<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brian Brown Accepts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/05/29/45066/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/05/29/45066</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 14:07:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donny D.</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/05/29/45066/comment-page-1#comment-124821</link>
		<dc:creator>Donny D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 13:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=45066#comment-124821</guid>
		<description>Timothy Kincaid wrote,
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;While I appreciate the invitation that you have extended to my wife, she will not be able to attend. She is a full-time mom with seven beautiful children and an eighth on the way.&lt;/i&gt;

In other words, “this is NOT a family dinner. My wife will not be there and I refuse to pretend that you and your sex partner are a real relationship.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Timothy, I think that&#039;s the essence what Brian Brown is communicating there.

There also seems to be an element of heterosexual gloating in there as well.  As well as an attempt at a hoaky excuse, since I&#039;m sure &quot;Mrs. Brown&quot; can get enough help with the kids to get away for an evening here and there.  Brian Brown also manages to make his wife sound badly overworked to everyone who isn&#039;t grossly sexist.

Also he might be acting like he&#039;s being gallant and protecting poor little wifey-pooh from facing the evil, vicious homos in their own den.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Timothy Kincaid wrote,</p>
<blockquote><p><i>While I appreciate the invitation that you have extended to my wife, she will not be able to attend. She is a full-time mom with seven beautiful children and an eighth on the way.</i></p>
<p>In other words, “this is NOT a family dinner. My wife will not be there and I refuse to pretend that you and your sex partner are a real relationship.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Timothy, I think that&#8217;s the essence what Brian Brown is communicating there.</p>
<p>There also seems to be an element of heterosexual gloating in there as well.  As well as an attempt at a hoaky excuse, since I&#8217;m sure &#8220;Mrs. Brown&#8221; can get enough help with the kids to get away for an evening here and there.  Brian Brown also manages to make his wife sound badly overworked to everyone who isn&#8217;t grossly sexist.</p>
<p>Also he might be acting like he&#8217;s being gallant and protecting poor little wifey-pooh from facing the evil, vicious homos in their own den.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathaniel</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/05/29/45066/comment-page-1#comment-124812</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 12:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=45066#comment-124812</guid>
		<description>I have to wonder if Brown isn&#039;t a little misogynistic; i.e. he thinks a woman&#039;s place is barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen. If he succeeds in banning marriage equality forever (which won&#039;t happen, but that is his goal), would he then go after the freedoms of women?

As to being a hypocrite, the whole thing to me smacks of someone who protests too much. &quot;See, I have 8 kids. That proves I am straight.&quot; There are so many layers to that comment, we could probably spend a life-time unravelling everything Brown tried to say (intentionally or otherwise) with it. I hope Savage rebuts with an invitation for the children to tag along, and an offer of a sitter during the debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to wonder if Brown isn&#8217;t a little misogynistic; i.e. he thinks a woman&#8217;s place is barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen. If he succeeds in banning marriage equality forever (which won&#8217;t happen, but that is his goal), would he then go after the freedoms of women?</p>
<p>As to being a hypocrite, the whole thing to me smacks of someone who protests too much. &#8220;See, I have 8 kids. That proves I am straight.&#8221; There are so many layers to that comment, we could probably spend a life-time unravelling everything Brown tried to say (intentionally or otherwise) with it. I hope Savage rebuts with an invitation for the children to tag along, and an offer of a sitter during the debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/05/29/45066/comment-page-1#comment-124753</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 21:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=45066#comment-124753</guid>
		<description>another poster already stated it but the truth is if brian brown were a black man with all those kids or a hispanic man with all those kids let me tell you the repubs would be all about his &quot;food stamps&quot; and &quot;welfare&quot; and having more kids so the government can pay for them. but he is white so its ok.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>another poster already stated it but the truth is if brian brown were a black man with all those kids or a hispanic man with all those kids let me tell you the repubs would be all about his &#8220;food stamps&#8221; and &#8220;welfare&#8221; and having more kids so the government can pay for them. but he is white so its ok.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reed</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/05/29/45066/comment-page-1#comment-124709</link>
		<dc:creator>Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 15:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=45066#comment-124709</guid>
		<description>Pregnant for the eighth time.  Ah, yes.  &quot;The breeder defense.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pregnant for the eighth time.  Ah, yes.  &#8220;The breeder defense.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chiMaxx</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/05/29/45066/comment-page-1#comment-124706</link>
		<dc:creator>chiMaxx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 15:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=45066#comment-124706</guid>
		<description>Jarred: I think that is how Brown is trying to maneuver it--to make the video about the issues and principles not the people, arguing that two against one would be unfair ganging up on him. I hope Dan doesn&#039;t fall for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jarred: I think that is how Brown is trying to maneuver it&#8211;to make the video about the issues and principles not the people, arguing that two against one would be unfair ganging up on him. I hope Dan doesn&#8217;t fall for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jarred</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/05/29/45066/comment-page-1#comment-124698</link>
		<dc:creator>Jarred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 14:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=45066#comment-124698</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Not bringing his wife, and thus keeping both spouses off camera...&lt;/i&gt;

Wait, &lt;i&gt;are&lt;/i&gt; both spouses going to be kept off camera.  Personally, I hope that Dan&#039;s husband is right there by Dan&#039;s side.  After all, the fact that Brian&#039;s spouse chose to decline the invitation does not mean that Dan&#039;s husband has to follow suit.

Personally, I think it would make quite the statement to show Dan&#039;s husband standing there supporting Dan while Brian finds himself having to stand alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Not bringing his wife, and thus keeping both spouses off camera&#8230;</i></p>
<p>Wait, <i>are</i> both spouses going to be kept off camera.  Personally, I hope that Dan&#8217;s husband is right there by Dan&#8217;s side.  After all, the fact that Brian&#8217;s spouse chose to decline the invitation does not mean that Dan&#8217;s husband has to follow suit.</p>
<p>Personally, I think it would make quite the statement to show Dan&#8217;s husband standing there supporting Dan while Brian finds himself having to stand alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/05/29/45066/comment-page-1#comment-124694</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 13:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=45066#comment-124694</guid>
		<description>On the menu, Crow and Humble Pie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the menu, Crow and Humble Pie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: homer</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/05/29/45066/comment-page-1#comment-124692</link>
		<dc:creator>homer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 11:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=45066#comment-124692</guid>
		<description>Brian Brown will make sure everyone knows that his wife had to stay at home because he didn&#039;t want to expose her to Dan Savage and Dan&#039;s husband. The NOM followers will eat this up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian Brown will make sure everyone knows that his wife had to stay at home because he didn&#8217;t want to expose her to Dan Savage and Dan&#8217;s husband. The NOM followers will eat this up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy (TRiG)</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/05/29/45066/comment-page-1#comment-124689</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy (TRiG)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 11:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=45066#comment-124689</guid>
		<description>This I did not expect. Could be interesting. (Could also be painful.)

TRiG.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This I did not expect. Could be interesting. (Could also be painful.)</p>
<p>TRiG.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/05/29/45066/comment-page-1#comment-124682</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 08:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=45066#comment-124682</guid>
		<description>Well, with seven kids and an eighth on the way, we cannot accuse Mr. Brown of being a hypocrite.  He really does believe marriage is about the children.  Apparently about the sex, too.

While I wish the entire family well, if this was a lower-income, working class, nonwhite traditional one man/one woman family, Republicans would be all over them for not being able to control themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, with seven kids and an eighth on the way, we cannot accuse Mr. Brown of being a hypocrite.  He really does believe marriage is about the children.  Apparently about the sex, too.</p>
<p>While I wish the entire family well, if this was a lower-income, working class, nonwhite traditional one man/one woman family, Republicans would be all over them for not being able to control themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
