<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NC Anti-Marriage Amendment Language Leaves Off Key Provision</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/09/22/37282/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/09/22/37282</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 16:00:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CPT_Doom</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/09/22/37282/comment-page-1#comment-106867</link>
		<dc:creator>CPT_Doom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 18:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=37282#comment-106867</guid>
		<description>So, in other words, NC wants to be like VA - the most anti-gay state (ok VA is a commonwealth) in the nation. AFAIK, VA is the only current jurisdiction that specifically bars private employers from providing DP benefits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, in other words, NC wants to be like VA &#8211; the most anti-gay state (ok VA is a commonwealth) in the nation. AFAIK, VA is the only current jurisdiction that specifically bars private employers from providing DP benefits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Other Fred in the UK</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/09/22/37282/comment-page-1#comment-106857</link>
		<dc:creator>Other Fred in the UK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 17:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=37282#comment-106857</guid>
		<description>State Rep. Rick Glazier admits he failed to read a State Constitutional Ammendment properly. I am the only one to be utterly amazed by his casualness with the State Constitution?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>State Rep. Rick Glazier admits he failed to read a State Constitutional Ammendment properly. I am the only one to be utterly amazed by his casualness with the State Constitution?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Kincaid</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/09/22/37282/comment-page-1#comment-106852</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Kincaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 16:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=37282#comment-106852</guid>
		<description>I smell an opportunity.  This is &quot;the government telling business what it can and cannot do&quot;.  

I&#039;m dreaming of an ad which uses language like &quot;busybody bureaucrats&quot; and &quot;petty dictators&quot;.  Sadly, I suspect its a daydream.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I smell an opportunity.  This is &#8220;the government telling business what it can and cannot do&#8221;.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m dreaming of an ad which uses language like &#8220;busybody bureaucrats&#8221; and &#8220;petty dictators&#8221;.  Sadly, I suspect its a daydream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: occono</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/09/22/37282/comment-page-1#comment-106849</link>
		<dc:creator>occono</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 15:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=37282#comment-106849</guid>
		<description>Gus: It isn&#039;t, but it may got &quot;lost in the rush&quot; to those who didn&#039;t support the language, it&#039;s not that it fell out or anything. But yeah, it was a deliberate attempt to conceal the removal of the language.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gus: It isn&#8217;t, but it may got &#8220;lost in the rush&#8221; to those who didn&#8217;t support the language, it&#8217;s not that it fell out or anything. But yeah, it was a deliberate attempt to conceal the removal of the language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gus</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/09/22/37282/comment-page-1#comment-106846</link>
		<dc:creator>Gus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 14:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=37282#comment-106846</guid>
		<description>Why do I think this is not a mistake?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do I think this is not a mistake?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
