<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Daily Agenda for Friday, June 24</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/06/24/34457/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/06/24/34457</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 11:50:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark F.</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/06/24/34457/comment-page-1#comment-96707</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=34457#comment-96707</guid>
		<description>Well Ryan, I hope you are right. I think patience is a virtue now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Ryan, I hope you are right. I think patience is a virtue now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/06/24/34457/comment-page-1#comment-96705</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=34457#comment-96705</guid>
		<description>@Mark F,

The difference now is several Dems are out of office that voted against marriage equality last time, and the ones who are still left have switched, (except for Diaz) plus there are probably several Republicans who would vote for it, too.  It&#039;s pretty clear that with Bloomberg behind it, it will pass, which is why the Repubs aren&#039;t going to allow a vote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mark F,</p>
<p>The difference now is several Dems are out of office that voted against marriage equality last time, and the ones who are still left have switched, (except for Diaz) plus there are probably several Republicans who would vote for it, too.  It&#8217;s pretty clear that with Bloomberg behind it, it will pass, which is why the Repubs aren&#8217;t going to allow a vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark F.</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/06/24/34457/comment-page-1#comment-96704</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=34457#comment-96704</guid>
		<description>&quot;We’ve got to take back the Senate in 2012 and try again then.&quot;

Yeah, that will guarantee success, just like all of the other times the Democrats had control of things! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We’ve got to take back the Senate in 2012 and try again then.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, that will guarantee success, just like all of the other times the Democrats had control of things! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/06/24/34457/comment-page-1#comment-96695</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 15:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=34457#comment-96695</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s definitely looking like we were snowed by the Repubs.  We&#039;ve got to take back the Senate in 2012 and try again then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s definitely looking like we were snowed by the Repubs.  We&#8217;ve got to take back the Senate in 2012 and try again then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/06/24/34457/comment-page-1#comment-96690</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=34457#comment-96690</guid>
		<description>I find it deeply saddening to see the New York senators willing to show themselves as vulnerable to pressure from opponents of marriage equality. I hate to think about the celebration of the &quot;triumph of family values&quot; that will be shouted from the organizations that spent so much money and time stirring up hate and fear. 

Edmund Burke said it perfectly: &quot;All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing&quot;...way to go, &quot;good men&quot; (and women) of New York.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it deeply saddening to see the New York senators willing to show themselves as vulnerable to pressure from opponents of marriage equality. I hate to think about the celebration of the &#8220;triumph of family values&#8221; that will be shouted from the organizations that spent so much money and time stirring up hate and fear. </p>
<p>Edmund Burke said it perfectly: &#8220;All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing&#8221;&#8230;way to go, &#8220;good men&#8221; (and women) of New York.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/06/24/34457/comment-page-1#comment-96686</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 11:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=34457#comment-96686</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m now sure there won&#039;t be a vote. As I stated before, that&#039;s the only way the Republicans win. Perhaps a short-term win, but a win nonetheless.

I still hope I&#039;m wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m now sure there won&#8217;t be a vote. As I stated before, that&#8217;s the only way the Republicans win. Perhaps a short-term win, but a win nonetheless.</p>
<p>I still hope I&#8217;m wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amicus</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/06/24/34457/comment-page-1#comment-96685</link>
		<dc:creator>Amicus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 10:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=34457#comment-96685</guid>
		<description>Greg Ball is out of it.  He released a stmt yesterday.

Turns out either he is an outright coward or knows that this will pass without him, so he&#039;s ducking.

What did he say?

in sum:  Now that the final text of the bill is out, I can say I worked for &quot;religious protections&quot;, but it doesn&#039;t include all the ones that I wanted.

What does he want?

If you guessed that, of course, he and his office don&#039;t/won&#039;t say, you would be right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg Ball is out of it.  He released a stmt yesterday.</p>
<p>Turns out either he is an outright coward or knows that this will pass without him, so he&#8217;s ducking.</p>
<p>What did he say?</p>
<p>in sum:  Now that the final text of the bill is out, I can say I worked for &#8220;religious protections&#8221;, but it doesn&#8217;t include all the ones that I wanted.</p>
<p>What does he want?</p>
<p>If you guessed that, of course, he and his office don&#8217;t/won&#8217;t say, you would be right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
