Marriage Advocates to Challenge Ohio Marriage Ban

Jim Burroway

March 1st, 2012

From the Columbus Dispatch comes a report that the Freedom the Marry Coalition is expected to file more than 1,700 signatures today to Attorney General Mike DeWine which would change the Ohio Constitution to broaden marriage to “a union of two consenting adults, regardless of gender.” It would also add a clause stipulating that “no religious institution shall be required to perform or recognize a marriage.”

In 2004, Ohioans passed a very broad ban on same-sex unions of all kinds by a vote of 62% to 38%. That vote, coming at the same time as the 2004 presidential election, is widely credited with motivating the socially conservative base to turn out on election day and provide President George W. Bush the margin of that he needed to carry Ohio and win a second term.

If DeWine approves the ballot measure, then it goes to the Ohio Ballot Board, which will decide whether it can be placed on the ballot as one or two separate issues. This would only be the first steps. After those decisions are made, an additional 387,000 signatures will need to be collected, including a significant number in at least 44 of Ohio’s 88 counties. This requires a significant effort in more rural counties in order to make the ballot. Equality Ohio estimates that it wold take and estimated $2.25 million just to get on the ballot. And with recent polling (PDF: 156KB/18 pages) showing that only 32% of Ohioans support marriage equality while 55% believe it should remain illegal, I’m really not sure whether this expenditure is wise in the face of other marriage battles in Maine, North Carolina, Maryland, Minnesota and Washington already.


March 1st, 2012

Its sad that rights “need” referendum.

Priya Lynn

March 1st, 2012

It sure sounds like its a bad move.


March 1st, 2012

Now is not the right time, but it needs to begin somewhere though.


March 1st, 2012

Domestic partnerships or reciprocal benefits( similair to what they have in Colorado) would make a lot more sense and would have a greater chance at succeeding. This not only wastes resources in Ohio but could be damaging to the legalization of same sex marriage in other states that actually have a chance. An attempt to pass a statewide ENDA would be the best option at present.

Matt Algren

March 1st, 2012

GavinC, for what it’s worth, there’s a move on for a state ENDA as well. Not sure what the chances are, though, considering the very red legislature we have right now.

And if I remember correctly (it’s too depressing to go look up), the Ohio amendment is pretty air-tight, meaning that domestic partnerships and reciprocal benefits are off the table until the amendment is repealed.

I hate this state sometimes.

Dave H

March 1st, 2012

We complain, rightfully, when the anti-gays put referenda on the ballot to take away our rights, claiming that it is wrong to put people’s rights up to a popular vote.

For this same reason, I think it is equally wrong for our sides to put measures on the ballot in which people will vote on our rights, even if we think we have the numbers to win.

We need to accomplish marriage equality through our legislatures and our courts.

Matt Algren

March 1st, 2012

Dave, while I think this attempt is poorly timed and ill-fated, the Ohio legislature can’t, and frankly, *won’t* fix it. As for the judiciary, Ohio’s amendment was pretty widely recognized in 2004 as airtight and bulletproof. Unless it’s ruled unconstitutional on the federal level (with Perry v. Brown, for example, he said with fingers crossed), a popular vote is the only way to do it.


March 2nd, 2012

Matt, What I meant was that an attempt to pass a constitutional amendment legalizing CUs, DPs or ENDA would be a better idea.

Matt Algren

March 5th, 2012

GavinC, gotcha. CUs and DPs are off the table, though. There’s some question as to whether the marriage effort in Ohio will have to be two separate votes: One to invalidate the current amendment, and another to institute marriage, CUs or DPs. I would bet that Ohio’s Sec. or State (a Republican) will say that it has to be split, which, of course, makes it that much harder and more expensive.

Ugh. It’s so frustrating.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.