<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DOMA gets a funding boost</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/12/14/51947/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/12/14/51947</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 18:14:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regan DuCasse</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/12/14/51947/comment-page-1#comment-198425</link>
		<dc:creator>Regan DuCasse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2012 17:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=51947#comment-198425</guid>
		<description>GOOD one, Priya Lynn!
  DOMA is being enforced, for sure. Defense in court would be interesting to watch.
 All of the stated reasons for it&#039;s existence, any defenses, are not legal singly or collectively.
  You know all of what defenses are used already, so it&#039;s any wonder DOMA has any chance of being upheld except for Scalia and Thomas&#039;s contrariness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GOOD one, Priya Lynn!<br />
  DOMA is being enforced, for sure. Defense in court would be interesting to watch.<br />
 All of the stated reasons for it&#8217;s existence, any defenses, are not legal singly or collectively.<br />
  You know all of what defenses are used already, so it&#8217;s any wonder DOMA has any chance of being upheld except for Scalia and Thomas&#8217;s contrariness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Kincaid</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/12/14/51947/comment-page-1#comment-195755</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Kincaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2012 00:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=51947#comment-195755</guid>
		<description>Oh, huh, I just noticed. I actually did use the word &quot;secrecy&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, huh, I just noticed. I actually did use the word &#8220;secrecy&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Tisinai</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/12/14/51947/comment-page-1#comment-195717</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Tisinai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 23:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=51947#comment-195717</guid>
		<description>Timothy is right, of course, when he say  DOMA&#039;s defender complain about the president not “enforcing the law.&quot; They complain about that all time. There&#039;s nothing dishonest in pointing that out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Timothy is right, of course, when he say  DOMA&#8217;s defender complain about the president not “enforcing the law.&#8221; They complain about that all time. There&#8217;s nothing dishonest in pointing that out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/12/14/51947/comment-page-1#comment-195450</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 20:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=51947#comment-195450</guid>
		<description>@First Andrew, where is yours?  AND where is Timothy Kincaides?  He does not Own this site, he blogs on it.  There is a difference, or is that only imperative when you want to attack someone?

If an individual wishes to work for a blog and let his opinions out, then the readers of the blog (after all the readers are why the blog exists) wish to question him, or even get confrontational about issues, that is the entire point of a blog you know, then it is their right to do so.

My comments are my opinion and as such I will state them.

Also, why is it nasty to insist that all the facts get put into a story?  Why is it nasty to insist that authors correct or add to their stories if those stories are laacking?  Timothy calls Jim out on his errors and gets as down and dirty in his comments to readers as I do to him.  But I suppose thats OKIYAR.

Also, Timothy, you did indeed state in late October that you were not a part of LCR.  I correct myself when the facts can be verified.  You still neglect to fix the lack of information in your article, which enables you to take a democrat bashing position in regards to Nancy Pelosi&#039;s statement about the SECRET funding talked about here, but neglected in the actual story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@First Andrew, where is yours?  AND where is Timothy Kincaides?  He does not Own this site, he blogs on it.  There is a difference, or is that only imperative when you want to attack someone?</p>
<p>If an individual wishes to work for a blog and let his opinions out, then the readers of the blog (after all the readers are why the blog exists) wish to question him, or even get confrontational about issues, that is the entire point of a blog you know, then it is their right to do so.</p>
<p>My comments are my opinion and as such I will state them.</p>
<p>Also, why is it nasty to insist that all the facts get put into a story?  Why is it nasty to insist that authors correct or add to their stories if those stories are laacking?  Timothy calls Jim out on his errors and gets as down and dirty in his comments to readers as I do to him.  But I suppose thats OKIYAR.</p>
<p>Also, Timothy, you did indeed state in late October that you were not a part of LCR.  I correct myself when the facts can be verified.  You still neglect to fix the lack of information in your article, which enables you to take a democrat bashing position in regards to Nancy Pelosi&#8217;s statement about the SECRET funding talked about here, but neglected in the actual story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markanthony</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/12/14/51947/comment-page-1#comment-195437</link>
		<dc:creator>markanthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 19:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=51947#comment-195437</guid>
		<description>I 2nd FirstAndrew&#039;s point.  

Interesting, the Roll Call article points out that defense funding is coming from the House&#039;s staffing budget.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I 2nd FirstAndrew&#8217;s point.  </p>
<p>Interesting, the Roll Call article points out that defense funding is coming from the House&#8217;s staffing budget.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Kincaid</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/12/14/51947/comment-page-1#comment-195433</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Kincaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 19:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=51947#comment-195433</guid>
		<description>Robert, 

My only interest in correcting your false assertions about me is in that ensuring that others don&#039;t mistakenly think that your &quot;facts&quot; are factual.  

You are, of course, entitled to believe anything you like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert, </p>
<p>My only interest in correcting your false assertions about me is in that ensuring that others don&#8217;t mistakenly think that your &#8220;facts&#8221; are factual.  </p>
<p>You are, of course, entitled to believe anything you like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FirstAndrew</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/12/14/51947/comment-page-1#comment-195423</link>
		<dc:creator>FirstAndrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 19:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=51947#comment-195423</guid>
		<description>@Robert - 

Where&#039;s your daily updated news blog?  Timothy is one of the major contributors to this site.  Whether you agree with him or not being, being nasty is unnecessary.

Does anyone else feel like the vitriol of the comments section is increasing?  I can&#039;t even be bothered to read them usually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Robert &#8211; </p>
<p>Where&#8217;s your daily updated news blog?  Timothy is one of the major contributors to this site.  Whether you agree with him or not being, being nasty is unnecessary.</p>
<p>Does anyone else feel like the vitriol of the comments section is increasing?  I can&#8217;t even be bothered to read them usually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/12/14/51947/comment-page-1#comment-195418</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 19:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=51947#comment-195418</guid>
		<description>Oh, and most people don&#039;t attend political functions of groups they disagree with. Unless they are reporters, and you already admitted you are not one of those.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and most people don&#8217;t attend political functions of groups they disagree with. Unless they are reporters, and you already admitted you are not one of those.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/12/14/51947/comment-page-1#comment-195415</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 19:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=51947#comment-195415</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never seen you state that Timothy.  And do you really expect us to believe that the guy who can tell us the inner workings of a local LCR chapter, and the fact that two members leaving it was inconsequential. How in the world would you know anything about the local membership and the impact of the Nortes leaving if you were not affiliated in some way?

Not to mention the VERY sppirited defense of LCR, and the Right wing throught the electoral process.  You might be trying to deny it now, but you let your political affiliations stand on their own in every comment and story you post.  You may have never &quot;written&quot; your affiliation in exact words &quot;I am republican&quot;, but you don&#039;t have to.  EVERY article you right has the slant of your politics.

And I see you still haven&#039;t addressed the fact that you left out the most important aspect of this story to score your nasty little comment about Pelosi.

You need tostand up and take ownership of what you write.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never seen you state that Timothy.  And do you really expect us to believe that the guy who can tell us the inner workings of a local LCR chapter, and the fact that two members leaving it was inconsequential. How in the world would you know anything about the local membership and the impact of the Nortes leaving if you were not affiliated in some way?</p>
<p>Not to mention the VERY sppirited defense of LCR, and the Right wing throught the electoral process.  You might be trying to deny it now, but you let your political affiliations stand on their own in every comment and story you post.  You may have never &#8220;written&#8221; your affiliation in exact words &#8220;I am republican&#8221;, but you don&#8217;t have to.  EVERY article you right has the slant of your politics.</p>
<p>And I see you still haven&#8217;t addressed the fact that you left out the most important aspect of this story to score your nasty little comment about Pelosi.</p>
<p>You need tostand up and take ownership of what you write.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Kincaid</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/12/14/51947/comment-page-1#comment-195364</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Kincaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 18:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=51947#comment-195364</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not a member of Log Cabin Republicans.  And I&#039;m pretty sure I actually &lt;em&gt;have &lt;/em&gt;said that on this site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a member of Log Cabin Republicans.  And I&#8217;m pretty sure I actually <em>have </em>said that on this site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
