October 9th, 2009
President Barack Obama has won the Nobel Peace Prize.
Some around the world objected to the choice of Obama, who still oversees wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and has launched deadly counter-terror strikes in Pakistan and Somalia.
The Norwegian Nobel Committee countered that it was trying “to promote what he stands for and the positive processes that have started now.” It lauded the change in global mood wrought by Obama’s calls for peace and cooperation, and praised his pledges to reduce the world stock of nuclear arms, ease American conflicts with Muslim nations and strengthen the U.S. role in combating climate change.
If we are now presenting awards based on intentions and promises rather than on actions and accomplishments, then no doubt the Human Rights Campaign will be awarding the President on Saturday with the Fierce Advocate Award.
Latest Posts
Featured Reports
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
tavdy79
October 9th, 2009
Einstein didn’t get his Nobel prize until after he figured out the general theory of relativity (E=MC2). Why should Obama be honoured so much more eagerly than was the man who was arguably the greatest physicist of the last 150 years?
Andrew
October 9th, 2009
…because increasingly the Peace Prize Committee has become fond of “sending messages” through the prize, rather than strictly awarding excellence. This is a shame — it not only overlooks hundreds who have worked tirelessly for peace, and keeps their efforts in the shadows, it also places an undue burden on Mr. Obama as he tries to exercise his best judgement in office, and only serves to make him look a little ridiculous in the eyes of some Americans who believe in getting the prize after you’ve done the job, not beforehand.
Maggie
October 9th, 2009
So, in what way is this news, analysis or fact-checking of anti-gay rhetoric? Because last time I checked, “I’ll get around to it” and “I will continue to treat you like second class citizens” weren’t the same thing. He’s been in office not quite a year out of FOUR, and it took perhaps two months for the gay community to jump down his throat. What’s the big idea? Obama walked into a disaster in January and is in the process of cleaning it up. Frankly, I’d rather have healthcare and our soldiers back.
John
October 9th, 2009
You’re right Maggie, being president is hard. But then being a community organizer surely he’s up to the task! After all, our Fierce Advocate spent a whole year campaigning for the job.
I know, let’s give him a Congressional Medal of Effort.
libhomo
October 10th, 2009
Obama is at least as much of a war monger as Bush. This is crazy.
Gene Touchet
October 10th, 2009
Some Norwegians looked at what has been accomplished by Mr Obama in the past year. They were impressed by what they saw. They awarded him and, by proxy, us, since we put him in office, a prize.
Why can’t we respect their judgement? Why can’t we celebrate the fact that the Nobel Committee agrees with the judgement of the American voters?
What is the rationale for the touch of snarkiness which infuses so many of these comments?
Mr Obama shared this with a lot of people, including Americans.
Be proud of yourselves.
John
October 11th, 2009
No Gene, it’s an embarassment to both the USA and Norway that the Nobel Prize has been reduced to a Badge of Effort. Obama could be worthy of such an award someday, but that day is NOT today.
Leave A Comment