Box Turtle Bulletin

Box Turtle BulletinNews, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric
“Now you must raise your children up in a world where that union of man and box turtle is on the same legal footing as man and wife…”
This article can be found at:
Latest Posts

The Daily Agenda for Monday, March 5

Jim Burroway

March 5th, 2012

THIS MONTH IN HISTORY:
Statistics on Homosexuality Convictions: 1914. The American Journal of Urology had become increasingly focused on sexual matters as the new century progressed, so much so that in April 1914 the journal would modify its name to American Journal of Urology and Sexology. In the last month under the old title, Douglas C. McMurtrie, who wrote a regular column called “Department of Sexology,” listed the following statistics on convictions for “Crimes Against Nature”:

STATISTICS regarding all crimes in the United States are miserably defective and the results attending an effort to determine the frequency of the offence of sodomy, generally designated as an “offence against nature” is unsatisfactory. We find, however, that on June 80, 1904, there were in American penal institutions 376 prisoners committed for this crime. These prisoners comprised 15.5% of those committed for offences against chastity. Of the total 375 were male and 1 female.

The distribution by states was as follows: New Hampshire, 1; Massachusetts, 20; Connecticut, 7; New York, 62; New Jersey, 12; Pennsylvania, 52; Maryland, 8; Virginia, 3; West Virginia, 1; North Carolina, 4; South Carolina, 1; Georgia, 1; Florida, 3; Ohio, 22; Indiana, 6; Illinois, 20; Michigan, 11; Wisconsin, 6; Minnesota, 8; Iowa, 2; Missouri, 11; North Dakota, 2; Nebraska, 2; Kansas, 4; Kentucky, 6; Tennessee, 5; Alabama, 3; Mississippi, 6; Louisiana, 3; Texas, 29; Montana, 4; Wyoming, 2; Colorado, 5; Arizona, 1; Utah, 2; Idaho, 2 ; Washington, 8; Oregon, 1; California, 30. It will be seen that the frequency of conviction varies greatly in different localities.

In the figures of crime given for the state of Indiana, which are probably the most complete available, the offence in question is not mentioned. In the Indianapolis police court, however there were two cases of sodomy in 1910 and ten in 1911.

[From Douglas C. McMurtrie. "Statistics of Sodomy" American Journal of Urology 10, no. 3 (March 1914): 146]

If you know of something that belongs on the agenda, please send it here. Don’t forget to include the basics: who, what, when, where, and URL (if available).

And feel free to consider this your open thread for the day. What’s happening in your world?

Comments

POST COMMENT | COMMENT RSS 2.0

Regan DuCasse
March 5th, 2012 | LINK

I had to do some research for a paper on the incarceration rates of minorities. And I decided cross reference the incarceration, parole or sentencing rates for gays and lesbians in comparison to heterosexuals for the same crimes.
It wasn’t easy since some penal institutions may or may not have that information available about inmates, such as in the case of those arrested for sodomy or “crimes against nature”, because their homosexuality was a crime unto itself.

There was however, a trend of harsher sentencing, less parole or probationary options among gay men in particular. Even for non violent crime, or misdemeanor or second degree felony assault charges (usually domestic violence).

Of major crimes, the demographics that involve gay convicts is essentially very rare. And those CAPITAL crimes that involved gays and lesbians where execution was their sentence, they were in fact executed (and also so rare, they were notorious). Commutations being non existent for gay and lesbian killers.

It’s still very difficult for gay and lesbian victims to receive commiserate justice against their killers or property crimes. And no het man has ever been executed for the murder of someone gay, no matter if first degree or not, compared to sentencing and it’s application in similar cases.

More cross referencing revealed that this has been very similar in the way investigation and incarceration or sentencing rates in the Bible Belt were against, INTRA or INTER racial crimes in the Jim Crow states.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.