<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bono Mack on Chaz</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/05/01/43950/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/05/01/43950</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 21:32:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/05/01/43950/comment-page-1#comment-122684</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 09:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=43950#comment-122684</guid>
		<description>Ray, I don&#039;t think I like your tone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ray, I don&#8217;t think I like your tone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/05/01/43950/comment-page-1#comment-122623</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 20:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=43950#comment-122623</guid>
		<description>Oh! And isn&#039;t this choice information.  Richard Grenell gets canned by the Romney campaign and guess who he working for today?  Mary Bono-Mack.  

Isn&#039;t that just what we need here where gay Republicans come to die - a GOProud, self-loathing gay-hating homo working to re-elect Mary Bono-Mack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh! And isn&#8217;t this choice information.  Richard Grenell gets canned by the Romney campaign and guess who he working for today?  Mary Bono-Mack.  </p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t that just what we need here where gay Republicans come to die &#8211; a GOProud, self-loathing gay-hating homo working to re-elect Mary Bono-Mack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/05/01/43950/comment-page-1#comment-122621</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 20:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=43950#comment-122621</guid>
		<description>The problem with Bono-Mack is you never know WHAT her position is.  She dodges questions on equality practically every time they are posed and she GLADLY accepted the endorsement of GOProud (remember them - the gay John Birch Society) - even had a special meeting with them to give them some love.  As a conservative, Bono is someone I&#039;d **like** to vote for but when it come to actually standing up for gays publicly, she always behaves like she&#039;s afraid of offending her millionaire campaign contributors.  And really, just who does she represent when she spends half of time in Florida with her husband.  Here&#039;s the real reason Bono-Mack prevails here in the desert - the local newspaper is a right-wing mouthpiece that maintains a virtual blackout on any criticism of of the Right.  Bono-Mack is in the pocket of Grover Norquist and that&#039;s all you need to know about her. She doesn&#039;t think for herself. She thinks what her handlers allow her to think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with Bono-Mack is you never know WHAT her position is.  She dodges questions on equality practically every time they are posed and she GLADLY accepted the endorsement of GOProud (remember them &#8211; the gay John Birch Society) &#8211; even had a special meeting with them to give them some love.  As a conservative, Bono is someone I&#8217;d **like** to vote for but when it come to actually standing up for gays publicly, she always behaves like she&#8217;s afraid of offending her millionaire campaign contributors.  And really, just who does she represent when she spends half of time in Florida with her husband.  Here&#8217;s the real reason Bono-Mack prevails here in the desert &#8211; the local newspaper is a right-wing mouthpiece that maintains a virtual blackout on any criticism of of the Right.  Bono-Mack is in the pocket of Grover Norquist and that&#8217;s all you need to know about her. She doesn&#8217;t think for herself. She thinks what her handlers allow her to think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Kincaid</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/05/01/43950/comment-page-1#comment-122528</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Kincaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 01:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=43950#comment-122528</guid>
		<description>David and Zack, thanks guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David and Zack, thanks guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TampaZeke</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/05/01/43950/comment-page-1#comment-122511</link>
		<dc:creator>TampaZeke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 23:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=43950#comment-122511</guid>
		<description>I was not being intentionally misleading.  I just remembered the headlines about her voting against a bill to repeal DADT.  I don&#039;t remember hearing that she later voted for the stand alone bill.  Sorry for the misinformation.  Thanks for correcting me with the facts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was not being intentionally misleading.  I just remembered the headlines about her voting against a bill to repeal DADT.  I don&#8217;t remember hearing that she later voted for the stand alone bill.  Sorry for the misinformation.  Thanks for correcting me with the facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Waite</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/05/01/43950/comment-page-1#comment-122508</link>
		<dc:creator>David Waite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 23:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=43950#comment-122508</guid>
		<description>Thank you twice, Tim. Your column warmed my heart and put a big smile on my face, and your comment correcting that misperception of her vote to repeal DADT was even better. I&#039;m the kind of Democrat who detests distortions of the record of any party&#039;s individual elected member. The names of the Republicans who voted for repeal are &quot;graven on my heart.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you twice, Tim. Your column warmed my heart and put a big smile on my face, and your comment correcting that misperception of her vote to repeal DADT was even better. I&#8217;m the kind of Democrat who detests distortions of the record of any party&#8217;s individual elected member. The names of the Republicans who voted for repeal are &#8220;graven on my heart.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Kincaid</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/05/01/43950/comment-page-1#comment-122493</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Kincaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 19:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=43950#comment-122493</guid>
		<description>Zeke,

You are either factually mistaken or not exactly telling the full story.  

There was a May 2010 vote that was tied to a bill that had a large number of controversial issues.  Bono Mack voted no, as did a large number of Congressional representatives.  It is less than accurate to assert that this was a vote &quot;AGAINST the repeal of DADT.&quot;

We need not speculate, guess, conjecture, or attribute her motives, because on December 15, 2010 the question was answered.  A stand-alone bill to repeal DADT was passed by the house.  This one had no other issues but was solely about the repeal of DADT.

&lt;blockquote&gt;In addition to Reps. Judy Biggert (R-Ill.), Anh &#039;Joseph&#039; Cao (R-La.), Charles Djou (R-Hawaii), Ron Paul (R-Texas) and Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.) -- who voted for the repeal amendment in May -- ten additional Republicans supported repeal today. They were Reps. Mary Bono Mack (R-Calif.), John Campbell (R-Calif.), Mike Castle (R-Del.) Charlie Dent (R-Pa.), Lincoln Diaz-Balart (R-Fla.), David Dreier (R-Calif.), Vernon Ehlers (R-Mich.), Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.), Todd Platts (R-Pa.) and Dave Reichart (R-Wash.).&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Bono Mack voted FOR the repeal of DADT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zeke,</p>
<p>You are either factually mistaken or not exactly telling the full story.  </p>
<p>There was a May 2010 vote that was tied to a bill that had a large number of controversial issues.  Bono Mack voted no, as did a large number of Congressional representatives.  It is less than accurate to assert that this was a vote &#8220;AGAINST the repeal of DADT.&#8221;</p>
<p>We need not speculate, guess, conjecture, or attribute her motives, because on December 15, 2010 the question was answered.  A stand-alone bill to repeal DADT was passed by the house.  This one had no other issues but was solely about the repeal of DADT.</p>
<blockquote><p>In addition to Reps. Judy Biggert (R-Ill.), Anh &#8216;Joseph&#8217; Cao (R-La.), Charles Djou (R-Hawaii), Ron Paul (R-Texas) and Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.) &#8212; who voted for the repeal amendment in May &#8212; ten additional Republicans supported repeal today. They were Reps. Mary Bono Mack (R-Calif.), John Campbell (R-Calif.), Mike Castle (R-Del.) Charlie Dent (R-Pa.), Lincoln Diaz-Balart (R-Fla.), David Dreier (R-Calif.), Vernon Ehlers (R-Mich.), Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.), Todd Platts (R-Pa.) and Dave Reichart (R-Wash.).</p></blockquote>
<p>Bono Mack voted FOR the repeal of DADT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TampaZeke</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/05/01/43950/comment-page-1#comment-122487</link>
		<dc:creator>TampaZeke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 18:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=43950#comment-122487</guid>
		<description>Among her mixed record is her RECENT vote AGAINST the repeal of DADT even though over 70% of Americans supported the move.

She is still no friend to the GLBT community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Among her mixed record is her RECENT vote AGAINST the repeal of DADT even though over 70% of Americans supported the move.</p>
<p>She is still no friend to the GLBT community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
