September 17th, 2010
Sen. Jim Inhofe asking the participants to lobby against repealing Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell:
Your message is this: “Vote ‘no’. If you vote ‘yes’, you are voting for open gay activity in the military and you’re voting for abortions in our hospitals.”
Cuz ‘open gay activity’ leads to abortions, ya know.
UPDATE: Sen. Inhofe’s incredibly stupid comment may need context. It seems he wasn’t suggesting that ‘open gay activity’ is related to abortions. But…it isn’t really that much less incredibly stupid.
Latest Posts
Featured Reports
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
Rob Lll
September 17th, 2010
Isn’t Inhofe a major climate-change denalist as well? He seems to be confused about many things.
John
September 17th, 2010
The man makes an ass of himself but in fairness that’s not what he said Timothy. Inhofe is speaking about not only DADT repeal but a provision of the bill that allows abortion in military hospitals. On that at least I would agree with him.
Timothy Kincaid
September 17th, 2010
John,
Go to the clip and listen for yourself. THat’s not what I heard.
John
September 17th, 2010
Timothy,
I listened to the clip at Joe My God’s site before I came here. He wasn’t saying that gay sex leads to abortion, he was clearly criticizing attempts to repeal DADT as well as allowing abortions in military hospitals.
beachewtoy75
September 17th, 2010
John,
The only mention the word abortion is the one in the quote above. There is no mention of abortions in military hospitals (as far as that clip is concerned).
As to why he’s bringing up abortion, I would assume we’d have to see the entire speech.
MJC
September 17th, 2010
So, once again, we see that what is ‘valued’ is hate and the rejection of modern science.
Tone
September 17th, 2010
Warren and I used to worry about gay sex leading to an abortion, so we just make sure one of us is always on the pill…
Greg
September 17th, 2010
Of course, it’s much more humane to turn the women serving in the military into broodmares. That will only improve military readiness.
John
September 18th, 2010
beach,
Inhofe was speaking about the Defense Authorization which includes DADT repeal as well as ends the prohibition against abortions in military hospitals. While I have no doubt he would love to see an end to abortions in ALL hospitals, given the subject of his critique of the bill, the specific context of “abortions in our hospitals” is clear.
Rob San Diego
September 19th, 2010
Funny how the one group who doesn’t have kids and add to the overpopulation is to blame for all the abortions that straight people are having. Just remember, it’s because of gay marriages that straights are getting divorced.
Richard Rush
September 19th, 2010
I was not aware that abortion was prohibited in military hospitals, and if that is true, I think it’s a disgrace. Abortion is a legitimate legal procedure in the USA. Why is it, and why should it be prohibited in military hospitals?
John
September 19th, 2010
RR: Because enough folks do not want to pay for it and have convinced their legislators not to allow it, a view I happen to share. The fact that something is legal does not mean one is entitled to public funding to engage in it.
Leave A Comment