8 responses

  1. Freedom!
    January 11, 2010

    [The IP address from which this comment was sent is the same as that which is used by a commenter identifying himself as George78. Although some network providers can assign an IP address so that it may link back to more than one computer, neither of the email addresses provided are valid so we cannot verify this. Please note that while BTB does not share email addresses, a valid email address must be provided to participate in the conversation here at Box Turtle Bulletin]

    Laughable. It’s well known that Wacko Walker is a homosexual himself.

    Several other homosexualist blogs have been bragging about this. Do a bit of looking on the web.

    The bias that he has displayed in this case is nothing short of incredible. He’s all but declared how he is going to rule.

    If you think you can try to spin him as a Republican, you are very mistaken.

    Reply

  2. Priya Lynn
    January 11, 2010

    When people post under names like “Freedom” or “Truth” they rarely stand for either.

    “Freedom”, its a proven fact that Walker is a Republican. If its so “well known” that Walker is gay you’ll have no problem presenting proof of that – let’s see it.

    Reply

  3. Pardon?
    January 11, 2010

    Wow, the religious extremists are already trying to discredit the Judge and/or put pressure on him! Who’d want to be a judge in America? No contempt of Court?

    The issue he ruled on was nothing to do with the merits of the case, but rather the vast national and international interest in the case, and in us all having a good look at the evidence and arguments, pro and con. Of course fundamentalists are always primarily interested in silencing their opponents and so would not want them to have airspace, let alone run the risk of their own bigotry being exposed for what it is in front of a world audience.

    Mr. “Freedom” (intended ironically I presume), if you want to credibly make such assertions about the judge in the case, you should back them up with evidence/links/quotes, and give your full name.

    And there’s no such word as homosexualist, or I guess we’ll have to start talking about “christianists”. Though there’s nothing Christ-like about the prop 8 lobby.

    Reply

  4. Priya Lynn
    January 11, 2010

    [The IP address from which this comment [Freedom!] was sent is the same as that which is used by a commenter identifying himself as George78.]“.

    LOL, and George78 was getting all testy when people dared to assume he was on the anti-gay side in the Millers/Jenkins thread.

    Reply

  5. Evan Hurst
    January 11, 2010

    Is it just me or is it only wingnuts who don’t comprehend that blog moderators can see IP addresses?

    Wonder if it’s the same troll I caught on TWO posting the SAME COMMENT over and over again under several different names.

    Reply

  6. Harold Howard
    January 11, 2010

    “Is it just me or is it only wingnuts who don’t comprehend that blog moderators can see IP addresses?”

    So what? I guess you never heard of open Wi-fi or TorBrowser. LOL!

    Reply

  7. Amicus
    January 11, 2010

    A “show trial”? A show trial?!

    This is yet another, disgusting attack on the courts, by the growing Taliban in America, led by the Robbie P. George and his call to unlawful behavior in the Manhattan Declaration.

    The idea that a Federal Court in the U.S. is capable of staging a show trial shows how depraved and craven opponents of marriage for committed gay couples are.

    Reply

  8. andrew
    January 12, 2010

    Still, it’s very flattering to know that BTB has the attention of some conservative whackjobs. Congratulations, boys, you must be doing something terribly right.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Amicus Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top
mobile desktop