<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Those darn activist (Republican appointed) judges</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/05/31/45149/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/05/31/45149</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 14:07:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/05/31/45149/comment-page-1#comment-125164</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 17:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=45149#comment-125164</guid>
		<description>I do find it amusing...and heartening...that it has been Republican court appointees upholding marriage equality, in the best tradition of the GOP by the way.  HOWEVER, the big cahunas on the Supreme Court, Scalia, Thomas, Alito, maybe even Roberts.  I can&#039;t see them doing the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do find it amusing&#8230;and heartening&#8230;that it has been Republican court appointees upholding marriage equality, in the best tradition of the GOP by the way.  HOWEVER, the big cahunas on the Supreme Court, Scalia, Thomas, Alito, maybe even Roberts.  I can&#8217;t see them doing the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Kincaid</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/05/31/45149/comment-page-1#comment-124878</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Kincaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 23:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=45149#comment-124878</guid>
		<description>I underestimated Brian Brown&#039;s commitment to dishonesty:

&lt;i&gt;&quot;Liberal federal judges in Massachusetts and California have resorted to making up legal standards in order to justify redefining marriage,&quot; said Brian Brown, NOM&#039;s president.&lt;/i&gt;

Those liberal federal judges in California would be Chief Judge Walker Vaughn of the San Francisco US District Court and his replacement Judge James Ware, both Republicans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I underestimated Brian Brown&#8217;s commitment to dishonesty:</p>
<p><i>&#8220;Liberal federal judges in Massachusetts and California have resorted to making up legal standards in order to justify redefining marriage,&#8221; said Brian Brown, NOM&#8217;s president.</i></p>
<p>Those liberal federal judges in California would be Chief Judge Walker Vaughn of the San Francisco US District Court and his replacement Judge James Ware, both Republicans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StraightGrandmother</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/05/31/45149/comment-page-1#comment-124873</link>
		<dc:creator>StraightGrandmother</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 23:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=45149#comment-124873</guid>
		<description>Well at least they had the Republican good graces to &quot;be sorry&quot; about it, here is what they said int their ruling,

&quot;Invalidating a federal statute is an unwelcome responsibility for federal judges; the elected Congress speaks for the entire nation, its judgment and good faith being entitled to utmost respect. Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153, 175 (1976) (plurality opinion). But a lower federal court such as ours must follow its best understanding of governing precedent, knowing that in large matters the Supreme Court will correct mis-readings (and even if it approves the result will formulate its own explanation).&quot;

That should cover them with their Republican friends....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well at least they had the Republican good graces to &#8220;be sorry&#8221; about it, here is what they said int their ruling,</p>
<p>&#8220;Invalidating a federal statute is an unwelcome responsibility for federal judges; the elected Congress speaks for the entire nation, its judgment and good faith being entitled to utmost respect. Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153, 175 (1976) (plurality opinion). But a lower federal court such as ours must follow its best understanding of governing precedent, knowing that in large matters the Supreme Court will correct mis-readings (and even if it approves the result will formulate its own explanation).&#8221;</p>
<p>That should cover them with their Republican friends&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StraightGrandmother</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/05/31/45149/comment-page-1#comment-124872</link>
		<dc:creator>StraightGrandmother</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 23:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=45149#comment-124872</guid>
		<description>JFE- Would that be a No True Scotsman?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JFE- Would that be a No True Scotsman?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jerry</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/05/31/45149/comment-page-1#comment-124868</link>
		<dc:creator>jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 22:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=45149#comment-124868</guid>
		<description>Obviously that radical feminist appointed by Clinton if responsible for this.  She managed to horns-waggle those two poor old Repugnican appointed men into voting the wrong way.  

A real she-devil that one.  

Oh, yeah.  Glad to see you back Timothy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously that radical feminist appointed by Clinton if responsible for this.  She managed to horns-waggle those two poor old Repugnican appointed men into voting the wrong way.  </p>
<p>A real she-devil that one.  </p>
<p>Oh, yeah.  Glad to see you back Timothy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JFE</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/05/31/45149/comment-page-1#comment-124850</link>
		<dc:creator>JFE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 18:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=45149#comment-124850</guid>
		<description>Yeah, but George H.W. Bush and Gerald Ford weren&#039;t REAL Republicans....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, but George H.W. Bush and Gerald Ford weren&#8217;t REAL Republicans&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Truthspew</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/05/31/45149/comment-page-1#comment-124848</link>
		<dc:creator>Truthspew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 18:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=45149#comment-124848</guid>
		<description>Justice is a funny thing. When you break it down to legal argument the bigots have no substantial reason to support inequality. 

In essence fact matters, belief does not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justice is a funny thing. When you break it down to legal argument the bigots have no substantial reason to support inequality. </p>
<p>In essence fact matters, belief does not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
