Mitt, please go through the list of 1138 federal benefits and let us know which ones are appropriate in your view. After you do that go through the benefits afforded married people by each state individually and let us know about those too. This will be a never-ending task for you since you will be taking literally thousands of positions that you will be forced to flip flop on when you hear from your overlords.

“He can’t look like that. That’s wrong. Just look at him!” an incensed Romney told Matthew Friedemann…

Romney still feels that he’s entitled to decide how people should live their lives, and looks at the rest of us from an arrogant position of assumed privilege that comes at the expense of “others”.

…imagine the things presidents would do and actually do, knowing they can get away with it.

Wow. That sounds like an opinion from apartheid South Africa… shameless discrimination, willful ignorance, deciding what are appropriate limits for “others” in the enjoyment of their rights, disregarding all differing opinions/reasoning with more merit… dude could easily be a misogynist and or racist too… trying to make discrimination sound justifiable, like South Africa’s last white president recently sugar coating apartheid on CNN and feeling elevated enough to decide what qualified as fair treatment for black South Africans who he shockingly claims were not disenfranchised by apartheid… totally unacceptable, not just in 2012.

There are those who stubbornly refuse to evolve, and like my elderly neighbor discovered – holding on to discrimination while the rest of the world evolves has a high cost – I pitied him but he was more comfortable living in his own stale bubble of discrimination and he even attempted marketing it to others rather than moving on and living in the present.

May Romney and all others who are against equality suffer the kind of isolation and loneliness that would force them to evolve

But, alas, Romney is pandering to AFA-types. Just for the votes.

High-stakes politics can make some people do weird things. One takes nebulous actions to further his campaign and the other finally owns up to doing the honorable thing.

This is an historic day. One part of Obama’s legacy will now be forever etched (and not sketched) in the history books.

For example, is it appropriate to tax a gay widower into the ground as he “inherits” the home he and his now-deceased spouse built together?

Is it appropriate to tax the gay widower’s “inheritence” as he is not the spouse of the deceased?

Is it appropriate to withhold Social Security payments from gay widowers?

Pray, Mitt, tell us exactly which benefits you want believe should be withheld from grieving f—-ts.

Because, I promise you, marriage benefits are great while both people are alive. But they’re *NECESSARY* when one of us dies.