<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Daily Agenda for Tuesday, May 15</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/05/15/44396/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/05/15/44396</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 06:37:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ Manley</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/05/15/44396/comment-page-1#comment-123610</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Manley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 19:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=44396#comment-123610</guid>
		<description>I looked up the original article too, and for anyone else who&#039;s interested, it&#039;s at http://books.google.com/books?id=Nn-ySVOZaSQC&amp;pg=PA86&amp;dq=%22thomas+jefferson+withers%22+homosexual&amp;hl=en&amp;sa=X&amp;ei=yqCyT-zPKe7q2wWM2K3pCA&amp;ved=0CD8Q6AEwAQ#v=onepage&amp;q&amp;f=false.  

Duberman, the researcher who published the letters, gets too intellectual in his analysis, and totally unrealistic about some &quot;widespread tolerance&quot; of male-male screwing around in the Old South - but the references to &quot;fleshen poles&quot; and &quot;she-males&quot; are delicious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I looked up the original article too, and for anyone else who&#8217;s interested, it&#8217;s at <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=Nn-ySVOZaSQC&#038;pg=PA86&#038;dq=%22thomas+jefferson+withers%22+homosexual&#038;hl=en&#038;sa=X&#038;ei=yqCyT-zPKe7q2wWM2K3pCA&#038;ved=0CD8Q6AEwAQ#v=onepage&#038;q&#038;f=false" rel="nofollow">http://books.google.com/books?id=Nn-ySVOZaSQC&#038;pg=PA86&#038;dq=%22thomas+jefferson+withers%22+homosexual&#038;hl=en&#038;sa=X&#038;ei=yqCyT-zPKe7q2wWM2K3pCA&#038;ved=0CD8Q6AEwAQ#v=onepage&#038;q&#038;f=false</a>.  </p>
<p>Duberman, the researcher who published the letters, gets too intellectual in his analysis, and totally unrealistic about some &#8220;widespread tolerance&#8221; of male-male screwing around in the Old South &#8211; but the references to &#8220;fleshen poles&#8221; and &#8220;she-males&#8221; are delicious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: customartist</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/05/15/44396/comment-page-1#comment-123591</link>
		<dc:creator>customartist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 14:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=44396#comment-123591</guid>
		<description>What is the timeframe for the next step in the Prop 8 case? Anyone?? 

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the timeframe for the next step in the Prop 8 case? Anyone?? </p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chiMaxx</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/05/15/44396/comment-page-1#comment-123584</link>
		<dc:creator>chiMaxx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 12:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=44396#comment-123584</guid>
		<description>Your quote from the Withers-Hammond letters led me to look up the original article by Duberman (rather than waiting til September for you to publish it, as you suggested). The letters are fascinating. However, your note is incorrect: The September letter is not Hammond&#039;s response to Withers but a second letter from Withers to Hammond. The correspondence going from Hammond to Withers has not been published and may not have been preserved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your quote from the Withers-Hammond letters led me to look up the original article by Duberman (rather than waiting til September for you to publish it, as you suggested). The letters are fascinating. However, your note is incorrect: The September letter is not Hammond&#8217;s response to Withers but a second letter from Withers to Hammond. The correspondence going from Hammond to Withers has not been published and may not have been preserved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/05/15/44396/comment-page-1#comment-123579</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 11:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=44396#comment-123579</guid>
		<description>Jasper Johns is something of a legend in our family history.  He was tutored by my grandmother and lived with his first cousin for a time, who was a great friend of my father.  My grandmother would  confiscate Jasper&#039;s doodlngs which were beautiful and put them in the trash can.  Something she later deeply regretted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jasper Johns is something of a legend in our family history.  He was tutored by my grandmother and lived with his first cousin for a time, who was a great friend of my father.  My grandmother would  confiscate Jasper&#8217;s doodlngs which were beautiful and put them in the trash can.  Something she later deeply regretted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
