<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You know that you’ve lost the “protect marriage” battle, when…</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/07/06/46305/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/07/06/46305</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 01:08:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reed Boyer</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/07/06/46305/comment-page-1#comment-130472</link>
		<dc:creator>Reed Boyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2012 21:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=46305#comment-130472</guid>
		<description>&quot;everyone knows that it will pass in two years&quot; . . . ?

Unless further PC-USA churches split out.  

But this is an internal religious polity matter - and the national body hasn&#039;t taken any pro-gay marriage stance regarding the civil statutes (nor should it).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;everyone knows that it will pass in two years&#8221; . . . ?</p>
<p>Unless further PC-USA churches split out.  </p>
<p>But this is an internal religious polity matter &#8211; and the national body hasn&#8217;t taken any pro-gay marriage stance regarding the civil statutes (nor should it).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
