<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Email of the Day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/08/23/48017/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/08/23/48017</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 18:50:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DN</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/08/23/48017/comment-page-1#comment-137492</link>
		<dc:creator>DN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 10:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=48017#comment-137492</guid>
		<description>*sigh*

Catholic Charities was *not* forced out of business in Massachusetts.

First of all, they had already been adopting kids to gay couples before gay marriage:

http://articles.latimes.com/2008/nov/02/opinion/ed-prop8-2

Second, Catholic Charities voluntarily shuttered itself rather than comply with the law.

Third, &quot;complying with the law&quot; meant that if they wanted to follow their anti-gay doctrine (which I fully support their right to do), they could - they just had no recourse to state funds.  Other religious adoption agencies (Mormons spring to mind) continue to run adoption agencies in the state.

I&#039;m *so* tired of this paper-thin lie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*sigh*</p>
<p>Catholic Charities was *not* forced out of business in Massachusetts.</p>
<p>First of all, they had already been adopting kids to gay couples before gay marriage:</p>
<p><a href="http://articles.latimes.com/2008/nov/02/opinion/ed-prop8-2" rel="nofollow">http://articles.latimes.com/2008/nov/02/opinion/ed-prop8-2</a></p>
<p>Second, Catholic Charities voluntarily shuttered itself rather than comply with the law.</p>
<p>Third, &#8220;complying with the law&#8221; meant that if they wanted to follow their anti-gay doctrine (which I fully support their right to do), they could &#8211; they just had no recourse to state funds.  Other religious adoption agencies (Mormons spring to mind) continue to run adoption agencies in the state.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m *so* tired of this paper-thin lie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/08/23/48017/comment-page-1#comment-137473</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 05:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=48017#comment-137473</guid>
		<description>Brian likes to complain about the word marriage being redefined. It seems he has no problem redefining the word bully.

A bully is &quot;a blustering, quarrelsome, overbearing person who habitually badgers and intimidates smaller or weaker people.&quot; 

Brown&#039;s definition completely inverts the meaning. LGBT activism lobbies to overcome the legacy of bullying from an inherited inequality dating back to a time of criminalisation. This is the context of fighting back.

When Brown calls &quot;to fight back and fight harder&quot; he&#039;s actually calling to double down on the beating before the victim gets away. He wants to change the definition of the word bully to mean the person who wont take their beating and stay down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian likes to complain about the word marriage being redefined. It seems he has no problem redefining the word bully.</p>
<p>A bully is &#8220;a blustering, quarrelsome, overbearing person who habitually badgers and intimidates smaller or weaker people.&#8221; </p>
<p>Brown&#8217;s definition completely inverts the meaning. LGBT activism lobbies to overcome the legacy of bullying from an inherited inequality dating back to a time of criminalisation. This is the context of fighting back.</p>
<p>When Brown calls &#8220;to fight back and fight harder&#8221; he&#8217;s actually calling to double down on the beating before the victim gets away. He wants to change the definition of the word bully to mean the person who wont take their beating and stay down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory Peterson</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/08/23/48017/comment-page-1#comment-137468</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 03:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=48017#comment-137468</guid>
		<description>&quot;We don&#039;t consider ourselves hate-mongers and racists and bigots.&quot;

Robert Patterson, a founder and the   Mississippi Executive Secretary of the (white) Citizens&#039; Councils.

From the book: The Deep South Says Never
by John Bartlow Martin. Ballantine Books, New York. 1957. page 3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We don&#8217;t consider ourselves hate-mongers and racists and bigots.&#8221;</p>
<p>Robert Patterson, a founder and the   Mississippi Executive Secretary of the (white) Citizens&#8217; Councils.</p>
<p>From the book: The Deep South Says Never<br />
by John Bartlow Martin. Ballantine Books, New York. 1957. page 3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cowboy</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/08/23/48017/comment-page-1#comment-137436</link>
		<dc:creator>cowboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 21:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=48017#comment-137436</guid>
		<description>Mr. Kincaid,

I think the date is September 22, 2011.  

It&#039;s when Ms. Gallagher left the sinking ship.  

http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/09/22/37304

Since then, it&#039;s been one bad episode after another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Kincaid,</p>
<p>I think the date is September 22, 2011.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s when Ms. Gallagher left the sinking ship.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/09/22/37304" rel="nofollow" class="articleLink">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2011/09/22/37304</a></p>
<p>Since then, it&#8217;s been one bad episode after another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/08/23/48017/comment-page-1#comment-137428</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 19:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=48017#comment-137428</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;ve got $50, $100, or as much as you can give right now to sustain the fight, send it to the American Foundation for Equal Rights (working on the Prop 8 case in the federal courts) or the groups in Washington, Minnesota, Maine, or Maryland working on marriage equality ballot items in this year&#039;s election.  We really need a ballot box victory on this question soon.  And if SCOTUS takes the Prop 8 case, we&#039;ll need to win there, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;ve got $50, $100, or as much as you can give right now to sustain the fight, send it to the American Foundation for Equal Rights (working on the Prop 8 case in the federal courts) or the groups in Washington, Minnesota, Maine, or Maryland working on marriage equality ballot items in this year&#8217;s election.  We really need a ballot box victory on this question soon.  And if SCOTUS takes the Prop 8 case, we&#8217;ll need to win there, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soren456</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/08/23/48017/comment-page-1#comment-137404</link>
		<dc:creator>Soren456</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 16:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=48017#comment-137404</guid>
		<description>As Gore Vidal noted, the squalor never ends among persons to whom truth is no criterion. 

Eugene has always presented himself in a hyperbolic panic. As things tighten up moneywise for NOM, I guess they see the advantage in Eugene&#039;s approach.

MattNYC says it: Great minds think alike.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Gore Vidal noted, the squalor never ends among persons to whom truth is no criterion. </p>
<p>Eugene has always presented himself in a hyperbolic panic. As things tighten up moneywise for NOM, I guess they see the advantage in Eugene&#8217;s approach.</p>
<p>MattNYC says it: Great minds think alike.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Kincaid</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/08/23/48017/comment-page-1#comment-137403</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Kincaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 16:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=48017#comment-137403</guid>
		<description>September 20, 1977

That was the day that an episode of Happy Days ran in which Fonzie jumped over a shark.  On water skis.  Wearing a swimsuit and leather jacket.

I wonder just what day will be noted as the day that NOM jumped the shark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>September 20, 1977</p>
<p>That was the day that an episode of Happy Days ran in which Fonzie jumped over a shark.  On water skis.  Wearing a swimsuit and leather jacket.</p>
<p>I wonder just what day will be noted as the day that NOM jumped the shark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael C</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/08/23/48017/comment-page-1#comment-137398</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 16:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=48017#comment-137398</guid>
		<description>Whether or not gay couples are allowed to marry, children WILL be taught that some people are gay and there is nothing wrong with that.

Whether or not gay couples are allowed to marry, organizations and businesses WILL Not be allowed to discriminate against gay people.

Whether or not gay couples are allowed to marry, Americans who do not respect gay people WILL continue to be allowed their personal opinions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether or not gay couples are allowed to marry, children WILL be taught that some people are gay and there is nothing wrong with that.</p>
<p>Whether or not gay couples are allowed to marry, organizations and businesses WILL Not be allowed to discriminate against gay people.</p>
<p>Whether or not gay couples are allowed to marry, Americans who do not respect gay people WILL continue to be allowed their personal opinions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David in Houston</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/08/23/48017/comment-page-1#comment-137388</link>
		<dc:creator>David in Houston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 15:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=48017#comment-137388</guid>
		<description>I have no problem with any of those so-called consequences. 

1. Young children ((might)) be taught that same-sex marriage is legal in their state. If that child happens to grow up to be gay, that information (that they have the same opportunity to get married, regardless of their sexual orientation) would be a very positive thing to hear. If the child is straight, it won&#039;t impact their life at all.

2. If that religious non-profit organization is taking taxpayer money they cannot discriminate against gay citizens... who ALSO pay taxes, which in effect supports those organizations.

3. The majority of Americans who support the historic understanding of &quot;same-race&quot; marriage (that existed 45 years ago) ARE currently treated as bigots and racists. But they are NOT condemned for their bigotry under the law. That makes Brian Brown a liar. Shocking, I know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no problem with any of those so-called consequences. </p>
<p>1. Young children ((might)) be taught that same-sex marriage is legal in their state. If that child happens to grow up to be gay, that information (that they have the same opportunity to get married, regardless of their sexual orientation) would be a very positive thing to hear. If the child is straight, it won&#8217;t impact their life at all.</p>
<p>2. If that religious non-profit organization is taking taxpayer money they cannot discriminate against gay citizens&#8230; who ALSO pay taxes, which in effect supports those organizations.</p>
<p>3. The majority of Americans who support the historic understanding of &#8220;same-race&#8221; marriage (that existed 45 years ago) ARE currently treated as bigots and racists. But they are NOT condemned for their bigotry under the law. That makes Brian Brown a liar. Shocking, I know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MattNYC</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/08/23/48017/comment-page-1#comment-137380</link>
		<dc:creator>MattNYC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 15:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=48017#comment-137380</guid>
		<description>&quot;Great&quot; minds think alike, eh?  Wonder if there&#039;s a daily fax from Hate Central that they can use for language like the RNC/Faux News.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Great&#8221; minds think alike, eh?  Wonder if there&#8217;s a daily fax from Hate Central that they can use for language like the RNC/Faux News.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
