<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Happy Valentine&#8217;s Day from the Illinois Senate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2013/02/14/53763/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2013/02/14/53763</link>
	<description>News, analysis and fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:01:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2013/02/14/53763/comment-page-1#comment-252051</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 21:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=53763#comment-252051</guid>
		<description>Anyone notice, not a single mention of the Illinois vote at NOM?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone notice, not a single mention of the Illinois vote at NOM?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ebohlman</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2013/02/14/53763/comment-page-1#comment-251956</link>
		<dc:creator>ebohlman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 02:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=53763#comment-251956</guid>
		<description>It will go into effect 30 days after it&#039;s signed. Passage in the Assembly isn&#039;t quite a &quot;done deal&quot; but it&#039;s considered likely. Governor Quinn has stated that he will sign it, and has spoken out multiple times in favor of its passage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will go into effect 30 days after it&#8217;s signed. Passage in the Assembly isn&#8217;t quite a &#8220;done deal&#8221; but it&#8217;s considered likely. Governor Quinn has stated that he will sign it, and has spoken out multiple times in favor of its passage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gsingjane</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2013/02/14/53763/comment-page-1#comment-251923</link>
		<dc:creator>gsingjane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 20:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=53763#comment-251923</guid>
		<description>What is the projected timeline for when marriage equality will start to happen in Illinois?  It needs to pass the Assembly (done deal?) and be signed by the governor (also a done deal?) and can become law when?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the projected timeline for when marriage equality will start to happen in Illinois?  It needs to pass the Assembly (done deal?) and be signed by the governor (also a done deal?) and can become law when?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Kincaid</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2013/02/14/53763/comment-page-1#comment-251783</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Kincaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=53763#comment-251783</guid>
		<description>Chris, 

The terms used for votes in the United States are as follows:

&lt;b&gt;Bipartisan&lt;/b&gt; - support from more than one party. (It can also mean opposition from more than one party, but it customarily is phrased &quot;bipartisan opposition&quot;.  Without the clarifier, it is implied to mean support.)

&lt;b&gt;Party Line&lt;/b&gt; - when all the members of one party support a bill and all the members of another oppose it.  

Incidentally, it is in the best interest of the gay community that pro-gay votes be bipartisan.  Independents - who make up about a third of the populace - tend to favor bipartisan votes but are much less favorable to partisan ones, irrespective of the issue or result.  Which is why you will see every gay group trumpet the fact that this was a bipartisan vote.

It is, of course, not in the best interest of the the political parties when votes are bipartisan.  Sharp divisions improve contributions and fuel campaigns.

So I guess you need to figure out which is more important to you.

(If it helps, while anti-gay extremists HATE bipartisan votes, most Democratic politicians seem to be delighted with the bipartisan nature of pro-gay votes.  Even politicians sometimes put supporting what&#039;s right ahead of their own partisan interests.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, </p>
<p>The terms used for votes in the United States are as follows:</p>
<p><b>Bipartisan</b> &#8211; support from more than one party. (It can also mean opposition from more than one party, but it customarily is phrased &#8220;bipartisan opposition&#8221;.  Without the clarifier, it is implied to mean support.)</p>
<p><b>Party Line</b> &#8211; when all the members of one party support a bill and all the members of another oppose it.  </p>
<p>Incidentally, it is in the best interest of the gay community that pro-gay votes be bipartisan.  Independents &#8211; who make up about a third of the populace &#8211; tend to favor bipartisan votes but are much less favorable to partisan ones, irrespective of the issue or result.  Which is why you will see every gay group trumpet the fact that this was a bipartisan vote.</p>
<p>It is, of course, not in the best interest of the the political parties when votes are bipartisan.  Sharp divisions improve contributions and fuel campaigns.</p>
<p>So I guess you need to figure out which is more important to you.</p>
<p>(If it helps, while anti-gay extremists HATE bipartisan votes, most Democratic politicians seem to be delighted with the bipartisan nature of pro-gay votes.  Even politicians sometimes put supporting what&#8217;s right ahead of their own partisan interests.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2013/02/14/53763/comment-page-1#comment-251779</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 23:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=53763#comment-251779</guid>
		<description>How can you characterize the vote as &quot;bipartisan&quot; if just one lowly Republican voted in favor?! Face it Timothy, the Republicans are who they are and won&#039;t change anytime soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can you characterize the vote as &#8220;bipartisan&#8221; if just one lowly Republican voted in favor?! Face it Timothy, the Republicans are who they are and won&#8217;t change anytime soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben In Oakland</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2013/02/14/53763/comment-page-1#comment-251771</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben In Oakland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 22:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=53763#comment-251771</guid>
		<description>Obe republican.

Quite sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obe republican.</p>
<p>Quite sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2013/02/14/53763/comment-page-1#comment-251748</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 20:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/?p=53763#comment-251748</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a happy Illinoisan today!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a happy Illinoisan today!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
