<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Daily Agenda for Monday, October 29</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/10/29/49976/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/10/29/49976</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 03:06:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/10/29/49976/comment-page-1#comment-170929</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=49976#comment-170929</guid>
		<description>Can someone explain the postscript? Was the editor attempting to discredit the letter writer by pointing out his racism, or was he taking the opportunity to point out the prevalence of prejudice in all its forms?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can someone explain the postscript? Was the editor attempting to discredit the letter writer by pointing out his racism, or was he taking the opportunity to point out the prevalence of prejudice in all its forms?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben in Oakland</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/10/29/49976/comment-page-1#comment-170454</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben in Oakland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 15:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=49976#comment-170454</guid>
		<description>&quot;This sentence shows that the writer is no more broadminded on the racial question than most people are on the subject of sexual abnormalities and perversions.-W. J. R.&quot;

That little postscript shows that the powers of projecting ones own sins upon others for purposes of denigration was alive and well even then. What else were slavery, Jim Crow, segregation, and miscegenation laws about, except the inherent presumption of superiority of some people over other people? Well, slavery was of course about power and money as well, but besides that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This sentence shows that the writer is no more broadminded on the racial question than most people are on the subject of sexual abnormalities and perversions.-W. J. R.&#8221;</p>
<p>That little postscript shows that the powers of projecting ones own sins upon others for purposes of denigration was alive and well even then. What else were slavery, Jim Crow, segregation, and miscegenation laws about, except the inherent presumption of superiority of some people over other people? Well, slavery was of course about power and money as well, but besides that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
