<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Establishment Clauses For The Ugandan Inquisition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/02/24/42331/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/02/24/42331</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 20:55:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/02/24/42331/comment-page-1#comment-118390</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=42331#comment-118390</guid>
		<description>This posting got me thinking about an earlier one in this series about bans on gay advocacy. Something that far-reaching would also mean that any Member of Parliament who attempts to repeal the law would be a gay advocate and liable to be prosecuted. Thus it is a law that can&#039;t be repealed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This posting got me thinking about an earlier one in this series about bans on gay advocacy. Something that far-reaching would also mean that any Member of Parliament who attempts to repeal the law would be a gay advocate and liable to be prosecuted. Thus it is a law that can&#8217;t be repealed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
