Arrest made in gay church arson; Sheriff sides with arsonist

Timothy Kincaid

August 28th, 2012


They caught the guy who burned the historic South Bloomingville Christian Church to the ground. And when confronted by the Sheriff’s department he told them that it wasn’t a hate crime against the gay-friendly church, but in response to his being sexually assaulted by one of them there homos “connected with” the church.

And that was good enough for the Sheriff:

“I believe it brings some closure to the area that wasn’t, per se, a hate crime, as the bishop portrayed it to be,” North said. “It was more a revenge crime for what the suspect had endured in 2011.

Now if the arsonist was assaulted last year then I support prosecution against whomever assaulted him. After all, if true then “what the suspect had endured in 2011” should be punished. And the Sheriff didn’t mention whether there was going to be an arrest for sexual assault.

But somehow I very much doubt it. There’s just something in his voice that suggests to me that any accusation against one of them there homos was proof enough – not enough for arrest, of course, but enough to justify arson.

Scooby Doo

August 28th, 2012

I noticed that many news reports about this had comments from somebody claiming a similar story. I bet you dollars to donuts that it was the same person posting online comments about the “rape” and also many slandering the pastor of this church.


August 28th, 2012

I’d be more inclined to believe he’d been assaulted if he’d pressed charges on that rather than coming up with the story after being arrested for arson.

Shannon Spencer Fox

August 29th, 2012

Actually, if this was considered a hate-crime, shouldn’t under the Matthew Shepard law, this would automatically get the FBI involved? Not that there’d ever be a reason for them to be involved, since I’m sure the local law-enforcement office has it under control…

(… ‘For Brutus is an honorable man.’)


August 29th, 2012

If the sheriff’s department won’t step up and do it’s job call the FBI.

Regan DuCasse

August 29th, 2012

This is why, my friends, it cannot be emphasized enough that a hate crime is not just about the motives of the perp.

But the bias in the chain of investigation and adjudication. When the law enforcement officers, the judges, juries or medical doctors share the SAME BIAS as the perpetrator, then justice cannot and will not be served.
The hate is pernicious to not just the crime itself, nor it’s result.

Ben in Oakland

August 29th, 2012

Does this remind anybody of the Treyvon Martin case?

Nothing to see here folks. Just a white guy shooting an unarmed black boy.

Priya Lynn

August 29th, 2012

Now that you mention it Ben, it does look a lot like that.


August 29th, 2012

Whoa now. Calm down. We suffer under enough without inventing imaginary slights.

The perp is still going to get prosecuted to the full extent of the laws.

Ohio does not have an omnibus hate-crimes statute nor does it’s local hate-crime laws cover bias crimes against folks for their sexual orientation. In order to get the Matthew Shepard Act to apply the perp would’ve had to have crossed state lines or attacked a federal employee or done something on federal land.

So the difference in motives is immaterial outside of the echo chambers.

This is still going to be a crime above a typical arson under Ohio Revised Code section 2927.11. While it will not be called a “hate crime,” but rather a Third Degree Felony “Desecration of a Place of Worship” & he’s still to be charged.

Now if this gets before a Grand Jury and they only charge him with plain ‘ole arson or if he is charged and the trial jury gives him a slap on the wrist or if he pleads out with sympathy because “them fags had it coming” THEN we can talk about a miscarriage of justice.

Priya Lynn

August 29th, 2012

Blake said “The perp is still going to get prosecuted to the full extent of the laws.”.

I’ll believe it when I see it.


August 29th, 2012

Excellent point Regan. One that is often overlooked in discussions about the efficacy of hate crimes laws.


August 30th, 2012

i dunno… the reasoning doesn’t sound right. If i was sexually assaulted by a person in that church, i would stalk that person and set fire to his house instead of a church, that’ll do more damage to the person i’m taking revenge against.

Maybe its just me.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.


Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.