<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Daily Agenda for Monday, October 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/10/01/49042/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/10/01/49042</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 14:07:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: F Young</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/10/01/49042/comment-page-1#comment-154777</link>
		<dc:creator>F Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 15:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=49042#comment-154777</guid>
		<description>The Supreme Curt has published its Order List:
http://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/100112zor.pdf

The Diaz, Windsor and Proposition 8 cases are not mentioned. Presumably, the court has not yet decided whether it will hear those appeals, perhaps because it wants to consider all the marriage equality cases together. Some are speculating it is delaying announcing a decision until after the election.

However the court stated that it denied certiorari in the NOM V McKee case. So, that appeal will not be heard. The decisions of the Court of Appeals against NOM will stand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Curt has published its Order List:<br />
<a href="http://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/100112zor.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/100112zor.pdf</a></p>
<p>The Diaz, Windsor and Proposition 8 cases are not mentioned. Presumably, the court has not yet decided whether it will hear those appeals, perhaps because it wants to consider all the marriage equality cases together. Some are speculating it is delaying announcing a decision until after the election.</p>
<p>However the court stated that it denied certiorari in the NOM V McKee case. So, that appeal will not be heard. The decisions of the Court of Appeals against NOM will stand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Kramer</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/10/01/49042/comment-page-1#comment-154662</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Kramer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 10:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=49042#comment-154662</guid>
		<description>The second paragraph says &quot;Charles Ives&quot; instead of &quot;George.&quot; (Charles Ives was the American composer, who may have slipped into your thoughts.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The second paragraph says &#8220;Charles Ives&#8221; instead of &#8220;George.&#8221; (Charles Ives was the American composer, who may have slipped into your thoughts.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F Young</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/10/01/49042/comment-page-1#comment-154640</link>
		<dc:creator>F Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 09:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=49042#comment-154640</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the history bite on George Cecil Ives and the Order of Chaeronea. 

You are making uo for the inadequacy of my education.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the history bite on George Cecil Ives and the Order of Chaeronea. </p>
<p>You are making uo for the inadequacy of my education.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
