<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Santorum Doubles Down on DADT, With No Apology Or Thanks To American Soldier</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/09/23/37351/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/09/23/37351</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:53:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomTallis</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/09/23/37351/comment-page-1#comment-107008</link>
		<dc:creator>TomTallis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 21:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=37351#comment-107008</guid>
		<description>He&#039;s issued an apology, claiming that he &quot;didn&#039;t hear&quot; any booing.

I think that we can all treat that statement with the contempt that it so richly deserves.

http://joemygod.blogspot.com/2011/09/frothy-mix-i-never-heard-any-boos.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s issued an apology, claiming that he &#8220;didn&#8217;t hear&#8221; any booing.</p>
<p>I think that we can all treat that statement with the contempt that it so richly deserves.</p>
<p><a href="http://joemygod.blogspot.com/2011/09/frothy-mix-i-never-heard-any-boos.html" rel="nofollow">http://joemygod.blogspot.com/2011/09/frothy-mix-i-never-heard-any-boos.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Kincaid</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/09/23/37351/comment-page-1#comment-107004</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Kincaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 20:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=37351#comment-107004</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Can you even begin to imagine the hissy fit we would be hearing right now if any American active-duty soldier currently stationed in Iraq had been booed at a Democratic debate?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It would have been hyperbolic, relentless, and personal.

I&#039;m furious.

This goes beyond Santorum.  It wasn&#039;t Santorum booing... it was &quot;the people of the Republican Party.&quot;

The leadership of the Republican Party now has an obligation to correct the image that was created at the debate.  If, that is, they have any desire to do so.  

And if they are afraid of offending haters by calling them on their hate, then they are complicit.  You either oppose evil or you own it.

I have long been reluctant to automatically equate Republicans with homophobia and hatred.  I know many good Republicans who have no animus towards gay people.

But a default position has been set.  In my mind, &quot;Republican&quot; now means &quot;hates gay people&quot; unless there is some indication otherwise.  Not because of the handful of booers, but because no one has called it what it is: hatred, unacceptable, and not a value that anyone of any party should view with anything but contempt.

As long as it is &quot;unfortunate&quot; or &quot;ill advised&quot; or &quot;lacking in respect&quot; then it is an oopsie, a faux pas.

No.  This was not a faux pas.

It was people booing someone who is risking his life for them. And the reason they booed is because they felt comfortable in doing so.  They assumed that those around them would not find their boos to be objectionable.


So far it seems that they assumed correctly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Can you even begin to imagine the hissy fit we would be hearing right now if any American active-duty soldier currently stationed in Iraq had been booed at a Democratic debate?</p></blockquote>
<p>It would have been hyperbolic, relentless, and personal.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m furious.</p>
<p>This goes beyond Santorum.  It wasn&#8217;t Santorum booing&#8230; it was &#8220;the people of the Republican Party.&#8221;</p>
<p>The leadership of the Republican Party now has an obligation to correct the image that was created at the debate.  If, that is, they have any desire to do so.  </p>
<p>And if they are afraid of offending haters by calling them on their hate, then they are complicit.  You either oppose evil or you own it.</p>
<p>I have long been reluctant to automatically equate Republicans with homophobia and hatred.  I know many good Republicans who have no animus towards gay people.</p>
<p>But a default position has been set.  In my mind, &#8220;Republican&#8221; now means &#8220;hates gay people&#8221; unless there is some indication otherwise.  Not because of the handful of booers, but because no one has called it what it is: hatred, unacceptable, and not a value that anyone of any party should view with anything but contempt.</p>
<p>As long as it is &#8220;unfortunate&#8221; or &#8220;ill advised&#8221; or &#8220;lacking in respect&#8221; then it is an oopsie, a faux pas.</p>
<p>No.  This was not a faux pas.</p>
<p>It was people booing someone who is risking his life for them. And the reason they booed is because they felt comfortable in doing so.  They assumed that those around them would not find their boos to be objectionable.</p>
<p>So far it seems that they assumed correctly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/09/23/37351/comment-page-1#comment-106997</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 20:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=37351#comment-106997</guid>
		<description>How long before he starts &quot;frothing&quot; at the mouth?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How long before he starts &#8220;frothing&#8221; at the mouth?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Priya Lynn</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/09/23/37351/comment-page-1#comment-106990</link>
		<dc:creator>Priya Lynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 19:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=37351#comment-106990</guid>
		<description>Christopher they usurped good government with their sheer numbers - there&#039;s a lot of bigots in the U.S., there&#039;s no mystery to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christopher they usurped good government with their sheer numbers &#8211; there&#8217;s a lot of bigots in the U.S., there&#8217;s no mystery to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/09/23/37351/comment-page-1#comment-106988</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 18:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=37351#comment-106988</guid>
		<description>I posted this earlier, but am moved to repeat myself:

As a citizen of Canada, I find this man insulting to me and all other world militaries that are not only gay-positive, but US allies.

Xenophobia, thy name is America, quickly on its way to being Margaret Atwood’s Republic of Gillead as found in her novel “The Handmaid’s Tale”.

All religion and no common sense.

How you have let these people usurp good government and determine social policy baffles us all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I posted this earlier, but am moved to repeat myself:</p>
<p>As a citizen of Canada, I find this man insulting to me and all other world militaries that are not only gay-positive, but US allies.</p>
<p>Xenophobia, thy name is America, quickly on its way to being Margaret Atwood’s Republic of Gillead as found in her novel “The Handmaid’s Tale”.</p>
<p>All religion and no common sense.</p>
<p>How you have let these people usurp good government and determine social policy baffles us all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben In Oakland</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/09/23/37351/comment-page-1#comment-106981</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben In Oakland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 18:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=37351#comment-106981</guid>
		<description>Frankly, it is an even BIGGBER shock to me that no one has called santorum on his propagandic statement that the end of DADT is the exact cognate and equivalent of &quot;sexual activity&quot; in the military, and that this is somehiow a special right that only gay people get to enjoy.

Somehow, even the existence of principled republicans like Gary Johnston and Jon Huntsman could EVER get me to vote for any republican, ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankly, it is an even BIGGBER shock to me that no one has called santorum on his propagandic statement that the end of DADT is the exact cognate and equivalent of &#8220;sexual activity&#8221; in the military, and that this is somehiow a special right that only gay people get to enjoy.</p>
<p>Somehow, even the existence of principled republicans like Gary Johnston and Jon Huntsman could EVER get me to vote for any republican, ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry T</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/09/23/37351/comment-page-1#comment-106978</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 17:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=37351#comment-106978</guid>
		<description>Sounds like he&#039;s trying to make sure his name remains what it means when Googled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like he&#8217;s trying to make sure his name remains what it means when Googled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
