<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Huckabee Thinks GOP Too &#8220;Ideologically Pure&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/07/01/34765/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/07/01/34765</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:18:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/07/01/34765/comment-page-1#comment-97681</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 15:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=34765#comment-97681</guid>
		<description>The Republican Party has finally realized the bitter truth:  the extreme right-wing religious wing of the party has turned into a monster the traditional GOP regrets courting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Republican Party has finally realized the bitter truth:  the extreme right-wing religious wing of the party has turned into a monster the traditional GOP regrets courting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/07/01/34765/comment-page-1#comment-97581</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 22:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=34765#comment-97581</guid>
		<description>Nope.  Won&#039;t work.  One meaning of &quot;pure&quot; is &quot;unadulterated.&quot;  My impression is lots of Republicans, men at least, are, in fact, adulterated, if you get my meaning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope.  Won&#8217;t work.  One meaning of &#8220;pure&#8221; is &#8220;unadulterated.&#8221;  My impression is lots of Republicans, men at least, are, in fact, adulterated, if you get my meaning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/07/01/34765/comment-page-1#comment-97580</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 22:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=34765#comment-97580</guid>
		<description>@Richard Rush:  Would make a good name for a political action committee, one &quot;trying to unite the true conservatives in the Republican party&quot; or something like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Richard Rush:  Would make a good name for a political action committee, one &#8220;trying to unite the true conservatives in the Republican party&#8221; or something like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Rush</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/07/01/34765/comment-page-1#comment-97564</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Rush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 17:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=34765#comment-97564</guid>
		<description>Perhaps &lt;b&gt;GOPure&lt;/b&gt; would be a little more streamlined (more pure).
For purity-seekers, there is no such thing as being too pure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps <b>GOPure</b> would be a little more streamlined (more pure).<br />
For purity-seekers, there is no such thing as being too pure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Rush</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/07/01/34765/comment-page-1#comment-97558</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Rush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 14:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=34765#comment-97558</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;GOP&lt;/b&gt; now stands for &lt;b&gt;GOPurity&lt;/b&gt;.

The Grand Old Party died long ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>GOP</b> now stands for <b>GOPurity</b>.</p>
<p>The Grand Old Party died long ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jpeckjr</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/07/01/34765/comment-page-1#comment-97554</link>
		<dc:creator>jpeckjr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 13:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=34765#comment-97554</guid>
		<description>As MikeNOLA noted, the full article in Prospect (a UK publication) is well worth reading.

Overall, it describes well the complete confusion in the Republican party, perhaps, even, in the nation as a whole. Mr. Huckabee makes some valid points about corporate power in America and about govt&#039;s role in helping the poor.  His solution to all the problems we face, though, is smaller govt and free markets.  Except in areas of sexuality, where govt should play a stronger role in preserving the one man/one woman/lots of children family.

The idea that &quot;the rich elites are ruining this country and wouldn&#039;t it be great to be rich&quot; is a central theme of the article, not race or, for that matter, religion. 

Perhaps because the writer is from the UK, he was able to bring a perspective to the story an American writer would not.  Well worth reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As MikeNOLA noted, the full article in Prospect (a UK publication) is well worth reading.</p>
<p>Overall, it describes well the complete confusion in the Republican party, perhaps, even, in the nation as a whole. Mr. Huckabee makes some valid points about corporate power in America and about govt&#8217;s role in helping the poor.  His solution to all the problems we face, though, is smaller govt and free markets.  Except in areas of sexuality, where govt should play a stronger role in preserving the one man/one woman/lots of children family.</p>
<p>The idea that &#8220;the rich elites are ruining this country and wouldn&#8217;t it be great to be rich&#8221; is a central theme of the article, not race or, for that matter, religion. </p>
<p>Perhaps because the writer is from the UK, he was able to bring a perspective to the story an American writer would not.  Well worth reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/07/01/34765/comment-page-1#comment-97553</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 12:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=34765#comment-97553</guid>
		<description>You know, I&#039;m really okay with FRC and AFA telling people not to donate to the Republican National Committee.  In fact, I completely agree with them on that particular matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I&#8217;m really okay with FRC and AFA telling people not to donate to the Republican National Committee.  In fact, I completely agree with them on that particular matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MIKENOLA</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/07/01/34765/comment-page-1#comment-97542</link>
		<dc:creator>MIKENOLA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 04:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=34765#comment-97542</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s funny I just read the linked article on ideological purity 

(   http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/2011/06/america-right-huckabee-libertarian-evangelical-cruise/  ) 

from the above article and it is a very interesting piece. I don&#039;t know anything about the author or prospect magazine and their ideologies, but as an information piece it is pretty well done. 

One passage in particular was a bit disturbing considering the &quot;purity&quot; aspect of the southern baptists &amp; tea partiers on the cruise.

-------snip----------------

Maggie Benedict and Jinx Drda from suburban St Louis were also greatly disappointed to hear Huckabee had bowed out of the presidential race. They’ve always voted but it wasn’t until Obama’s victory that they became more active in politics.

“It’s the first time I’ve felt the president wasn’t a true American,” Maggie says. “And that he wants to become a dictator. We didn’t like seeing him get elected because of his race.”

---------------end snip-------------

The second paragraph, last line is a kicker.

Which way to they mean that? do they think Obama only won because he was black? or do they dislike him being elected because he is black?

Depending on how you take in the context of the preceding paragraphs, it certainly leans toward their old lily white Jeebus-luvin asses not liking the black guy for being black. 

we all know that publicly few of the right wing white folks are stupid enough to be publicly heard (near strangers with a mic) that they just don&#039;t like him cause he is black. but my take on this article is that these southern baptists (paying 6 grand no less) are not that politically correct in their public speech. They don&#039;t care if you hear them being racist or bigoted because Jeebus says it&#039;s okay to hate in his name...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s funny I just read the linked article on ideological purity </p>
<p>(   <a href="http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/2011/06/america-right-huckabee-libertarian-evangelical-cruise/" rel="nofollow">http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/2011/06/america-right-huckabee-libertarian-evangelical-cruise/</a>  ) </p>
<p>from the above article and it is a very interesting piece. I don&#8217;t know anything about the author or prospect magazine and their ideologies, but as an information piece it is pretty well done. </p>
<p>One passage in particular was a bit disturbing considering the &#8220;purity&#8221; aspect of the southern baptists &amp; tea partiers on the cruise.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;-snip&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Maggie Benedict and Jinx Drda from suburban St Louis were also greatly disappointed to hear Huckabee had bowed out of the presidential race. They’ve always voted but it wasn’t until Obama’s victory that they became more active in politics.</p>
<p>“It’s the first time I’ve felt the president wasn’t a true American,” Maggie says. “And that he wants to become a dictator. We didn’t like seeing him get elected because of his race.”</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;end snip&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>The second paragraph, last line is a kicker.</p>
<p>Which way to they mean that? do they think Obama only won because he was black? or do they dislike him being elected because he is black?</p>
<p>Depending on how you take in the context of the preceding paragraphs, it certainly leans toward their old lily white Jeebus-luvin asses not liking the black guy for being black. </p>
<p>we all know that publicly few of the right wing white folks are stupid enough to be publicly heard (near strangers with a mic) that they just don&#8217;t like him cause he is black. but my take on this article is that these southern baptists (paying 6 grand no less) are not that politically correct in their public speech. They don&#8217;t care if you hear them being racist or bigoted because Jeebus says it&#8217;s okay to hate in his name&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy (TRiG)</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/07/01/34765/comment-page-1#comment-97521</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy (TRiG)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 22:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=34765#comment-97521</guid>
		<description>But conservatism is all about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alternet.org/belief/146930/get_a_brain,_morons:_why_being_liberal_really_is_better_than_being_conservative/?page=entire&quot; title=&quot;Why Being Liberal Really Is Better Than Being Conservative&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;purity&lt;/a&gt; (along with authority and loyalty).

TRiG.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But conservatism is all about <a href="http://www.alternet.org/belief/146930/get_a_brain,_morons:_why_being_liberal_really_is_better_than_being_conservative/?page=entire" title="Why Being Liberal Really Is Better Than Being Conservative" rel="nofollow">purity</a> (along with authority and loyalty).</p>
<p>TRiG.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/07/01/34765/comment-page-1#comment-97500</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 20:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=34765#comment-97500</guid>
		<description>I thought I read the full text of the Huckabee &quot;purity&quot; critique in the GOP, and I got the impression that he&#039;s all on board with purity on social issues.  I think it&#039;s the Tea Party &quot;purity&quot; on budget/debt ceiling, etc. that&#039;s got him concerned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought I read the full text of the Huckabee &#8220;purity&#8221; critique in the GOP, and I got the impression that he&#8217;s all on board with purity on social issues.  I think it&#8217;s the Tea Party &#8220;purity&#8221; on budget/debt ceiling, etc. that&#8217;s got him concerned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
