<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GOP Senators Try Again to Curb Religious Freedoms on Military Bases</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/09/13/48643/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/09/13/48643</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 18:14:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reed</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/09/13/48643/comment-page-1#comment-142582</link>
		<dc:creator>Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 21:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=48643#comment-142582</guid>
		<description>Hue-man, &quot;vindicative&quot; is a wonderful new word, combining &quot;vindictive&quot; and &quot;indicative,&quot; isn&#039;t it?  Thanks for that.  Now, I&#039;ll use it in a sentence:  &quot;Hue-man&#039;s use of &#039;bibble&#039; instead of &#039;Bible&#039; wasn&#039;t an accident, it was vindicative of his anti-theism trumping his attention to orthography.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hue-man, &#8220;vindicative&#8221; is a wonderful new word, combining &#8220;vindictive&#8221; and &#8220;indicative,&#8221; isn&#8217;t it?  Thanks for that.  Now, I&#8217;ll use it in a sentence:  &#8220;Hue-man&#8217;s use of &#8216;bibble&#8217; instead of &#8216;Bible&#8217; wasn&#8217;t an accident, it was vindicative of his anti-theism trumping his attention to orthography.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnAGJ</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/09/13/48643/comment-page-1#comment-142562</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnAGJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 20:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=48643#comment-142562</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s the text of the bill in question:

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s3526/text

Sections 1 and 2 may pass constitutional muster, perhaps with some tweaking, but novice thought I am I cannot see how Section 3 possibly can.  This section would prohibit the free exercise of religion at the mentioned facilities, regardless of the legality of the marriage ceremonies that might taken place there.  Seems to me this would be struck down on clear First Amendment grounds regardless of whether same-sex marriage is deemed to be constitutionally protected or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the text of the bill in question:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s3526/text" rel="nofollow">http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s3526/text</a></p>
<p>Sections 1 and 2 may pass constitutional muster, perhaps with some tweaking, but novice thought I am I cannot see how Section 3 possibly can.  This section would prohibit the free exercise of religion at the mentioned facilities, regardless of the legality of the marriage ceremonies that might taken place there.  Seems to me this would be struck down on clear First Amendment grounds regardless of whether same-sex marriage is deemed to be constitutionally protected or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tristram</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/09/13/48643/comment-page-1#comment-142501</link>
		<dc:creator>tristram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 18:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=48643#comment-142501</guid>
		<description>The scary part is that these guys and others like them are the senior Republicans in the Senate. If the GOP gets a Senate majority in Nov. (which is a distinct possibility if Senate races in places like MA, OH and VA go their way), Mitch McConnell will be running the Senate and these types will be chairing the Senate committees, appointing the committee staffs, setting the agenda. Everything they want becomes exponentially easier to achieve; everything they oppose does not happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The scary part is that these guys and others like them are the senior Republicans in the Senate. If the GOP gets a Senate majority in Nov. (which is a distinct possibility if Senate races in places like MA, OH and VA go their way), Mitch McConnell will be running the Senate and these types will be chairing the Senate committees, appointing the committee staffs, setting the agenda. Everything they want becomes exponentially easier to achieve; everything they oppose does not happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MattNYC</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/09/13/48643/comment-page-1#comment-142490</link>
		<dc:creator>MattNYC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 18:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=48643#comment-142490</guid>
		<description>If there were a vote to repeal the laws of gravity, Inhofe would be a lead sponsor.  This is a man who claims that there has never been a homosexual in his entire family tree--probably not even that crazy life-long bachelor great uncle.

Demented (or perhaps &quot;DeMint-ed&quot;) is the only word that comes to mind when I hear either OK Senator speak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there were a vote to repeal the laws of gravity, Inhofe would be a lead sponsor.  This is a man who claims that there has never been a homosexual in his entire family tree&#8211;probably not even that crazy life-long bachelor great uncle.</p>
<p>Demented (or perhaps &#8220;DeMint-ed&#8221;) is the only word that comes to mind when I hear either OK Senator speak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Kincaid</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/09/13/48643/comment-page-1#comment-142482</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Kincaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 18:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=48643#comment-142482</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Supporters of the directive say chaplains are clearly exempt from same-sex services already, but some conservatives claim chaplains have been punished for refusing to perform same-sex ceremonies.
&lt;/i&gt;

We know of one chaplain who was harassed &lt;b&gt;by his denomination&lt;/b&gt; for attending a civil union ceremony (he quit the denomination and stayed a chaplain), but I&#039;ve heard from ZERO chaplains who have &quot;been punished for refusing to perform same-sex ceremonies.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Supporters of the directive say chaplains are clearly exempt from same-sex services already, but some conservatives claim chaplains have been punished for refusing to perform same-sex ceremonies.<br />
</i></p>
<p>We know of one chaplain who was harassed <b>by his denomination</b> for attending a civil union ceremony (he quit the denomination and stayed a chaplain), but I&#8217;ve heard from ZERO chaplains who have &#8220;been punished for refusing to perform same-sex ceremonies.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Kincaid</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/09/13/48643/comment-page-1#comment-142477</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Kincaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 18:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=48643#comment-142477</guid>
		<description>In terms of legacy, Inhofe appears to be trying to unseat Jesse Helms.  It seems that he wants history to view him as the chief homophobe of the US Senate; or, at least, the voice of its last gasp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In terms of legacy, Inhofe appears to be trying to unseat Jesse Helms.  It seems that he wants history to view him as the chief homophobe of the US Senate; or, at least, the voice of its last gasp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hue-Man</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/09/13/48643/comment-page-1#comment-142467</link>
		<dc:creator>Hue-Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 17:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=48643#comment-142467</guid>
		<description>Where in the bibble does it say that you are required to be petty and vindicative when dealing with gay people? Like denying gay partners access to their loved ones in hospital, no one&#039;s life is in danger, the facility will not be destroyed, and it&#039;s nobody&#039;s business. It&#039;s simple spite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where in the bibble does it say that you are required to be petty and vindicative when dealing with gay people? Like denying gay partners access to their loved ones in hospital, no one&#8217;s life is in danger, the facility will not be destroyed, and it&#8217;s nobody&#8217;s business. It&#8217;s simple spite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MattNYC</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/09/13/48643/comment-page-1#comment-142456</link>
		<dc:creator>MattNYC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 17:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=48643#comment-142456</guid>
		<description>The GOP has mastered Orwellian language.  Thanks to a P.O.S. named Frank Luntz.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The GOP has mastered Orwellian language.  Thanks to a P.O.S. named Frank Luntz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sammy</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/09/13/48643/comment-page-1#comment-142450</link>
		<dc:creator>Sammy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 17:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=48643#comment-142450</guid>
		<description>&quot;Military Religious Freedom Act&quot;??  How about &quot;Military Religious Curtailment Act&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Military Religious Freedom Act&#8221;??  How about &#8220;Military Religious Curtailment Act&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Truthspew</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/09/13/48643/comment-page-1#comment-142392</link>
		<dc:creator>Truthspew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 15:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=48643#comment-142392</guid>
		<description>I guess they want to see the entirety of DOMA struck down then. I mean, if this does make it to the Supreme Court we have a perfect example of the animus against the gay community in these two dispshits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess they want to see the entirety of DOMA struck down then. I mean, if this does make it to the Supreme Court we have a perfect example of the animus against the gay community in these two dispshits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
