<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another ABC Poll, yet more good marriage news</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/05/23/44802/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/05/23/44802</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 21:18:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/05/23/44802/comment-page-1#comment-124255</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 20:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=44802#comment-124255</guid>
		<description>And the whole time he was running I thought the &#039;ole Frothy Mix would be MY undoing. 

Man was I wrong... 7% strongly for gap... my oh my... When I was a kid I never thought I&#039;d get married, then I thought I&#039;d get married but it&#039;d never be recognized in my hometown, now... man. The sky&#039;s the limit. 

Although I can&#039;t silence my inner skeptic: another way to read that poll (especially in the light of the NC results which were so far off the poll numbers) is that a large portion of that 8% who are worried about their hair-do probably think gay marriage is a terrible idea but are too polite to say so out-loud. 

That cross-over to the No camp may even bleed into the &quot;somewhat legal&quot; category. Perhaps some of those somewhats go for NO on the question of gay marriage and YES on the question of civil unions. I&#039;m a little curious why they didn&#039;t structure civil unions into the poll.

Not to rain on the parade though; this poll is good news no matter what way one slices it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the whole time he was running I thought the &#8216;ole Frothy Mix would be MY undoing. </p>
<p>Man was I wrong&#8230; 7% strongly for gap&#8230; my oh my&#8230; When I was a kid I never thought I&#8217;d get married, then I thought I&#8217;d get married but it&#8217;d never be recognized in my hometown, now&#8230; man. The sky&#8217;s the limit. </p>
<p>Although I can&#8217;t silence my inner skeptic: another way to read that poll (especially in the light of the NC results which were so far off the poll numbers) is that a large portion of that 8% who are worried about their hair-do probably think gay marriage is a terrible idea but are too polite to say so out-loud. </p>
<p>That cross-over to the No camp may even bleed into the &#8220;somewhat legal&#8221; category. Perhaps some of those somewhats go for NO on the question of gay marriage and YES on the question of civil unions. I&#8217;m a little curious why they didn&#8217;t structure civil unions into the poll.</p>
<p>Not to rain on the parade though; this poll is good news no matter what way one slices it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
