<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Newt Gingrich Starts To Evolve</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/12/20/52099/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/12/20/52099</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:56:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/12/20/52099/comment-page-1#comment-214621</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 23:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=52099#comment-214621</guid>
		<description>Saying that Newt is evolving is like saying a chameleon evolves when it changes colour to match its environment. Anyone who thinks Newt Gingrich evolves is as delusional as he. If the tide of public opinion suddenly turned dark and began mirror that of Iran or Saudi Arabia, he would be lighting the burning torches used to roast us.

I first came across him when I was a history major at the same college where he was teaching history. He was a narcissistic swine then, and nothing in his public life since has given me reason to change my opinion. Based on a couple of interviews of his half sister, it is pretty clear they are not close.

It might interest people that Newt is the only one in his family who pronounces his last name in the English fashion.  Rather than Ging-riCH, it is pronounced in the German fashion of Ging-ricK.  People from his hometown who knew the family also use the German-style pronunciation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saying that Newt is evolving is like saying a chameleon evolves when it changes colour to match its environment. Anyone who thinks Newt Gingrich evolves is as delusional as he. If the tide of public opinion suddenly turned dark and began mirror that of Iran or Saudi Arabia, he would be lighting the burning torches used to roast us.</p>
<p>I first came across him when I was a history major at the same college where he was teaching history. He was a narcissistic swine then, and nothing in his public life since has given me reason to change my opinion. Based on a couple of interviews of his half sister, it is pretty clear they are not close.</p>
<p>It might interest people that Newt is the only one in his family who pronounces his last name in the English fashion.  Rather than Ging-riCH, it is pronounced in the German fashion of Ging-ricK.  People from his hometown who knew the family also use the German-style pronunciation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CPT_Doom</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/12/20/52099/comment-page-1#comment-205880</link>
		<dc:creator>CPT_Doom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 13:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=52099#comment-205880</guid>
		<description>I love how Newt suddenly finds that this distinction between civil and religious marriage exists, seeing as his &quot;marriage&quot; to his current &quot;wife&quot; - the one who took $$ in exchange for sexual favors over the 6-year period she was on salary to the Speakers&#039; office and undermining his then-marriage - was actually celebrated twice, and only the first time was the legal one. Calista is such a good Catholic - except for the whole adultery thing, of course - that she insisted their marriage be recognized by the Roman Catholic Church, requiring Newt not only to convert, but to renounce his previous two marriages as immoral mistakes and label his children are bastards. This took place several years after he dumped Marianne for Calista.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love how Newt suddenly finds that this distinction between civil and religious marriage exists, seeing as his &#8220;marriage&#8221; to his current &#8220;wife&#8221; &#8211; the one who took $$ in exchange for sexual favors over the 6-year period she was on salary to the Speakers&#8217; office and undermining his then-marriage &#8211; was actually celebrated twice, and only the first time was the legal one. Calista is such a good Catholic &#8211; except for the whole adultery thing, of course &#8211; that she insisted their marriage be recognized by the Roman Catholic Church, requiring Newt not only to convert, but to renounce his previous two marriages as immoral mistakes and label his children are bastards. This took place several years after he dumped Marianne for Calista.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DN</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/12/20/52099/comment-page-1#comment-205737</link>
		<dc:creator>DN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 10:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=52099#comment-205737</guid>
		<description>Newt loves to evolve away from traditional, biblical morality.  For example, twice now he&#039;s evolved away from his married spouse in favor of his mistress.

No, he&#039;s not a cynical, calculating politician.... perish the thought! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newt loves to evolve away from traditional, biblical morality.  For example, twice now he&#8217;s evolved away from his married spouse in favor of his mistress.</p>
<p>No, he&#8217;s not a cynical, calculating politician&#8230;. perish the thought! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/12/20/52099/comment-page-1#comment-205378</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 05:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=52099#comment-205378</guid>
		<description>Except that its an interesting distinction; love under god (in a church), and love otherwise.
Because love, matrimonial love, is related/connected to God.  
That in the sense of God, and our understanding of God through love, that the two are inseparable, always have been inseparable, and always will be inseparable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except that its an interesting distinction; love under god (in a church), and love otherwise.<br />
Because love, matrimonial love, is related/connected to God.<br />
That in the sense of God, and our understanding of God through love, that the two are inseparable, always have been inseparable, and always will be inseparable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tara TASW</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/12/20/52099/comment-page-1#comment-205250</link>
		<dc:creator>Tara TASW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 03:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=52099#comment-205250</guid>
		<description>I thought Newt believed marriage was between a man and whichever mistress he dumped the last wife for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Newt believed marriage was between a man and whichever mistress he dumped the last wife for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben In Oakland</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/12/20/52099/comment-page-1#comment-204889</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben In Oakland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 22:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=52099#comment-204889</guid>
		<description>Gingrich? Evolve? I thought all current reptiles were the end product of that particular chain of evolutionary succession.

You would have done better against Obama? Honey, you didn&#039;t even do well against R-money. Ooh. i made a poem.
Admittedly, R-money came in second and Obama came in next to last. So, maybe.
 
As for your &quot;evolution&quot; on gay marriage? Myohmyohmyohmy. You&#039;re admitting that all of your previous arguments were false, and all of the marriage proponent arguments were true, even though those arguments didn&#039;t change? Could this have, perhaps, a teensy bit more to do with your party&#039;s trying to use marriage as a wedge issue, and this time, failing rather handily?
 
Newtie, you&#039;re simply the same soulless, self-serving, lacking-in-principle hypocrite you&#039;ve always been, with the morals of an alley cat and the compassion of a rattlesnake. Niot surprisingly, very much like the party whose soul seems to resemble yours, but without the smarts.

This is the reason for your failure, not Rmoney.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gingrich? Evolve? I thought all current reptiles were the end product of that particular chain of evolutionary succession.</p>
<p>You would have done better against Obama? Honey, you didn&#8217;t even do well against R-money. Ooh. i made a poem.<br />
Admittedly, R-money came in second and Obama came in next to last. So, maybe.</p>
<p>As for your &#8220;evolution&#8221; on gay marriage? Myohmyohmyohmy. You&#8217;re admitting that all of your previous arguments were false, and all of the marriage proponent arguments were true, even though those arguments didn&#8217;t change? Could this have, perhaps, a teensy bit more to do with your party&#8217;s trying to use marriage as a wedge issue, and this time, failing rather handily?</p>
<p>Newtie, you&#8217;re simply the same soulless, self-serving, lacking-in-principle hypocrite you&#8217;ve always been, with the morals of an alley cat and the compassion of a rattlesnake. Niot surprisingly, very much like the party whose soul seems to resemble yours, but without the smarts.</p>
<p>This is the reason for your failure, not Rmoney.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael C</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/12/20/52099/comment-page-1#comment-204883</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 22:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=52099#comment-204883</guid>
		<description>&quot;...the party (and he himself) could accept a distinction between a “marriage in a church from a legal document issued by the state&quot;

I sure should hope so. When has a religious ceremony ever been a requirement for civil marriage?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;the party (and he himself) could accept a distinction between a “marriage in a church from a legal document issued by the state&#8221;</p>
<p>I sure should hope so. When has a religious ceremony ever been a requirement for civil marriage?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raybob</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/12/20/52099/comment-page-1#comment-204831</link>
		<dc:creator>Raybob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 21:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=52099#comment-204831</guid>
		<description>Yippee!
I don&#039;t care about a church wedding at all. I do care about federal recognition and benefits.

Um, and it is &quot;Newt&quot; Gingrich, and the word is &quot;tenuous&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yippee!<br />
I don&#8217;t care about a church wedding at all. I do care about federal recognition and benefits.</p>
<p>Um, and it is &#8220;Newt&#8221; Gingrich, and the word is &#8220;tenuous&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
