<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Daily Agenda for Satuday, August 13</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/08/13/36089/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/08/13/36089</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:56:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CPT_Doom</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/08/13/36089/comment-page-1#comment-102357</link>
		<dc:creator>CPT_Doom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2011 16:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=36089#comment-102357</guid>
		<description>That BAR report is really amazing. We forget how hellish it was in the late 80s and early 90s. I was working for a healthcare consulting firm in the mid-90s and several of our clients were working on the new protease inhibitors. We had to keep a very tight seal on all the information we were getting about their clinical efficacy, because it was so striking (quite frankly, having seen some fraudulent claims by pharma companies in the past - in one case that even initially fooled the FDA - many of my colleagues didn&#039;t believe the data).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That BAR report is really amazing. We forget how hellish it was in the late 80s and early 90s. I was working for a healthcare consulting firm in the mid-90s and several of our clients were working on the new protease inhibitors. We had to keep a very tight seal on all the information we were getting about their clinical efficacy, because it was so striking (quite frankly, having seen some fraudulent claims by pharma companies in the past &#8211; in one case that even initially fooled the FDA &#8211; many of my colleagues didn&#8217;t believe the data).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
