<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Boehner&#8217;s DOMA Pricetag Reaches $3 Million</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2013/01/15/52788/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2013/01/15/52788</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 09:28:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathaniel</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2013/01/15/52788/comment-page-1#comment-233639</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 01:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=52788#comment-233639</guid>
		<description>I have heard Tony&#039;s point before, but what would happen if the law were simply not defended in the court challenges? 

As for spending, an obvious and cheap fix would be for them to admit the indefensibility of the law and pass the Respect for Marriage act.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have heard Tony&#8217;s point before, but what would happen if the law were simply not defended in the court challenges? </p>
<p>As for spending, an obvious and cheap fix would be for them to admit the indefensibility of the law and pass the Respect for Marriage act.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DN</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2013/01/15/52788/comment-page-1#comment-232602</link>
		<dc:creator>DN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 22:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=52788#comment-232602</guid>
		<description>No, Rob - I&#039;d say we all agree with you that three million dollars is a pittance.  The problem we liberal leftist gays (per GOProud, Gay Patriot, et al) are pointing out is that this money is being spent by the party that demands a budgetary offset for every bill not proposed by their party.

The problem we&#039;re reacting to isn&#039;t the amount of spending, but their glaring hypocrisy when it comes to spending even a single dollar.  Remember, this is the party where every serious presidential candidate last year stated they would categorically *not* accept a 1:10 ratio of tax increases to spending cuts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Rob &#8211; I&#8217;d say we all agree with you that three million dollars is a pittance.  The problem we liberal leftist gays (per GOProud, Gay Patriot, et al) are pointing out is that this money is being spent by the party that demands a budgetary offset for every bill not proposed by their party.</p>
<p>The problem we&#8217;re reacting to isn&#8217;t the amount of spending, but their glaring hypocrisy when it comes to spending even a single dollar.  Remember, this is the party where every serious presidential candidate last year stated they would categorically *not* accept a 1:10 ratio of tax increases to spending cuts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2013/01/15/52788/comment-page-1#comment-232503</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 19:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=52788#comment-232503</guid>
		<description>Yea $3 MM is a staggering amount of money.

The US spends $3 MM every 15 seconds, based on the 2012 federal spending;I&#039;d refer to it as the 2012 federal budget if we actually had a budget.

The $3MM this author is outraged over is equivalent to a hand full of sand on a beach that is a football field long and 1 foot deep.

Federal wind subsidies, which enrich an industry that has never and will never make financial sense reached $1.5 billion in 2012, which is 500 times more money than the outrageous $3 MM.

You can argue against the policy, but please do not pretend to be outraged over an amount of money that is rounded off in every single bill that passes through congress.  $3 MM is imperceptible against $1 trillion dollar deficit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea $3 MM is a staggering amount of money.</p>
<p>The US spends $3 MM every 15 seconds, based on the 2012 federal spending;I&#8217;d refer to it as the 2012 federal budget if we actually had a budget.</p>
<p>The $3MM this author is outraged over is equivalent to a hand full of sand on a beach that is a football field long and 1 foot deep.</p>
<p>Federal wind subsidies, which enrich an industry that has never and will never make financial sense reached $1.5 billion in 2012, which is 500 times more money than the outrageous $3 MM.</p>
<p>You can argue against the policy, but please do not pretend to be outraged over an amount of money that is rounded off in every single bill that passes through congress.  $3 MM is imperceptible against $1 trillion dollar deficit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2013/01/15/52788/comment-page-1#comment-232407</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=52788#comment-232407</guid>
		<description>If the law doesn&#039;t get defended then it can&#039;t be struck down. We wouldn&#039;t be where we are today if they had never appealed the case. Of course they are wrong in their arguments, but we still need them to be made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the law doesn&#8217;t get defended then it can&#8217;t be struck down. We wouldn&#8217;t be where we are today if they had never appealed the case. Of course they are wrong in their arguments, but we still need them to be made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snowman</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2013/01/15/52788/comment-page-1#comment-232258</link>
		<dc:creator>Snowman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 14:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=52788#comment-232258</guid>
		<description>Because they are hypocrites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because they are hypocrites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neon Genesis</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2013/01/15/52788/comment-page-1#comment-231953</link>
		<dc:creator>Neon Genesis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 06:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=52788#comment-231953</guid>
		<description>Why is it that the GOP always complains about the evils of Democrats funding Planned Parenthood with federal dollars yet they have no problems with using federal dollars to defend their own pet issues?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it that the GOP always complains about the evils of Democrats funding Planned Parenthood with federal dollars yet they have no problems with using federal dollars to defend their own pet issues?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
