Russian Sports Minister Threatens Gay Athletes At Sochi Olympics

Jim Burroway

August 1st, 2013

The IOC insisted last week that gay athletes and spectators at the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi will have nothing to fear from Russian’s “homosexuality anti-propaganda” law, which prohibits all public expressions of support for LGBT people. But Russia’s Sports Minister is sending a different message:

“The law talks not about banning a non-traditional orientation but about other things, about propaganda and implicating minors,” Sports Minister Vitaly Mutko told the R-Sport news agency.

“No one is banning a sportsman with a non-traditional sexual orientation from going to Sochi. But if he goes out onto the street and starts to make propaganda, then of course he will be brought to responsibility.

“As a sportsman, he should respect the law of a country,” Mutko added. “Come (to Sochi), but don’t get young people involved, don’t make propaganda. This is what we are talking about,” Mutko said.

Those found guilty of “making propaganda,” however ill-defined that term is, will be subject to fines and jail terms.

Gay speedskater Blake Skjellerup from New Zealand has announced that he will be wearing a rainbow pin while in Sochi: “If it gets me in trouble, then so be it.”

Ben

August 1st, 2013

wow a rainbow pin. I am sure that will comfort those russian LGBT teens who are outed on youtube.

Anyone with half an atom of human compassion should shun anything and everything to do with Russia, companies that do business there, and especially the Olympics.

jpeckjr

August 1st, 2013

The IOC can protect athletes, officials, and spectators while they are within Olympic venues.

It cannot protect them on the streets of Sochi, in airports, in their hotels, in restaurants and bars, on the beach, etc. That is what Mr. Mutko is saying.

The streets of Sochi will not be safe for anyone supporting LGBT recognition let alone equality.

Odie

August 1st, 2013

Man, I have to wonder, what is that dude so angry about? So many of these anti-gay people…they just look angry or have a real sour expression on their face all the time. I know a few people who are very anti-gay, Fundamentalist Christians mostly (I’m no longer religious myself) and some of them are the meanest people you ever did see. So much for the “Joy of the Lord” huh?

I think some of these people classify the fact that they ‘have to acknowledge that queers are people too’ as pro-gay propaganda. They seem to require someone to hate. I wonder why, it sure don’t say that in the Bible. LOVE thy neighbor.

That guy sure ain’t got no love.

Parhelion

August 1st, 2013

@Ben:

He’ll be at some risk that a grandstanding pol or covertly-sponsored thug will chose to use him for a painful example of their disapproval of us all. That’s a lot more risk than I’ll be taking when I protest, boycott, and write over here (although I can’t speak for you, of course).

Gene in L.A.

August 1st, 2013

Ben, you seem cynical about the effectiveness of wearing a rainbow pin ir one goes to Sochi. Question: how much more will a boycott of the Olympics do to “comfort those russian LGBT teens who are outed on youtube”?

The previous boycott, in 1978, of the Moscow Olympics, was non-traditional for us. The U.S. debated boycotting Hitler’s 1936 Olympics, but narrowly decided to go. In the event, Jesse Owens, a black man, took away four gold medals and was the star of the games. I for one would love to see Blake Skjellerup or some other gay athlete do the same for us next year.

Boycotts have never gotten us much. Boycotting Coors and Carls Jr. was pretty much of a bust, however rabid some of us were about doing it. Civil disobedience often works. Boycotts in general don’t have a good record, as I’m sure OMM et al could tell us, from their “successful” boycotts of Disney and Penney’s, etc.

Finally, a boycott will not hurt Russia. It will hurt the U.S. athletes who’ve trained all their lives for this opportunity. I’m abstaining from Russian products, but

Gene in L.A.

August 1st, 2013

I’m abstaining from Russian products, but I have no illusions how much effect that will have, either.

Priya Lynn

August 1st, 2013

Odie said ” I know a few people who are very anti-gay, Fundamentalist Christians mostly (I’m no longer religious myself) and some of them are the meanest people you ever did see.”.

I immediately thought of Linda Harvey when I read that – there’s someone that overflows with mean.

Rob

August 1st, 2013

There is much more to a boycott than just not going or buying a product, or even the results of the boycott itself. The Coors boycott may not have been deemed entirely successful, but it did have benefits, such as the galvanizing of a community and the standing up, publicly, and saying “NO MORE!”. Boycotts are not just about getting the results you want, but getting the attention for the issue you need attention for. Just look at the conversation this proposed boycott of the Olympics, and the boycott of Russian products has produced. This goes beyond just being an American Boycott, but one that is now worldwide. Sometimes the attention is far more important than the outcome.
And sometimes just showing up and wearing a rainbow pin is just as important, especially when faced with being possibly jailed, beaten or murdered. And yes, the athlete who says they will wear pins are putting themselves in harms way for what they believe, a bit more risky than the boycott. What are you risking, Ben? A martini?

iDavid

August 1st, 2013

“No one is banning a sportsman with a non-traditional sexual orientation from going to Sochi. But if he goes out onto the street and starts to make propaganda, then of course he will be brought to responsibility.”

If this is the case, then let these games be the rainbow gayest ever, just not outside the game’s’ arena e.g.”onto the streets”. Why go onto the streets when you can be rainbow filmed within the Arena for the entire world to see? If sponsors would jump on board, that would certainly be helpful.

Anything to help those poor kids. It’s quite depressing and quite painful if I let myself go there. Gotta watch it.

Sandhorse

August 1st, 2013

Thanks for the link to the Blake Skjellerup article.

But please warn when a site may not be work safe. I’m not a prude, but my company may frown on some of the ads there.

Thanks

Michael C

August 1st, 2013

If Russian broadcasters air images of athletes wearing rainbow pins, will they be held responsible for the promotion of homosexuality? Will they have to blur out rainbow pins and flags?

Timothy Kincaid

August 1st, 2013

If it’s not too late (and it probably is) I’d love to see the US and other nations incorporate a rainbow into the uniform.

Matt

August 1st, 2013

Let’s not forget that Russia is hosting the World Cup in 2018, so we may be in for more of the same treatment 5 years from now.

In fact, 2014 will be a very interesting time for international sports as Brazil, a very gay-friendly country, gets the WC that year (and the summer games in 2016) while Russia gets the winter games. It will certainly be easy to draw distinctions between the two.

jpeckjr

August 1st, 2013

@Gene in L.A. The Moscow Summer Games were in 1980. There were no Olympic games, winter or summer, in 1978. Sorry to be picky.

Gene in L.A.

August 2nd, 2013

Wow, two years off! Mea culpa. Sorry to be grouchy.

customartist

August 2nd, 2013

Are Gay Athletes going to feel good about themselves during the games, even if they themselves are not harassed, while their Russian gay counterparts are being jailed & worse?

Huh, are they?

If THIS is not worth standing up for, then what is? What exactly would it take?

I for one cannot purchase products endorsed by this Winter’s Olympians.

Leave A Comment

All comments reflect the opinions of commenters only. They are not necessarily those of anyone associated with Box Turtle Bulletin. Comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

(Required)
(Required, never shared)

PLEASE NOTE: All comments are subject to our Comments Policy.

 

Latest Posts

The Things You Learn from the Internet

"The Intel On This Wasn't 100 Percent"

From Fake News To Real Bullets: This Is The New Normal

NC Gov McCrory Throws In The Towel

Colorado Store Manager Verbally Attacks "Faggot That Voted For Hillary" In Front of 4-Year-Old Son

Associated Press Updates "Alt-Right" Usage Guide

A Challenge for Blue Bubble Democrats

Baptist Churches in Dallas, Austin Expelled Over LGBT-Affirming Stance

Featured Reports

What Are Little Boys Made Of?

In this original BTB Investigation, we unveil the tragic story of Kirk Murphy, a four-year-old boy who was treated for “cross-gender disturbance” in 1970 by a young grad student by the name of George Rekers. This story is a stark reminder that there are severe and damaging consequences when therapists try to ensure that boys will be boys.

Slouching Towards Kampala: Uganda’s Deadly Embrace of Hate

When we first reported on three American anti-gay activists traveling to Kampala for a three-day conference, we had no idea that it would be the first report of a long string of events leading to a proposal to institute the death penalty for LGBT people. But that is exactly what happened. In this report, we review our collection of more than 500 posts to tell the story of one nation’s embrace of hatred toward gay people. This report will be updated continuously as events continue to unfold. Check here for the latest updates.

Paul Cameron’s World

In 2005, the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote that “[Paul] Cameron’s ‘science’ echoes Nazi Germany.” What the SPLC didn”t know was Cameron doesn’t just “echo” Nazi Germany. He quoted extensively from one of the Final Solution’s architects. This puts his fascination with quarantines, mandatory tattoos, and extermination being a “plausible idea” in a whole new and deeply disturbing light.

From the Inside: Focus on the Family’s “Love Won Out”

On February 10, I attended an all-day “Love Won Out” ex-gay conference in Phoenix, put on by Focus on the Family and Exodus International. In this series of reports, I talk about what I learned there: the people who go to these conferences, the things that they hear, and what this all means for them, their families and for the rest of us.

Prologue: Why I Went To “Love Won Out”
Part 1: What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Part 2: Parents Struggle With “No Exceptions”
Part 3: A Whole New Dialect
Part 4: It Depends On How The Meaning of the Word "Change" Changes
Part 5: A Candid Explanation For "Change"

The Heterosexual Agenda: Exposing The Myths

At last, the truth can now be told.

Using the same research methods employed by most anti-gay political pressure groups, we examine the statistics and the case studies that dispel many of the myths about heterosexuality. Download your copy today!

And don‘t miss our companion report, How To Write An Anti-Gay Tract In Fifteen Easy Steps.

Testing The Premise: Are Gays A Threat To Our Children?

Anti-gay activists often charge that gay men and women pose a threat to children. In this report, we explore the supposed connection between homosexuality and child sexual abuse, the conclusions reached by the most knowledgeable professionals in the field, and how anti-gay activists continue to ignore their findings. This has tremendous consequences, not just for gay men and women, but more importantly for the safety of all our children.

Straight From The Source: What the “Dutch Study” Really Says About Gay Couples

Anti-gay activists often cite the “Dutch Study” to claim that gay unions last only about 1½ years and that the these men have an average of eight additional partners per year outside of their steady relationship. In this report, we will take you step by step into the study to see whether the claims are true.

The FRC’s Briefs Are Showing

Tony Perkins’ Family Research Council submitted an Amicus Brief to the Maryland Court of Appeals as that court prepared to consider the issue of gay marriage. We examine just one small section of that brief to reveal the junk science and fraudulent claims of the Family “Research” Council.

Daniel Fetty Doesn’t Count

Daniel FettyThe FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics aren’t as complete as they ought to be, and their report for 2004 was no exception. In fact, their most recent report has quite a few glaring holes. Holes big enough for Daniel Fetty to fall through.