<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yep, marriage is a certainty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/06/15/45768/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/06/15/45768</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 01:09:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrewdb</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/06/15/45768/comment-page-1#comment-126545</link>
		<dc:creator>andrewdb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 18:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/06/15/45768#comment-126545</guid>
		<description>I think the timing was very related to fundraising issues.

It has been widely reported the Wall Street donations to the Presdient have dried up this year (OWS and the administration&#039;s reaction hasn&#039;t pleased Wall Street donors).  This means the LGBT community is, relatively, more important to his campaign.

It has also been reported (Politico had a piece awhile back - I can&#039;t find the link) that major donors, in some case 7 figures, to the President&#039;s super PAC almost completely shut down after the White House meeting on why they wouldn&#039;t be issuing an ENDA executive order for Federal contractors.  A couple of weeks after that the President &quot;evolved&quot; on marriage.

I used to think that one didn&#039;t want to upset folks from Chicago - they would get even.  I&#039;ve done a 180 and now think the only thing that gets their attention is bare knuckle politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the timing was very related to fundraising issues.</p>
<p>It has been widely reported the Wall Street donations to the Presdient have dried up this year (OWS and the administration&#8217;s reaction hasn&#8217;t pleased Wall Street donors).  This means the LGBT community is, relatively, more important to his campaign.</p>
<p>It has also been reported (Politico had a piece awhile back &#8211; I can&#8217;t find the link) that major donors, in some case 7 figures, to the President&#8217;s super PAC almost completely shut down after the White House meeting on why they wouldn&#8217;t be issuing an ENDA executive order for Federal contractors.  A couple of weeks after that the President &#8220;evolved&#8221; on marriage.</p>
<p>I used to think that one didn&#8217;t want to upset folks from Chicago &#8211; they would get even.  I&#8217;ve done a 180 and now think the only thing that gets their attention is bare knuckle politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark F.</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/06/15/45768/comment-page-1#comment-126535</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 16:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/06/15/45768#comment-126535</guid>
		<description>Well, I&#039;m inclined to believe the timing was all political calculation  (I don&#039;t believe Obama walks on water), but maybe not for the reasons Limbaugh thinks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;m inclined to believe the timing was all political calculation  (I don&#8217;t believe Obama walks on water), but maybe not for the reasons Limbaugh thinks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gus</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/06/15/45768/comment-page-1#comment-126499</link>
		<dc:creator>Gus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 11:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/06/15/45768#comment-126499</guid>
		<description>&quot;hold off endorsing marriage equality until closer to the election so it could be part of a media point but that rich donors forced his hand.&quot;

That makes no sense in today&#039;s super pac world. All the TV ad time will have been bought already by the billionaire Republicans. Getting money from rich friends in September/October for ads is too late.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;hold off endorsing marriage equality until closer to the election so it could be part of a media point but that rich donors forced his hand.&#8221;</p>
<p>That makes no sense in today&#8217;s super pac world. All the TV ad time will have been bought already by the billionaire Republicans. Getting money from rich friends in September/October for ads is too late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
