Tennessee Senate Committee Passes “Don’t Say Gay” Bill

Jim Burroway

April 21st, 2011

A Tennessee Senate committee approved a bill that would prohibit teachers from discussing homosexuality before the ninth grade, a measure that would jeopardize anti-bullying programs in middle schools.

The measure, SB49 (PDF: 36KB/1 page), was introduced by Sen. Stacey Campfield (R-Knoxville). As originally written, it stated, “Notwithstanding any other law to the contrary, no public elementary or middle school shall provide any instruction or material that discusses sexual orientation other than heterosexuality.” Sen. Jim Tracy (R-Shelbyville) tried to sidetrack the measure, noting that current state law already prohibits such instruction because it falls outside the “family life curriculum” adopted by the state Board of Education. His amendment to refer the matter to the Board of Education for further study passed. But his efforts were effectively derailed when Sen. Brian Kelsey (R-Germantown) proposed a further amendment, requiring that the Board of Education “shall adopt” Campfield’s original ban after the study is completed by February 1.

The bill now goes to the full Senate for a vote. Campfield has unsuccessfully pushed the “don’t say gay” bill for the past six years. An identical measure, HB229, has been introduced in the House by Rep. Bill Dunn (R-Knoxville) where it has been assigned to the Education Committee.

Campfield has come under criticism for trying to profit from his bill. He sought a $1000 “retainer” fee to debate his bill with an LGBT advocate. Tennessee law prohibits legislators from seeking payment related to their legislative duties outside their salary.


April 21st, 2011

Does the ban also include religious anti-gay material in the public school?

Richard W. Fitch

April 21st, 2011

It should be noted that the gay advocate referred to is Del Shores, creator of “Sordid Lives”, Southern Baptist Sissies” and a number of other droll productions. If you are a member of FB, you may want to check out his fan page which includes the recent correspondence between him and Mr. Campfield.

Regan DuCasse

April 21st, 2011

This coming from people who are all about 1st amendment rights. I swear the bald faced hypocrisy and double talk doesn’t seem to have ANY limits.

This is SO stupid! And this is about restricting VITAL education, in an educational setting. I can’t even begin to understand how any educational body will advocate for IGNORANCE, especially dangerous ignorance that’s been proven to be deadly dangerous for children in places that should be safer havens.

There is nothing to justify, religion based OPINIONS, against science based facts on sexual orientation. Such things can’t trump facts and evidence. But educational institutions will make and exception when it comes to gay lives?
That’s a disgrace on so many levels. This is akin to a school resenting teaching the truth about Jews and blacks, and rather than do that, ban discussions on blacks and Jews.

I mention those groups, because to prohibit discussions about groups that have already been historically libeled, maligned, mytholized and discriminated against, is to further the problem, not solve it.


April 21st, 2011

Yes, let’s not allow teachers to use the word “gay” in an educational setting while at the same time doing absolutely nothing to teach kids not to use “that’s so gay” or “fag” as slurs.

Sean Santos

April 21st, 2011

The section of the Tennessee code being referenced states:

“With respect to sex education courses otherwise offered in accordance with the requirements of this subsection (a), no instructor shall be construed to be in violation of this section for answering in good faith any question, or series of questions, germane and material to the course, asked of the instructor and initiated by a student or students enrolled in the course.”

So at least it’s possible for a kid to bring the subject up without being slapped down. That’s a very mild consolation; it’s still the case that the teachers themselves can’t talk about it. This is obviously a serious problem with respect to sex ed. But beyond that, it can have an effect on discussing literature, current events, and famous figures.

And it makes it really unclear about what liability teachers might be exposed to. What if a kid has to give a presentation or book report, and talks about having gay parents, or discussion of LGBT issues in a book? Do teachers have to walk a fine line between “responding to questions” and “providing instruction”? And to what purpose? So that clueless parents can pretend that their child won’t find out about gay people until age 14?

Sean Santos

April 21st, 2011

For that matter, part of the same section states: “This section shall not apply to [list of courses about biology and health that are not sex ed courses].” Since it says “section”, it seems to provide exemptions for this new bill, which introduces language only in that section. Yet the new bill says “Notwithstanding any other law to the contrary” and discusses primary schools in general, not just sex ed, implying that there are no exemptions at all. There’s a contradiction here; can a biology or health class talk about non-heterosexuals or not?


April 21st, 2011

This doesn’t surprise me. The religious fundamentalists have banned same sex marriage in about 30 states. They are now busy trying to ban same sex couples from adopting children (e.g., AZ and VA). The next step is to ban free speech about gays and lesbians in schools.

I can’t help but wonder what will be next?

Richard Rush

April 21st, 2011

Doesn’t this Fundi-driven anti-gay-bill fall into the category of rearranging the deck chairs on their Titanic or sticking their finger in a dike (not dyke)? The final outcome of the war on gays is no longer a question of IF we will win, but HOW SOON we will win.

Tim Trent

April 21st, 2011

In the UK we had the notorious Section 28 of the Local Government Act 1988 which went further. (See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_28 for details).

We repealed this disgraceful law in 2003 after more than one attempt. We were pretty backward when we introduced this law. We’ve grown up since those days. The USA seems to be heading for repression and thought crime today.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.