<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Obama&#8217;s Support for Marriage Equality Matters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/05/10/44314/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/05/10/44314</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:18:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Priya Lynn</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/05/10/44314/comment-page-1#comment-123288</link>
		<dc:creator>Priya Lynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 21:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=44314#comment-123288</guid>
		<description>Michael, if the Democrats don&#039;t put marriage equality in their platform then they simply get out of the way to allow Republicans to increasingly add laws to cement marriage discrimination in society.  The only way the Democrats can be non-partisan about marriage equality is if the Republicans agree to do so as well and they will never do that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael, if the Democrats don&#8217;t put marriage equality in their platform then they simply get out of the way to allow Republicans to increasingly add laws to cement marriage discrimination in society.  The only way the Democrats can be non-partisan about marriage equality is if the Republicans agree to do so as well and they will never do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan F</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/05/10/44314/comment-page-1#comment-123287</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 21:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=44314#comment-123287</guid>
		<description>The Republicans already oppose equality. Their platform opposed marriage equality in every election since 1992.

The majority of Democrats (and independents) support marriage equality. They&#039;d be foolish not to include it in the platform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Republicans already oppose equality. Their platform opposed marriage equality in every election since 1992.</p>
<p>The majority of Democrats (and independents) support marriage equality. They&#8217;d be foolish not to include it in the platform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael C</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/05/10/44314/comment-page-1#comment-123268</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 19:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=44314#comment-123268</guid>
		<description>I am hesitant to endorse including marriage equality in the Democratic platform simply because it should not be a partisan issue. By drawing party lines on marriage, we are encouraging Republicans to oppose equality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am hesitant to endorse including marriage equality in the Democratic platform simply because it should not be a partisan issue. By drawing party lines on marriage, we are encouraging Republicans to oppose equality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
