<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: David Koch endorses marriage equality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/09/01/48286/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/09/01/48286</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:19:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Roberts</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/09/01/48286/comment-page-1#comment-138528</link>
		<dc:creator>David Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2012 18:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=48286#comment-138528</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
	
		So pro-equality Democrats who supported Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton and Obama (in 2008) were hypocrites? Glad to clear that up.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

	If during those elections there were viable pro-gay candidates who were working for marriage equality and could have been chosen as an alternative, then you bet.

	David Koch spends millions and millions of dollars on the most extreme, anti-gay candidates in the party known for the most anti-gay platform.&#160; Can you really not figure out the difference?

	Hope I have &quot;cleared that up&quot; for you.&#160;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p>		So pro-equality Democrats who supported Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton and Obama (in 2008) were hypocrites? Glad to clear that up.
</p></blockquote>
<p>	If during those elections there were viable pro-gay candidates who were working for marriage equality and could have been chosen as an alternative, then you bet.</p>
<p>	David Koch spends millions and millions of dollars on the most extreme, anti-gay candidates in the party known for the most anti-gay platform.&nbsp; Can you really not figure out the difference?</p>
<p>	Hope I have &#8220;cleared that up&#8221; for you.&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark F.</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/09/01/48286/comment-page-1#comment-138527</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2012 18:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=48286#comment-138527</guid>
		<description>&quot;Exactly. As long as his money goes to fund those who are against marriage equality, these personal views only serve to make him a hypocrite.&quot;

So pro-equality Democrats who supported Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton and Obama (in 2008) were hypocrites? Glad to clear that up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Exactly. As long as his money goes to fund those who are against marriage equality, these personal views only serve to make him a hypocrite.&#8221;</p>
<p>So pro-equality Democrats who supported Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton and Obama (in 2008) were hypocrites? Glad to clear that up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/09/01/48286/comment-page-1#comment-138517</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2012 15:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=48286#comment-138517</guid>
		<description>He may believe in gay marriage but does he care about gay people?  Probably not more than he cares about money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He may believe in gay marriage but does he care about gay people?  Probably not more than he cares about money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: customartist</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/09/01/48286/comment-page-1#comment-138514</link>
		<dc:creator>customartist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2012 15:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=48286#comment-138514</guid>
		<description>Money is also speech, so i would say that Mr. Koch speeks with forked-tongue [as all Republicans do right before elections]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Money is also speech, so i would say that Mr. Koch speeks with forked-tongue [as all Republicans do right before elections]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Waite</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/09/01/48286/comment-page-1#comment-138512</link>
		<dc:creator>David Waite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2012 13:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=48286#comment-138512</guid>
		<description>I call &quot;hypocrisy!&quot; on anyone who claims to be a &quot;friend&quot; of anyone whom they then label with a pejorative and totally phony, made-up political or sexual curse-label. I would be more blunt than merely charging hypocrisy face to face, but BTB is a place which accomodates civil discourse and disagreement; a scarce internet value which I treasure.

&quot;Extreme liberal&quot; is a pejorative label. It was deliberately created as a pejorative label to offend liberals, by denying (as it does) liberals&#039; claims to reject all extremes. An extreme anything is by definition illiberal. Calling someone an extreme liberal is as intentionally offensive as using the terms &quot;wingnut&quot; and &quot;moonbat.&quot; Only two kinds of people use the term &quot;extreme liberal.&quot; They are either trying to insult or are ignorant of the oxymoronic nature of their labelling.

On David Koch&#039;s &quot;stating his position&quot; &lt;strong&gt;Ben in Oakland, Ryan, Lord Byron&lt;/strong&gt; and &lt;strong&gt;Hunter&lt;/strong&gt; all have it exactly correct. Koch &lt;strong&gt;says&lt;/strong&gt; he supports equality, but &lt;strong&gt;Koch&#039;s MONEY&lt;/strong&gt; supports bigotry because David Koch is a lying manipulator who hopes to fool ignorant people who don&#039;t examine his actual record.

Koch also knows his lie on this issue can be and is used by both the ignorant and the manipulative to outrage and divide their &quot;friends.&quot; It isn&#039;t a new tactic, and it wasn&#039;t invented by David Koch; the Romans codified it with &quot;divide and conquer.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I call &#8220;hypocrisy!&#8221; on anyone who claims to be a &#8220;friend&#8221; of anyone whom they then label with a pejorative and totally phony, made-up political or sexual curse-label. I would be more blunt than merely charging hypocrisy face to face, but BTB is a place which accomodates civil discourse and disagreement; a scarce internet value which I treasure.</p>
<p>&#8220;Extreme liberal&#8221; is a pejorative label. It was deliberately created as a pejorative label to offend liberals, by denying (as it does) liberals&#8217; claims to reject all extremes. An extreme anything is by definition illiberal. Calling someone an extreme liberal is as intentionally offensive as using the terms &#8220;wingnut&#8221; and &#8220;moonbat.&#8221; Only two kinds of people use the term &#8220;extreme liberal.&#8221; They are either trying to insult or are ignorant of the oxymoronic nature of their labelling.</p>
<p>On David Koch&#8217;s &#8220;stating his position&#8221; <strong>Ben in Oakland, Ryan, Lord Byron</strong> and <strong>Hunter</strong> all have it exactly correct. Koch <strong>says</strong> he supports equality, but <strong>Koch&#8217;s MONEY</strong> supports bigotry because David Koch is a lying manipulator who hopes to fool ignorant people who don&#8217;t examine his actual record.</p>
<p>Koch also knows his lie on this issue can be and is used by both the ignorant and the manipulative to outrage and divide their &#8220;friends.&#8221; It isn&#8217;t a new tactic, and it wasn&#8217;t invented by David Koch; the Romans codified it with &#8220;divide and conquer.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Belar</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/09/01/48286/comment-page-1#comment-138511</link>
		<dc:creator>Belar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2012 13:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=48286#comment-138511</guid>
		<description>Timothy, I agree that politicians listen when billionaires speak, but only when said billionaires threaten to withhold money from their reelection coffers.  I sincerely doubt that either of the Koch brothers will ever abandon the Republican party over their anti-gay views.  

If you take a look at what happened in New York, where wealthy businessmen DID threaten to withhold money if the Republicans that they backed didn&#039;t pass same-sexed marriage, they did stop, listen, and ultimately (at least a few) voted to approve it.  That&#039;s not a scenario that&#039;s likely to ever happen with David Koch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Timothy, I agree that politicians listen when billionaires speak, but only when said billionaires threaten to withhold money from their reelection coffers.  I sincerely doubt that either of the Koch brothers will ever abandon the Republican party over their anti-gay views.  </p>
<p>If you take a look at what happened in New York, where wealthy businessmen DID threaten to withhold money if the Republicans that they backed didn&#8217;t pass same-sexed marriage, they did stop, listen, and ultimately (at least a few) voted to approve it.  That&#8217;s not a scenario that&#8217;s likely to ever happen with David Koch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/09/01/48286/comment-page-1#comment-138510</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2012 13:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=48286#comment-138510</guid>
		<description>if he really cared, he&#039;d have his unwitting followers believe that embracing same-sex marriage would save the universe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if he really cared, he&#8217;d have his unwitting followers believe that embracing same-sex marriage would save the universe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hunter</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/09/01/48286/comment-page-1#comment-138506</link>
		<dc:creator>Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2012 10:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=48286#comment-138506</guid>
		<description>David Koch&#039;s support for same-sex marriage isn&#039;t going to translate into any real support.  His money will go to elect politicians who will do as they&#039;re told and taxes and subsidies for business -- that is, make more money for him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Koch&#8217;s support for same-sex marriage isn&#8217;t going to translate into any real support.  His money will go to elect politicians who will do as they&#8217;re told and taxes and subsidies for business &#8212; that is, make more money for him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Roberts</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/09/01/48286/comment-page-1#comment-138505</link>
		<dc:creator>David Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2012 10:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=48286#comment-138505</guid>
		<description>&quot;It only matters only if he is willing to withhold money from those who attack us&quot;

Exactly.  As long as his money goes to fund those who are against marriage equality, these personal views only serve to make him a hypocrite. 

Libertarianism is most often expressed in government through the right, i.e. GOP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It only matters only if he is willing to withhold money from those who attack us&#8221;</p>
<p>Exactly.  As long as his money goes to fund those who are against marriage equality, these personal views only serve to make him a hypocrite. </p>
<p>Libertarianism is most often expressed in government through the right, i.e. GOP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord_Byron</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/09/01/48286/comment-page-1#comment-138488</link>
		<dc:creator>Lord_Byron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2012 02:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=48286#comment-138488</guid>
		<description>By the people he gives money to it doesn&#039;t seem to matter that much to him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the people he gives money to it doesn&#8217;t seem to matter that much to him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
