January 3rd, 2011
We have received word that the Ugandan High Court issued a final ruling today barring the tabloid Rolling Stone (no relation to the U.S. publication of the same name) from conducting its outing campaign of private LGBT individuals. According to a press release from the Civil Society Coalition on Human Rights and Constitutional Law, the court ruled that the issue is not about homosexuality but “it is about the fundamental rights and freedoms” of private individuals. The court found that “the call to hang gays in dozens tends to tremendously threaten their right to human dignity” and that the tabloid’s act “threaten the rights of the applicants to privacy of the person and their home.”
On October 2, Rolling Stone published a what they said would be the first part of a four part series exposing one hundred LGBT citizens in Uganda. The first installment included the call to “hang them” on the front cover and over the article itself. Uganda’s Media Council moved swiftly to order Rolling Stone to shut down after discovering that the tabloid had not properly registered with the authorities. The tabloid complied, but resumed publishing again on November 1 with a second installment of its outing series.
With each publication, more evidence emerged that the tabloid, which carried virtually no advertising, was receiving support from anti-gay sources. Strong circumstantial evidence suggests that anti-gay pastor Martin Ssempa, who is wanted by authorities for his participation in an outing campaign against a rival pastor, was a driving force behind Rolling Stone’s activities. Seempa is currently sought by authorities for his actions in leveling accusations of homosexuality against rival pastors.
After the second expose in September, Sexual Minorities Uganda sought a court order barring Rolling Stone from outing individual private persons in Uganda. The court issued a temporary ruling on November and followed that with today’s permanent injunction preventing Rolling Stone and its managing editor, Giles Muhama from “any other publications of the identities of the persons and homes of the applicants and homosexuals generally.” Human Rights advocates hailed the injunction for its “broad protection to other Ugandans who are, or who are perceived to be homosexual” and notes that the injunction provides an important precedent for other media outlets as well.
Latest Posts
Featured Reports
In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.
When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.
In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.
On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.
Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"
At last, the truth can now be told.
Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!
And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.
Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.
Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.
Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.
The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.
anteros
January 3rd, 2011
what a great way to start the year!
Priya Lynn
January 3rd, 2011
Hmmm, I’d have thought the Ugandan courts would be puppets to the Ugandan dictatorship.
Erin
January 3rd, 2011
I don’t know what the law is over there as far as slander and libel, but homosexuality is unfortunately against the law and a very dangerous accusation to make. We all know this is a witch hunt. I know we can’t change people’s views right away as far as sexuality goes, but their government should at least put their foot down on the whole slander thing.
BlackDog
January 3rd, 2011
Eh, I think even the dictatorship realized that these “outing campaigns” could get out of hand and lead to religiously motivated vigilantism if not checked. These guys want to have an inquisition, and really want the power for themselves, I think. How long before key figures in the military or the regime got “outed” and an attempt to topple the regime ensued? There isn’t much of a pension plan in the dictator business.
I wonder if anyone they “outed” so far was actually gay? Something tells me the “Rolling Pebble” (As GayUganda has called it on his blog) was more of a weapon against the political enemies of its funders than anything else. When it really comes down to it, I don’t think this thing has as much to do with gays as it does with power, pure and simple. Like somebody said about red-baiting a while back, if a simple accusation can hurt somebody then anybody with a few enemies or a vengeful mentality is going to be accusing.
BlackDog
January 3rd, 2011
Erin, a lot of Uganda’s law (including the laws against homosexuality) is based on…or a holdover from…British colonial laws.
So I’d think libel and slander would carry significant penalties.
Soren456
January 3rd, 2011
@BlackDog,
Basically, my thoughts too.
There’s no reason to believe that these people are actually gay. It’s simply the most awful, powerful accusation you can make against someone there, for the moment.
And I’m guessing that it works, just as red-baiting did here. No proof needed; just point your finger.
anteros
January 5th, 2011
it’s happened to one of uganda’s presidential candidates, olara otunnu… he’s had to deal with a nagging public fascination over his single status… speaking out against bahati’s bill didn’t help him much. nobody needs to ask him if he’s gay, the damage is already done. similar to the fate suffered by another candidate, kizza besigye, in a previous election… museveni cleverly got the electorate thinking that besigye was ‘sick’ and that his ‘sickness’ would ruin his ability to run the country.
Leave A Comment