Comments on: Second Appeals Upholds Lower Court Decision Striking Down DOMA’s Section 3 http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/10/18/49865 News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric Sun, 19 May 2013 14:07:11 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 By: customartist http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/10/18/49865/comment-page-1#comment-165766 customartist Fri, 19 Oct 2012 18:17:22 +0000 http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=49865#comment-165766 I think that the Supreme court is uncomfortable with taking this case. How long can they delay? I think that the Supreme court is uncomfortable with taking this case.

How long can they delay?

]]> By: tristram http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/10/18/49865/comment-page-1#comment-165328 tristram Thu, 18 Oct 2012 21:20:28 +0000 http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=49865#comment-165328 Thank you for making it clear that this decision relates to Section 3 but not directly to Section 2. Many generel news sources (and gay-focused sources which should certainly know better)fail to make that important distinction. Thank you for making it clear that this decision relates to Section 3 but not directly to Section 2. Many generel news sources (and gay-focused sources which should certainly know better)fail to make that important distinction.

]]> By: Ben In Oakland http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/10/18/49865/comment-page-1#comment-165268 Ben In Oakland Thu, 18 Oct 2012 18:15:33 +0000 http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=49865#comment-165268 From the decision: "DOMA’s classification of same-sex spouses was not substantially related to an important government interest." I believe they left out a very important single letter. ANY important government interest. From the decision: “DOMA’s classification of same-sex spouses was not substantially related to an important government interest.”

I believe they left out a very important single letter.

ANY important government interest.

]]>