<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Giuliani: Republicans not modern enough</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/03/01/42547/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/03/01/42547</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 20:17:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/03/01/42547/comment-page-1#comment-118838</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 19:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=42547#comment-118838</guid>
		<description>The problem with GOP in gay circles is that there is often a reflexive reductionist opposition to all things Republican.  That means they don&#039;t get the credit for things they do right (when they do them right), and the leads to the advancement of more of the lunatic right.  If we don&#039;t support moderates (where possible), then they will not flourish, and then our ONLY choice is to run to the Dems, who may or may not win against the GOP.  It&#039;s far better to be under both tents than to have to beg for shelter in only one.  

That said, the GOP has a lot of answering to do.  Guiliani has at times been a friend, but at other times he has not, particularly on the issue of gay marriage.  If it&#039;s a choice between Guiliani and most Dems, then the Dems are clearly the better friend to us.  If it&#039;s a choice between Guiliani and the average Republican, however, he&#039;s an ally.  

Difficult to parse, but absolutely required if we&#039;re going to get anywhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with GOP in gay circles is that there is often a reflexive reductionist opposition to all things Republican.  That means they don&#8217;t get the credit for things they do right (when they do them right), and the leads to the advancement of more of the lunatic right.  If we don&#8217;t support moderates (where possible), then they will not flourish, and then our ONLY choice is to run to the Dems, who may or may not win against the GOP.  It&#8217;s far better to be under both tents than to have to beg for shelter in only one.  </p>
<p>That said, the GOP has a lot of answering to do.  Guiliani has at times been a friend, but at other times he has not, particularly on the issue of gay marriage.  If it&#8217;s a choice between Guiliani and most Dems, then the Dems are clearly the better friend to us.  If it&#8217;s a choice between Guiliani and the average Republican, however, he&#8217;s an ally.  </p>
<p>Difficult to parse, but absolutely required if we&#8217;re going to get anywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reed</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/03/01/42547/comment-page-1#comment-118820</link>
		<dc:creator>Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 17:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=42547#comment-118820</guid>
		<description>Your cynical side?  I thought this WAS your cynical side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your cynical side?  I thought this WAS your cynical side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucrece</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/03/01/42547/comment-page-1#comment-118786</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucrece</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 02:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=42547#comment-118786</guid>
		<description>Ugh, why Burnett. That woman is scourge upon journalism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh, why Burnett. That woman is scourge upon journalism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
