<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lambda Legal Sues Ohio School</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/04/03/43322/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/04/03/43322</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 02:59:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: WMDKitty</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/04/03/43322/comment-page-1#comment-120761</link>
		<dc:creator>WMDKitty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 04:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=43322#comment-120761</guid>
		<description>The fish is rather yonic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fish is rather yonic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gar</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/04/03/43322/comment-page-1#comment-120757</link>
		<dc:creator>gar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 01:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=43322#comment-120757</guid>
		<description>Well, I don&#039;t know.  That fish DOES look like a rainbow sperm cell or something. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I don&#8217;t know.  That fish DOES look like a rainbow sperm cell or something. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnAGJ</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/04/03/43322/comment-page-1#comment-120754</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnAGJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 00:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=43322#comment-120754</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s the rainbow fish, isn&#039;t it?

Kind of reminds one of circuit parties and go-go boys.

/sarc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the rainbow fish, isn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>Kind of reminds one of circuit parties and go-go boys.</p>
<p>/sarc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snowman</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/04/03/43322/comment-page-1#comment-120748</link>
		<dc:creator>Snowman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 21:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=43322#comment-120748</guid>
		<description>So case law should be pretty clear, obviously a pro-gay shirt would also be allowed per the same ruling. For that matter...I wonder if a &quot;secular&quot; pro-gay shirt might not have provoked the same reaction? It seems as if the principal was offended more because the shirt said that about Jesus but that&#039;s just the vibe I get. 

I&#039;ve actually had the experience of a fundamentalist getting angry with me because I hold the viewpoint that a lot of &quot;secular&quot; values are more Christian than the ones the Christians are pushing these days. The same person seemed to feel more threatened by liberal Christians than by Atheists. She took the side of an Atheist in an argument against a liberal Christian at least once to my knowledge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So case law should be pretty clear, obviously a pro-gay shirt would also be allowed per the same ruling. For that matter&#8230;I wonder if a &#8220;secular&#8221; pro-gay shirt might not have provoked the same reaction? It seems as if the principal was offended more because the shirt said that about Jesus but that&#8217;s just the vibe I get. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve actually had the experience of a fundamentalist getting angry with me because I hold the viewpoint that a lot of &#8220;secular&#8221; values are more Christian than the ones the Christians are pushing these days. The same person seemed to feel more threatened by liberal Christians than by Atheists. She took the side of an Atheist in an argument against a liberal Christian at least once to my knowledge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Priya Lynn</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/04/03/43322/comment-page-1#comment-120729</link>
		<dc:creator>Priya Lynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 15:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=43322#comment-120729</guid>
		<description>David said &quot;Can a Christian wear a “Homosexuality is a sin.” t-shirt?&quot;

Yes.  There was a case a few years back where the school prevented a student from wearing an anti-gay t-shirt.  The child sued and won the right to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David said &#8220;Can a Christian wear a “Homosexuality is a sin.” t-shirt?&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes.  There was a case a few years back where the school prevented a student from wearing an anti-gay t-shirt.  The child sued and won the right to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David in Houston</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/04/03/43322/comment-page-1#comment-120728</link>
		<dc:creator>David in Houston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 15:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=43322#comment-120728</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m actually surprised that Lambda is able to make a case for this. I thought schools had the right to control what students wear. Such as banning gang colors (types of clothing), or even forcing students to wear uniforms. If a girl went to school wearing a string bikini, the school would force her to change clothes or get suspended. Where exactly do you draw the line?

Yes, the &quot;shirt is sexual in nature&quot; response is laughable. But I&#039;m curious how much leeway schools have when it comes to &quot;message&quot; shirts? Can a Christian wear a &quot;Homosexuality is a sin.&quot; t-shirt?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m actually surprised that Lambda is able to make a case for this. I thought schools had the right to control what students wear. Such as banning gang colors (types of clothing), or even forcing students to wear uniforms. If a girl went to school wearing a string bikini, the school would force her to change clothes or get suspended. Where exactly do you draw the line?</p>
<p>Yes, the &#8220;shirt is sexual in nature&#8221; response is laughable. But I&#8217;m curious how much leeway schools have when it comes to &#8220;message&#8221; shirts? Can a Christian wear a &#8220;Homosexuality is a sin.&#8221; t-shirt?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/04/03/43322/comment-page-1#comment-120727</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 15:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=43322#comment-120727</guid>
		<description>Well, doesn&#039;t the opening on the little fish symbol kind of maybe sort of looks like either an opening waiting for something to be inserted into it, or kind of maybe sort of like a tongue extending out to lick something . . . like . . . you know, an ice cream cone.  Yeah, a long, drippy, ice cream cone.  We&#039;ll just call it that for now, so we don&#039;t get too, you know, sexual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, doesn&#8217;t the opening on the little fish symbol kind of maybe sort of looks like either an opening waiting for something to be inserted into it, or kind of maybe sort of like a tongue extending out to lick something . . . like . . . you know, an ice cream cone.  Yeah, a long, drippy, ice cream cone.  We&#8217;ll just call it that for now, so we don&#8217;t get too, you know, sexual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
