<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Federal Government already does recognize your marriage in Los Angeles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/06/07/45397/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/06/07/45397</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 14:07:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PJB863</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/06/07/45397/comment-page-1#comment-125574</link>
		<dc:creator>PJB863</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 05:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=45397#comment-125574</guid>
		<description>This sounds like we have all the responsibilities but none of the rights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds like we have all the responsibilities but none of the rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/06/07/45397/comment-page-1#comment-125553</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 01:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=45397#comment-125553</guid>
		<description>That depends on if it&#039;s a facial or as-applied challenge. If it&#039;s the latter, it only applies to them. Same with the Golinski case. The court ordered that she should receive benefits for her wife. But it doesn&#039;t apply to anyone else</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That depends on if it&#8217;s a facial or as-applied challenge. If it&#8217;s the latter, it only applies to them. Same with the Golinski case. The court ordered that she should receive benefits for her wife. But it doesn&#8217;t apply to anyone else</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
