#8217;t harmful in any way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/05/05/32360/comment-page-1#comment-93856</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 01:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=32360#comment-93856</guid>
		<description>I know this is an emotional appeal and not a logical one, but it bothers me just how easily it can be turned on its head - simply substitute &quot;gay&quot; for any number of naturally occurring things that we would rather not believe have God&#039;s approval.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this is an emotional appeal and not a logical one, but it bothers me just how easily it can be turned on its head &#8211; simply substitute &#8220;gay&#8221; for any number of naturally occurring things that we would rather not believe have God&#8217;s approval.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
