<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Long lines and pickets at Hollywood Chick-Fil-A</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/08/01/47255/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/08/01/47255</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 18:17:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: occono</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/08/01/47255/comment-page-1#comment-135488</link>
		<dc:creator>occono</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 01:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=47255#comment-135488</guid>
		<description>^ Yes. The CFA Day wasn&#039;t proposed over the Mayors. And the LGBT community&#039;s boycott was not calling for it (at least not in any significant number), but I&#039;ve seen people either believing or pretending like it was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^ Yes. The CFA Day wasn&#8217;t proposed over the Mayors. And the LGBT community&#8217;s boycott was not calling for it (at least not in any significant number), but I&#8217;ve seen people either believing or pretending like it was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/08/01/47255/comment-page-1#comment-135313</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2012 11:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=47255#comment-135313</guid>
		<description>Reed, Huckabee announced &quot;Chick-Fl-A Appreciation Day&quot; on July 24th. At that point,  the mayor of Boston was the only Mayor who had threatened free speech by exercising his own. I find it baffling that anyone would attempt to pretend that the other day was about anything other than antipathy to gay people. But the internet is a strange place. I guess if my own siblings had gone,  I would struggle to find a way to justify it, too. Now, the dumb grandstanding mayors did for the first time actually give the anti-gays an actual good argument. You can&#039;t ban a restaurant based on the owner&#039;s political views. They overstepped. But Huckabee&#039;s day wasn&#039;t about that. His stated reason was &quot;the hate speech and intolerant  bigotry towards Chick-Fil-A&quot;. It would&#039;ve happened if the mayors had said nothing and everyone who went still would&#039;ve gone, and those uncomfortable with being seen as anti-gay still would&#039;ve mumbled platitudes about freedom of speech. I know this because this is hardly the first time something like this has happened. The &quot;freedom of speech&quot; thing gets hauled out every single time their speech is criticized.  It&#039;s as predictable as &quot;if you&#039;re so tolerant, why don&#039;t you tolerate my intolerance&quot;? As for &quot;SSM&quot;, I&#039;ve never seen it anywhere but on anti-equality blogs. I&#039;ve seen &quot;same sex marriage&quot; written out, but not the abbreviated &quot;SSM&quot; or &quot;SSA&quot; which I always theorized was because writing out an acronym would not force them to write the word &quot;sex&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reed, Huckabee announced &#8220;Chick-Fl-A Appreciation Day&#8221; on July 24th. At that point,  the mayor of Boston was the only Mayor who had threatened free speech by exercising his own. I find it baffling that anyone would attempt to pretend that the other day was about anything other than antipathy to gay people. But the internet is a strange place. I guess if my own siblings had gone,  I would struggle to find a way to justify it, too. Now, the dumb grandstanding mayors did for the first time actually give the anti-gays an actual good argument. You can&#8217;t ban a restaurant based on the owner&#8217;s political views. They overstepped. But Huckabee&#8217;s day wasn&#8217;t about that. His stated reason was &#8220;the hate speech and intolerant  bigotry towards Chick-Fil-A&#8221;. It would&#8217;ve happened if the mayors had said nothing and everyone who went still would&#8217;ve gone, and those uncomfortable with being seen as anti-gay still would&#8217;ve mumbled platitudes about freedom of speech. I know this because this is hardly the first time something like this has happened. The &#8220;freedom of speech&#8221; thing gets hauled out every single time their speech is criticized.  It&#8217;s as predictable as &#8220;if you&#8217;re so tolerant, why don&#8217;t you tolerate my intolerance&#8221;? As for &#8220;SSM&#8221;, I&#8217;ve never seen it anywhere but on anti-equality blogs. I&#8217;ve seen &#8220;same sex marriage&#8221; written out, but not the abbreviated &#8220;SSM&#8221; or &#8220;SSA&#8221; which I always theorized was because writing out an acronym would not force them to write the word &#8220;sex&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnAGJ</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/08/01/47255/comment-page-1#comment-135236</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnAGJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 19:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=47255#comment-135236</guid>
		<description>Reed:  Beats me, I tend to ignore the Huckster.  It wouldn&#039;t surprise me given the man&#039;s record on gay rights issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reed:  Beats me, I tend to ignore the Huckster.  It wouldn&#8217;t surprise me given the man&#8217;s record on gay rights issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnAGJ</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/08/01/47255/comment-page-1#comment-135235</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnAGJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 19:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=47255#comment-135235</guid>
		<description>Ryan:  Well 2 of them are much older than I am so given the age difference perhaps you could make an issue out of it, but even so I think I happen to know my own brother and sister far better than most folks in this world.  As for &quot;SSM&quot;, I&#039;ve seen this used as a shorthand for &quot;same-sex marriage&quot; on any number of gay blogs for a few years now.  Since when did it suddenly become verboten?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan:  Well 2 of them are much older than I am so given the age difference perhaps you could make an issue out of it, but even so I think I happen to know my own brother and sister far better than most folks in this world.  As for &#8220;SSM&#8221;, I&#8217;ve seen this used as a shorthand for &#8220;same-sex marriage&#8221; on any number of gay blogs for a few years now.  Since when did it suddenly become verboten?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Kincaid</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/08/01/47255/comment-page-1#comment-135218</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Kincaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 17:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=47255#comment-135218</guid>
		<description>While I try to not set a rule for myself but use the term that is the most accurate, my personal preference is &quot;equality&quot;.  That&#039;s the issue to me, not &quot;marriage equality&quot;, which (to me) suggests that some areas of equality are up for greater debate than others.

But when the context calls for it, I&#039;ll use &quot;same-sex marriage&quot; (if, for example, a law bans marriage between people of the same sex) or &quot;gay marriage&quot; (if talking about what gets conservatives&#039; undies in a bunch).

I think it&#039;s wiser than coming up with a rule to stick by (I&#039;m not a big fan of strict rules, be they Biblical or politically correct).

Perhaps the funniest example of PC nonsense was when I was chatting with a friend about the movie Beautiful Thing.  He was saying how impressed he was with &quot;the African American girl&quot; who sang Mama Cass songs.  The movie is set in Britain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I try to not set a rule for myself but use the term that is the most accurate, my personal preference is &#8220;equality&#8221;.  That&#8217;s the issue to me, not &#8220;marriage equality&#8221;, which (to me) suggests that some areas of equality are up for greater debate than others.</p>
<p>But when the context calls for it, I&#8217;ll use &#8220;same-sex marriage&#8221; (if, for example, a law bans marriage between people of the same sex) or &#8220;gay marriage&#8221; (if talking about what gets conservatives&#8217; undies in a bunch).</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s wiser than coming up with a rule to stick by (I&#8217;m not a big fan of strict rules, be they Biblical or politically correct).</p>
<p>Perhaps the funniest example of PC nonsense was when I was chatting with a friend about the movie Beautiful Thing.  He was saying how impressed he was with &#8220;the African American girl&#8221; who sang Mama Cass songs.  The movie is set in Britain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Priya Lynn</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/08/01/47255/comment-page-1#comment-135217</link>
		<dc:creator>Priya Lynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 16:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=47255#comment-135217</guid>
		<description>Reed said &quot;“SSM?” I don’t use it, myself. “Marrige equality” seems to be “the term.” Because “same-SEX marriage” just plays into the “it’s all about sex with those queers and those breeders game.”&quot;.

I sometimes use the term myself but in light of the issue Reed has raised I suggest those of us who sometimes use that term because we feel it is more explicit than &quot;marriage equality&quot; us the term &quot;same gender marriage&quot; instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reed said &#8220;“SSM?” I don’t use it, myself. “Marrige equality” seems to be “the term.” Because “same-SEX marriage” just plays into the “it’s all about sex with those queers and those breeders game.”&#8221;.</p>
<p>I sometimes use the term myself but in light of the issue Reed has raised I suggest those of us who sometimes use that term because we feel it is more explicit than &#8220;marriage equality&#8221; us the term &#8220;same gender marriage&#8221; instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reed</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/08/01/47255/comment-page-1#comment-135195</link>
		<dc:creator>Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 13:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=47255#comment-135195</guid>
		<description>JohnAGJ - maybe my time line is wrong, but didn&#039;t Huckabee announce this &quot;Appreciation Day&quot; BEFORE &quot;those bad wicked big city mayors done tried to stomp all over the little people&#039;s religious freedom?&quot;

&quot;SSM?&quot;  I don&#039;t use it, myself.  &quot;Marrige equality&quot; seems to be &quot;the term.&quot;  Because &quot;same-SEX marriage&quot; just plays into the &quot;it&#039;s all about sex with those queers and those breeders game.&quot;  

In any case, it has much the same quaint, inaccurate quality as &quot;sexual preference.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JohnAGJ &#8211; maybe my time line is wrong, but didn&#8217;t Huckabee announce this &#8220;Appreciation Day&#8221; BEFORE &#8220;those bad wicked big city mayors done tried to stomp all over the little people&#8217;s religious freedom?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;SSM?&#8221;  I don&#8217;t use it, myself.  &#8220;Marrige equality&#8221; seems to be &#8220;the term.&#8221;  Because &#8220;same-SEX marriage&#8221; just plays into the &#8220;it&#8217;s all about sex with those queers and those breeders game.&#8221;  </p>
<p>In any case, it has much the same quaint, inaccurate quality as &#8220;sexual preference.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Burroway</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/08/01/47255/comment-page-1#comment-135136</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Burroway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 04:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=47255#comment-135136</guid>
		<description>Ryan,

A lot of people write SSM as shorthand for same-sex marriage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan,</p>
<p>A lot of people write SSM as shorthand for same-sex marriage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/08/01/47255/comment-page-1#comment-135127</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 02:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=47255#comment-135127</guid>
		<description>Sorry John, no you don&#039;t.  And you gave yourself away with the NOM approved terminology &quot;SSM&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry John, no you don&#8217;t.  And you gave yourself away with the NOM approved terminology &#8220;SSM&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: occono</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/08/01/47255/comment-page-1#comment-135106</link>
		<dc:creator>occono</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 00:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=47255#comment-135106</guid>
		<description>I think the mayors may have had some rationale: Chick-Fil-A has been sued for employment discrimination and has policies that will likely conflict with the employment laws of the states. But these lawsuits are pending, and the politicians statements weren&#039;t focused on it, so their statements became completely about the reaction to Cathy&#039;s interview, as far as I can tell. But I&#039;m really not bothered to defend them.

But the idea that the best thing to do to is to go to CFA to retaliate against those politicians......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the mayors may have had some rationale: Chick-Fil-A has been sued for employment discrimination and has policies that will likely conflict with the employment laws of the states. But these lawsuits are pending, and the politicians statements weren&#8217;t focused on it, so their statements became completely about the reaction to Cathy&#8217;s interview, as far as I can tell. But I&#8217;m really not bothered to defend them.</p>
<p>But the idea that the best thing to do to is to go to CFA to retaliate against those politicians&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
